Does The Media Lie?

I'm always amused, in a cynical way, by the disingenuous American media.  There are significant threats to Americans and the American way of life in the world, to be sure, but it's sadly amusing what stories the American media chooses to report.  That constitutes lying by omission.  Take for instance the boy-and-the-gorilla story.  That's a tragedy, and because of some woman's carelessness, a magnificent primate had to be killed.  Sad.  But despite hours of video on news channels, the story was initially rather thin.  Who was the caretaker of a 4 year boy?  Why did she allow him to get near the barricades?  What was the gorilla's motivation?  His intent?  Why isn't the cause of this clearly avoidable accident analyzed?  What is being hidden?  You can see how a viewer may be cynical about the "real" story here, as opposed to just taking sides in the emotional boy-versus-gorilla hype.  Good, boy, bad gorilla?  Or is it poor gorilla, misbehaved boy?  But now we know a little more, and the pieces fall into place as we suspected they would. 

Maybe it's a distraction story.  Put out there so we the news consumer don't get too emotional about the other true threats to us.  Like the Muslim invasion, or the Kenya's fecklessness.  In his final months as Dear Leader, he goes about the world apologizing for what he perceives as America's misdeeds.  For example, on the very eve of Memorial Day, he essentially apologizes to Japan for the US decision to drop atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  It's literally insane for him to do such a thing.  Seventy years ago Japan was an enemy, a brutal, vicious empire, and was defeated in a war.  Today Japan is an ally, evolving in that time from a near feudal monarchy to a vibrant, successful democratic nation.  Why apologize for saving a people from obliteration?  Further, Japan has never apologized for its brutal, aggressive conduct during the first half of the twentieth century.   But our homosexual mulatto Dear Leader feels it necessary for the leader of the United State to apologize to Japan for winning a war.  Had those bombs not been deployed, the US and allied armed forces would have had to invade Japan's main islands, at a staggering cost in lives and treasure on both sides.  My father was in the US Navy in the Pacific Theater in 1945, and was slated to be in the vanguard of that assault.  Chances were good that he would not live through it.  So from my perspective, I'm glad Truman made that historic decision, and Dad was able to come home and have a family, like probably a half million other US servicemen.  Otherwise, I and thousands of others, wouldn't be here.

Another threat to the US that the media conveniently avoids is the Islamic jihad that seeks to conquer the world under a Caliphate compliant with sharia law.  As the Kenyan goes behind Congress's back, and in defiance of the courts' prohibition, he lawlessly imports thousands more jihadists and other terrorists into the country.  Why would the media be silent about a story like that?  Could it be because the Muslim Brotherhood has operatives in the Kenyan's administration, which is already highly sympathetic to Islam?   And could it be because the media is merely a mouthpiece - a propaganda arm -  for the Kenyan and his policies?   Decidedly so.

Freedom of the press is defined as "The right to circulate opinions in print without censorship by the government."  And yet this government nonetheless influences the the compliant media to the detriment of the news consumer.  Dissemination of misinformation and disinformation is, by definition, lying. either by commission or omission.  Therefore, the press lies, by both omission and commission.  But readers of the alternative media already knew that.

Say It Ain't So, Brad

Brad Thor (l), Glenn Beck (r)

One of my all time favorite authors, Brad Thor, recently made some curious and outrageous statements on air.  Wednesday, on the Glenn Beck Radio Program, he and host Glenn Beck discussed their fear that a Trump presidency would cause irreversible damage to the country and the American way of life.  They fear, presumably because of Trump's bombastic personality, that he would govern by edict and essentially shred the Constitution.

Are you kidding me?  Nothing like that has been going on for the last seven and a half years, has it?  Where were these defenders of freedom when the Kenyan revealed himself to be the first totalitarian dictator in American history? How can a man like Brad Thor, whose fictional hero Scott Harvath, who epitomizes the anti-authoritarian alpha male, not recognize the difference between Trump and the Kenyan?  The contrast between the two is glaring:  Trump's an unmistakable alpha male, who loves beautiful women.  The Kenyan is an effeminate homosexual who loves transsexuals.

Nonetheless, Thor asks the hypothetical question of what patriot will step up to ensure that freedom continues to ring by "taking out" Trump were he to be elected president. Whoa. That's pretty harsh.  Had they exchanged the word "Trump" for the Kenyan's name - either one or all of them -  in that broadcast, the Secret Service would be kicking in the studio doors in ten seconds flat!

Given that Beck has had his moments of questionable mental lucidity in the last few years, one doesn't expect this kind of nonsense from someone like Brad Thor.  It's obvious that a good deal of Trump's appeal is that he says what's on his mind, despite whether it's politically correct.  Political correctness is censorship, pure and simple, and by not only ignoring political correctness, but mocking it, Trump heralds the return of freedom of expression, and that resonates with the American people.

So Brad, I can think of several folks - both male and female alike - who need killin', as the old saying goes, who have done irreparable harm to the country and so far have suffered no consequences. But Donald Trump isn't among them.

Hillary For Women's Rights? Ask A Mulim

Hillary likes to say she's the champion of women's rights.  Right.  Ask the ladies Bubba Bill has known.  She's got the gender card, we're told, and she's ready to play it.  Yet in the same breath, she advocates for the US to "do more" in helping poor, war-weary Muslim refugees invade - er, migrate - into the US.  And therein lies the contradiction.  There are no women's rights for Muslims, yet our gal Hill wants to import even more barbaric sharia law followers into the country.

Multiple reports have documented how mass Muslim migration into the United States has brought with it unique challenges to assimilation.  Muslims are the fastest growing bloc of immigrants into the United States, according to a 2015 report from the Center for Immigration Studies. U.S. Census data reveals that Arabic and Urdu – Pakistan’s national language– are the fastest-growing foreign languages spoken at home by U.S. residents. Arabic is now the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of recent refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

Last year, filmmaker Ami Horowitz interviewed Muslim residents of the Cedar Riverside section of Minneapolis, many of whom said that they would prefer to live under Sharia law. As CBS has reported, “The Cedar-Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis is sometimes called ‘Little Mogadishu’ given that it is the center of the nation’s largest concentration of Somalis.” CBS notes that the area is also fertile ground for Islamic terrorist groups recruiting new fighters.  Really.  Ya think?

Coming Soon To Your Town

Mass Muslim migration into the United States has also brought with it some troubling implications forr women’s rights within the U.S.  Europe in general, and Germany especially, is now experiencing a massive crime wave by created by Muslims.  In every crime category statistic, especially rape and sexual assault, illegal immigrants and asylum seekers were massively and disproportionately over represented.  In the US, absurd practices such as "honor killings" have increased dramatically.  This sharia practice allows for the killing of women for such infractions as "disgracing" the family, or wearing "immodest" clothing. Women can be beaten, brutalized, humiliated, and even disfigured by their husbands or families for little or no provocation.  Welcome to sharia law.  And as always, Hillary has it wrong.

Peachy.  We understand that there exists a culture, if I may call it that, that is literally diametrically opposed to the United States' culture of personal freedom and responsibility as guaranteed by the Constitution. That cult is Islam as followed by its Muslim practitioners.  There can be no assimilation, as Germany has seen, and as Sweden has learned.   The two - a civilized culture and a barbaric cult - cannot exist together.  That's not opinion, it's a fact that's being verified in every country in the world. 

So, Hillary, you want women's rights?  There are none in Muslim countries.  So choose wisely.

Pope Francis: Whose God?

I was raised an Episcopalian. I'm christened, baptized and confirmed as an Episcopalian, as were my ancestors for literally hundreds of years. But not now. I remain a spiritual Christian, even though I have little, if anything, to do with the established Episcopal church. Why this sea change? Because of a radical homosexual Episcopal bishop - one Gene Robinson - who hijacked the church years ago, and virtually perverted every one of Christ's teachings in favor of a secular, homosexual themed dogma. Other protestant religions have gone that same route, Presbyterians, Methodists, and others, and lost membership in the process. The deep thinkers in the US bemoan the fact that, oddly enough, fewer Americans are going to church these days. How surprising. Americans want to find solace and comfort within the spiritual realm, not to be condescended to and talked down to with inane "tolerance", "inclusive", "egalitarian" and "multicultural" themes. I remember clearly that Christ taught us to be prepared to make hard choices, especially in discriminating between good and evil, and I'm sure most Christian Americans do so as well.

But comes now this Pope, reveling in the recent election of Sadiq Khan as the first Muslim mayor of London, and insists that mass Muslim migration is necessary for Europe to repopulate. He went on to blame Paris and Brussels for the Muslim attacks on those cities. Well, blaming the victim is a tired and true leftist tactic. As the supposed titular head of the Catholic Church, shouldn't the Pope be citing God and His love of mankind, rather than defending the followers of Allah, the ancient moon god? Apparently not. Suggesting that the West's “fear” of the Muslim invasion of Europe is partly based on a fear of Islam, he said, “ . . . there is a fear of Islam as such but of [IS] and its war for conquest, which is partly drawn from Islam. It is true that the idea of conquest is inherent in the soul of Islam. However, it is also possible to interpret the objective in Matthew's Gospel, where Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, in terms of the same idea of conquest.” Are you kidding me? He compares Jesus' proselytizing to Jihad's slaughter?

So that he is not to be confused in his admonitions against Christians in any way, those near the pontiff suggest that this Pope harbors anti-American views as well. Respected Vatican journalist John Allen says the Pope’s dislike of America and Americans springs from his Latin American origin and the fact that the “resentment of the U.S. is sort of mother’s milk across the region.” Allen cites various coups engineered by the the U.S. in Honduras, Chile, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic. There is a fair bit of petty jealousy that Latin America has always stood in the religious, political and economic shadow of the United States. Allen didn't mention the billions of US taxpayer dollars given in aid, though, nor the outright murderous corruption one may find in these countries. Obviously the Pope, like many other leftists, sees things one dimensionally.

So there it is. He's a leftist advocate rather than a spiritual leader. You can take a radical leftist out of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and make him Pope, the head of the world's 1.2 billion Catholics. Fine. But when one dons the sacraments of the Catholic Church, one must transcend the petty politics of common man and rise to a higher level of spirituality. That higher calling puts the Christian true God ahead of false prophets and third world national pride.

The War On God

If you wanted to destroy a nation from within, how would you do it?  Perhaps you would kick out the very underpinnings of the precepts on which it was founded, and let it come crashing down.  That's what's happening in the country right now, and if you're on the side of the Original Principals of the founding of this great nation, The United Stated of America, you're losing this cultural and religious war. 

Pope Francis: "We Must Breed With Muslims."

Those Original Principals included faith in God, family and moral values, and personal responsibility.  Our nation was born of Christian teachings, despite what the secularists say, and those Principals are being mocked and eroded at a frightening rate.  To demonstrate the depth at which the war has progressed, one needs only to quote the leader of the Catholic faith, Pope Francis himself, as he embraces Muslims and worships not God, but "tolerance" and multiculturalism. Pope Francis, who has taken in 3 Syrian Muslim refugee families into the Vatican but no Syrian Christian refugees, seems to think that the armies of Muslim migrants pouring into Western European countries are nothing to be concerned about. He is absolutely wrong, it is an economic and sociological disaster, and yet he even encourages interbreeding with them.  Islam has been - and still is - the sworn enemy of Christianity for millennia, and it's quite unnerving to see the faith's titular leader embrace not only that self proclaimed enemy, but the secularists as well.  

But there is a voice crying out in the secular wilderness.  One Robert Carnival Sarah (sar AH), who was appointed as Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments by Pope Francis in 2014, addressed hundreds of prominent Catholic clergy and lay people attending the 12^th annual National Catholic Prayer Breakfast Tuesday in Washington.  In what he called "portentous times" for the Catholic Church and for the world, Cardinal Sarah condemned same-sex marriage, transgender bathroom laws, and attacks on the family as "demonic".  "In your nation, God is being eroded, eclipsed, liquidated," he stated.  “All manner of immorality is not only accepted and tolerated today in advanced societies, it is even promoted as a social good.  The result is hostility to Christians and increasingly, religious persecution.  This is not an ideological war between competing ideas.  This is about defending ourselves, children and future generations from the demonic idolatry that says children do not need mothers and fathers. It denies human nature and wants to cut off an entire generation from God.”

God is being replaced in our country, thanks in part to the Muslim in Chief, with the God of the secularists, Tolerance, and the god of Islam, Allah the moon god.  The Episcopalians, the Methodists, the Presbyterians, the Catholics and others have all jumped on the pro-tolerance, anti-God bandwagon.  It's an in-your-face persecution and it's being accepted and embraced by many who may be ignorant of the ultimate consequences.  Under the guise of tolerance, fairness, and political correctness, this insidious blasphemy goes unrecognized by the masses who think only of what's "fair", rather what's morally right.  And because it's easy to persuade very young children, who have no practical knowledge of, or experience in, the way the world works, we have indoctrination rather than education.  And that's why Common Core seeks to accomplish two things: the aforementioned statist indoctrination, and the removal of influence from the parents.  The family must be neutered and rendered moot. And so far the dark side has done a pretty good job of it.

I'm not Catholic, but I must say, Cardinal Sarah has nailed it.  The Church’s challenge today is to “fight with courage and hope… and not be afraid to raise her voice to denounce the hypocrites, manipulators and the false prophets” who would lead the faithful astray.  “The battle to preserve the roots of mankind is perhaps the greatest challenge the world has faced since its origins,” Sarah said.  “Be prophetic, be faithful, pray” for the soul of America and to “help stem the tide of evil that is spreading throughout the world,” the cardinal exhorted. “For in the end, it is God or nothing.”

In a nation of freedom of religion, and of freedom of speech, why is mine repressed, and others' not?

Z-Man, The Gun And The Truth

Zimmerman's Kel-Tec 9

So George Zimmerman decided to auction his Kel-Tec 9 millimeter pistol to the highest bidder, and the enlightened castrati in media goes into shock. Even worse, he told the truth about Trayvon Martin and his parents' parenting skills.  They clearly failed to teach their son to be responsible for his own actions, and when the inevitable happened, tried to enrich themselves from his death.  The link above is just one example of far left wing biased reporting on this case. The facts, mostly ignored in favor of the emotional tragedy hype, is that back in 2012 the thug Trayvon Martin was casing upscale homes from their backyards at night with burglary in mind.  He was spotted, surveilled, reported and confronted by the neighborhood watch, and he subsequently physically attacked and beat up the watch, bashing the watch's head against the concrete curb.  In a case of karmic justice, the watch was armed and was able to reduce and defeat the attack thereby saving himself from certain death or great bodily harm.  The good guy wins over the bad guy.  But that wasn't the story that the media reported, because it didn't fit their regressive leftist diversionary narrative.  The story that came out was that an armed white guy murders an unarmed black teenager.  Lost again in that narrative is the lesson of personal responsibility.  

Ultimately Zimmerman was acquitted by the courts, justly so, but was judged and sentenced by those in the press. Successfully so, I might add.  Zimmerman is a hero to many, but the media still portrays him as a pariah.  He's divorced now, and jobless as well, and the media has another victim via their application of political personal destruction.  The Martin case, along with the Michael Brown case and the Ferguson riots gave rise to the Black Lives Matter radical racial movement.  Presented in the regressive media as merely a Negro-based reaction to so-called racial injustice, it's actually funded and backed by the Soros Group, which along with MoveOn.org, and other far left wing Alinskyite groups, have caused havoc and racial divisiveness for years.

So back to the gun.  Zimmerman put the gun up for auction to raise money to help fight entrenched media supported Soros funded subversive groups such as these.  One online gun auction site would have no part of it, citing controversy as its reason.  I've had unsatisfactory dealings with this site myself, and they are less than professional in my view.  Another site did take the auction, and reportedly got a bid of $138,900 for the little pistol.  So it remains to be seen if the buyer actually purchases the gun, and it remains to be seen if Zimmerman allocates all or part of the proceeds as he's stated.  But it's his to do with as he pleases, and it is a part of history in no small way.  So I hope the collector consummates the sale, and I hope Zimmerman uses at least some of the money to help fight lawlessness and left wing statism.  It's a proper thing to do, and it demonstrates personal responsibility.

More Blurring Of The Sexes

Just yesterday I posted a piece on the biological science of the sexes, pointing out how this notion of "confused gender identity" is a political construct.  Today, as I opened a new tab in my browser, I saw this statement under the Google search bar:  "Proud Supporters of the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia."  Really?  There is such a thing?  A day against fear of homosexuals and fear of transmissions?  Apparently so.  The link connects to a two-minute-plus YouTube video put out by the United Nations, which I suppose is to create "awareness" of the inequality imposed on those who are confused about their sex.  Poor souls.  I tried to watch the video, but it was buggy and constantly reloaded and started over again.  Maybe that's due to my connection, which is buggy because of once solid Verizon's decision to sell its internet operations to some rinky-dink outfit called Frontier.  Or it could be that it's just a sorry example of marketing by the UN and its vendors.  Either way, I couldn't see it all, and if you have the inclination, it's all yours to watch. 

So we need a day to honor the 0.03% of the populace too self absorbed to even figure out if they're male or female?  Poor souls.  Or is this another effort to create yet another victim class, so snowflakes like these can find a safe space from "phobic" folks like me and the remaining 99.07% of human beings in the world who know who they are? I guess that's the lesson the UN wants to teach in this new 21st century: "Know not yourself; Impose yourself on others."  Very zen.  Very enlightened.

Actually, Genitalia Does Equal Sex

It's always been a favorite tactic of the Regressive left to create words that imply a negative position.  George Orwell called it Newspeak.  Example:  I'm male and heterosexual.  I like women.  Decidedly so.  Wanna see my magnificent Y chromosome?   So because I'm normally sexually oriented, I'm therefore defacto homophobic.  And, with this new phobia just introduced today, apparently I'm transphobic as well, whatever the hell that means.  But it's all nonsense, of course.  Few people care if one is enamored of members of one's own sex, or if one dresses like a  . . . whatever.  The bedroom is private, and what one does in there is exclusively one's own business.  In public, however, that's an entirely different situation, and it absolutely does matter what you do in the presence of civilized folks and their children.    

So no one denies these self absorbed cupcakes whatever gets them off, that's their preference.  We do however, require that you not conduct your dalliances in public, nor aggressively shove your perversions in our face.  That's not freedom, you dolt, that's assault.  And maybe even battery.

Once the Kenyan and his band of identity-confused fellow travelers are no longer in the control room, I suspect we'll see a return to normal human civility.  The freaks of the world will be seen for what they really are, and rightfully returned to the carnival tents from whence they came.

Why The "Y?"

As we watch in horror, our Dear Leader The Kenyan issues "guidelines" to help confused mentally ill children be comfortable in their "gender identity crisis."  This nonsense translates into allowing biological males into biological female restrooms, among other nefarious things.  What can possibly go wrong?  Well, gee, everything.  [An aside here:  the word gender refers to grammar, despite its common usage in this matter.  If we're discussing biology, the proper word is sex, as in transsexual or sexual identity.]

One Pair of Chromosomes Of 23 In Human DNA

First, let's dissect the issue, starting with biological science. The Y chromosome is one of the two sex chromosomes in humans (the other is the X chromosome). The sex chromosomes form one of the 23 pairs of human chromosomes in each human cell. The Y chromosome spans more than 59 million building blocks of DNA (base pairs) and represents almost 2 percent of the total DNA in cells.  Each person normally has one pair of sex chromosomes in each cell, with the Y chromosome present in males, who have one X and one Y chromosome, while females have two X chromosomes.  It's the Y chromosome that defines maleness. One is either a male or a female, and it is biologically impossible to change that fact.  Modern medical science can alter physical appearance, hormones, and even add or remove genitalia, but cannot change the basic DNA sex chromosomes.

So, as God designed, each person is either a male with one X and one Y chromosome, or a female with two X chromosomes. That chromosomal blueprint determines one's biological sex.  But being advanced beings, we humans have a complex brain, which creates emotions.  And in some there can be a mental disruption, causing one to experience confusion as to what sex one may be.  That condition, and I'm speaking of transsexualism, is one of mental illness, not one of biological sex ambiguity.  According to numerous studies, it affects only .03% of the population, yet our Dear Leader sees fit to issue more edicts that penalizes the other 99.97% of Americans with absurd totalitarian laws such as the so called bathroom issue.

So what is the real goal behind this pseudo-science of transsexualism?  I see several.  And as with everything emanating from this godless administration, they're all political.  First is governmental totalitarian control; getting Americans used to being under government control in every single aspect of their lives, including dictating which restroom they may use.  Another is the forced breakdown of decency; of moral codes that have been in place in civilized societies for millennia.  So a man, who sees himself as a woman but is still biologically a man, replete with male genitalia, can simply enter a ladies room at will, and avail himself of any and all of his urges that may still be present.  How enlightened we are!  Yet ignored in all this enlightenment is the women and girls who want to go about their most private business privately.  And certainly not with males present.  And lastly is the assault on maleness itself.  The enlightened Regressive view is that maleness is responsible for all the evil and hurt in the world. The Kenyan hates what he is - and is not - in my view, and like so many other despots, his destruction, while aimed subconsciously at himself, adversely impacts us all. 

Hate Versus Truth

Have you ever seen so much hate being spewed by the political elites and their panting, compliant lapdog press?  You'd think we were being invaded by aliens.  Oh, wait.  We are.  The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency in 2015 decided not to deport but release 19,723 criminal illegal immigrants, including 208 convicted of murder, over 900 convicted of sex crimes and 12,307 of drunk driving, according to new government numbers.  But the hate machine cranks out vitriol that is singularly focused on those who would to repel the invaders. But as with everything political in the second decade of the twenty-first century, things are upside down and backward. Although George Orwell foresaw such a world a half century ago, it was Our Dear Leader The Kenyan who was able to enact it.  Truth today is the ultimate evil.

What - or who - is the hate machine targeting?  None other than those who stand on truth, common sense and who seek an end to the tyrannical madness that passes for governance by both political parties, the mainstream media, and the cozy oligarchy that is bleeding the country dry, that's who.  The political outsiders.

The government thinks it's perfectly OK to import uneducated, unwashed, disease-ridden, illiterate, anti-democracy cult-driven subhumans from several third world areas into this country to live among civilized, educated Americans.  The government thinks it's perfectly OK to use established government agencies to harass, kill, torment and subdue the American people (think IRS, BLM, EPA, ICE, TSA).  Now who other than the far left unicorn chasers thinks those are exceedingly good ideas?  I'll tell you who thinks they're insane ideas:  Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and about 70% of the American voters.  So far. 

Because the elites don't think like normal Americans, they simply cannot wrap their heads around the overwhelming support the outsiders are getting.  Trump, with his America First campaign, will likely wind up winning the most primary votes of any GOP presidential candidate in modern history.  That sends the elites into confusion; they simply cannot see why.  Having ridiculed the tea party years ago, and having been able to counter the midterm elections of 2010 and 2014, they still think they have a grip on things.  But the movement is far from dead.  And Cruz, with his campaign to repeal ObamaCare and to abolish the IRS, finds succor with many American voters.

Yet, in the face of this grass roots supported revolution, the elites resort to their last and only weapon.  Roll out the hate machine funded by George Soros and his many globalist organizations.  Trump and Cruz are vilified for their collective audacity to espouse American values:  Faith.  Truth.  Strength.  America.   Can you imagine?  Patriotism in this day and age?  How quaint.  We can't have that:  shout them down, shut them up, crucify them in the press. But with every attack, Trump's numbers soar.  Not limited to just Trump and Cruz, the hate machine aims at their supporters as well.  Ignorant white trash, middle class white bigots, isolationists and preppers.  We know who you are.  Rubes.  Unsophisticated folks just don't know what's good for them.  Nor how to act toward their betters.

The founders of this great nation knew that this day would come.  And they not only planned for it, they left instructions on how to defeat domestic tyranny and return the country to a constitutional republic.  The elites know this as well.  If they try to thwart the will of the people by some arcane manipulation, it's clear that this time We The People are serious.  After all, the American people outnumber and out-gun the one dimensional thinkers in Washington by significant numbers.  And as far as refreshing the Tree of Liberty, the people have the will and the means, and elites know better than to give them the opportunity.

Told You So

Well. It certainly didn't take long for our Dear Leader the Kenyan to prove that ol' Lightfoot has him pegged.  Again.  Yesterday I posted that the Boy God suffers not only from acute narcissism, but is a psychopath as well.  On cue, yesterday this delusional megalomaniac boasted of his legacy during a town hall in Britain, asserting that he single-handedly saved the world during his presidency.  I quote:

Boy God With PM David Cameron

"For us to be able to mobilize the world’s community, to take rapid action, to stabilize the financial markets, and then in the United States to pass Wall Streets reforms that make it much less likely that a crisis like that can happen again, I’m proud of that.”

World Community?  When did that happen? Who knew?  I guess American conservative patriot bloggers like me can take the day off, what with the world saved and all.  Lost on his ego is the irony that his threats of trade wars with Britain should it exit the EU, and even with Germany should it repel Muslim invaders make him the global simian joke that he is.  Yes, you read that right.

With nine more months until January 2017, Western culture's survival is questionable.

Poke In The Eye

A Diseased Mind

Psychopathic minds have a common characteristic.  Based on the need for sadistic control over others, they want to hurt and antagonize. To see others in distress from their actions is their primary motivation. Disenfranchisement, injustice, revenge, retribution, humiliation and other motives are all there as well, but at the end of the day, it's how badly they can make their victims feel that gets them off.  Case in point is the Kenyan's edicts of late. Nearing the end of his over-extended fifteen minutes of fame, he's doing all he can to indulge his narcissism by hurting and antagonizing the American public.  It gets him off, and many in media and politics think that's just swell.  

To wit: Adult men being allowed in girl's bathrooms is one very obvious psychopathic poke in the American collective eye.  But wait.  Advanced by the LGBT lobby, one shrill, vicious and vocal lobby that always seems to be able to get their way, this insane nonsense is being blindly embraced as tolerant and inclusive.  Yet "transgendered" people make up only .03% of the population.  That's three out of a thousand.  But in the Kenyan's mind it's perfectly fair to penalize and antagonize the other 99.97% of the population just to make restitution for all that discrimination these poor souls have suffered low these many years.  Notwithstanding whatever perverted fantasies some may play in their minds, biological males go to men's rooms, biological females go to ladies rooms.  Poor Curt Schilling said just that this week, and was summarily fired from ESPN.  But hey - truth is the first victim of psychopathic minds who hide their insanity behind political correctness.  And the fully brainwashed and compliant fall easily into line.  An assault on American values, just to poke us in the eye. 

This Represents America??

Another outrageous example of a poke in the eye is the replacement of the image of Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill with someone named Harriet Tubman.  Tubman, born Araminta Ross, was a Negro radial extremist of the mid 1800s, and was an abolitionist terrorist who is now lauded for her actions during the War for Southern Independence, and afterward for her involvement with the women's suffrage movement.  OK, I'll stipulate that the North had their heroes, and the South had theirs.  But at a time when the nation was going through some serious self evaluation, is it proper to use a personage of that era to grace our currency, when we should instead being focusing on what created the nation in the first place? Few I know support this, and by the time it actually reaches circulation in 2029, we'll be on a digital system anyway.  But it's the Kenyan's way of inserting race into everything. Poking us in the eye, just because he can.

This Is The Stuff Of Real Heroines

I personally think it's nonsense, but for the sake of argument let's say that it's time we had a woman's image on the currency.  What about Molly Pitcher, a brave American woman heroine who fought the British during the Revolution, carrying water to the American soldiers in battle, and even manning an artillery battery, taking over for her fallen cannoneer husband.  Brave, capable, resourceful, fearless, and adaptive.  The stuff of heroics and legends, right?  Perfect.  Wait. Not so fast.   She's, well, white.  Fail.  The Kenyan hates white heroes, especially those who fought and died to create this marvelous country he's so bent on destroying.  Changing history as promised, and another poke in the eye.

Do you fear for the future of American culture?  You should. This mulatto lunatic has more orgasms planned, and miles to go before he sleeps. 

So What's The Problem?

We've all been inundated with the hype, distortions, misdirection and outright lies by and from each of the Republican candidates.  That's part of the election process, so we endure it.  But in this election cycle, when the GOP candidates are up against the presumptive Democrat candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, there really shouldn't be much of a deliberation.  After all, Hillary promises us another term of policies enacted by the Dear Leader The Kenyan himself, along with a trillion dollar tax increase to fund it all.  And Bernie is no better with his big spending everything-is-free-with-me policies, even though he hasn't yet ascribed an actual number to his socialist agenda.  

Come now the Republicans, two of whom are Washington outsiders, who promise voters the return of law and order, elimination of both the ominous ObamaCare and the despicable IRS, managing the alien jihad and cultural invasion, and finally fixing the economy.  Both Ted Cruz and Donald Trump have their plans to affect this of course, and John Kasich plans to continue to let unvetted savages into the country and basically go along with the policies of the Kenyan and Paul Ryan. 

Because of the desire in both parties for the untainted, un-bought Washington outsider candidate, it follows that most Americans are sick and tired of the status quo as has been imposed on us over the last seven years.  Clinton and Sanders are campaigning on a platform of more of the same, contrasting glaringly with Cruz and Trump campaigning on the we're-not-taking-it-anymore platform.  And that is resonating with most Americans.

So what's the problem?  The problem is not that there's a clear choice of candidates for the future of the country, the choice couldn't be more stark. Either Cruz or Trump will move mountains to not only stop the country's slide into totalitarian statism, but to begin to reverse and repair the damage already done.  Clinton and Sanders seek to maintain the future and the status quo.   The problem is the elites and donors in both parties aren't giving up their grip on their power over the electorate by endorsing these outsiders.  So steadfast are they on holding onto their petty power and elite status, the seriousness of the country's plight ad future hardly concerns them.  They threaten to anoint a candidate they support - one who may not even be running - who may have zero popular support of the American voter.  But no matter.  They are intent on muddying up the water and nullifying the popular vote.

But for that shortsightedness, we'd have a landslide victory for a pair of Republican Washington outsiders.

Hoaxes And Cons

I know I missed the requisite post on April Fool's Day, the day we pull pranks on one another.  But as I am ever vigilant, I thought it'd be a good time now to examine some of the recent pranks and cons being perpetrated upon the country as a whole.  Individually, there is a cause for alarm due to the seriousness of each of these, certainly, but taken together a clear pattern emerges.  And that pattern is a fundamental change of this country from a constitutional republic into a totalitarian state.

Your Future Tenants

The most recent, and perhaps least obvious, is the behind-the-scenes joke our Dear Leader the Kenyan is pulling on us.  We all are well aware that the magician's art is the use of the slight of hand maneuver while distracting us with the other hand. While we're aware of the art, we usually don't see the move.  Barry's pretty good at this distraction.  So while the fawning media keeps us distracted with the the election follies, making sure our emotional and political outrage is at the highest level, he slides in some more of his "social justice" in the form of his dictatorial leadership style. I refer to the new "law" that requires - yes requires - landlords to rent their units to Negro convicted felons.  The Fair Housing Act doesn’t include criminals as a protected class, but the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) says refusing to rent based on a criminal record is a form of racial discrimination, due to "racial imbalances" in the U.S. justice system.  Unreal.  Like most insane retaliatory edicts issued by dictators, this one tramples upon a host of personal and property rights.  The fallout will be immense when, say, an institutional landlord with thousands of units, starts putting low life, black convicts into middle and upper class housing units.  Not only will the rights of the housing providers be violated, but the neighborhoods will suffer as well.  And I'm willing to bet they won't go down quietly. But the Kenyan demands his pound of flesh to punish America in order to assuage the perceived indignities suffered at the hands of the greatest, freest, most advanced nation and society on Earth.  This presidency is, and has been, the greatest hoax ever put upon a nation.  And after falling for it twice, many voters still don't see the joke. 

And AG Lynch Will Back Me Up!

Another hoax being laid on us is the criminalization of opinion.  You think Soviet Russia was bad in imposing forced thought control?  Look no further than right here in River City, my friends.  Now our clueless Attorney General, given her marching orders directly from the Oval office, will criminalize "deniers" of global climate change (GCC), using RICO statutes, no less.  Notice the language being used here.  If we say "deny" we imply a truth.  Yet no such truth exists.  As we have been shown for years, there are no observable facts indicating the planet is warming.  What we have instead is computer modelling.  Any computer user knows the axiom of coding is garbage in, garbage out.  And several scientists involved in the GCC scheme have come right out and said that GCC is merely a scheme to denigrate capitalism, establish greater world poverty, and redistribute wealth.  And it is.  As it applies to wealth distribution, Margret Thatcher once observed, "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."  Well said, but now it's a crime to see the magician's other hand.

Guns and Health:  It's All About Control

There have been other cons, to be sure, all of which are designed to create an emotional public resolve in order to "cure" some perceived social injustice. Take gun confiscation from private citizens as an example.  Totalitarians can't have an armed populace, and they simply can't just pass an unpopular law to rid the country of guns.  So they have to create scenarios that evoke compassion and outrage to ensure support of disarmament.  Sandy Hook is a prime example of a con badly done; it merely served to promote an anti-gun agenda.  Fast and Furious was another, wherein the BTAFE under Eric Holder actually armed violent and lawless Mexican cartels, who used those arms to kill a lot of people, up to and including today.  Even worse than the anti-gun mentality is the nanny state mentality, ever evident in applied totalitarianism.  The hideous Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) is a 2,700-page con of epic proportions.  It limits personal freedom and enhances government oversight,  increases the cost of health care while at the same time limits its availability.  So incremental was it that even now ramifications are still being felt, such as doctor shortages and higher prescription drug costs. 

And There'll Be More, A Lot More.

And the biggest and best con this administration has perpetrated is the invasion scam.  By importing diseased and crime prone illegal aliens into the country, the Kenyan has done his legacy proud.  He's lowered the standard of living, virtually eliminated the middle class, watered down the gene pool, changed American culture for the worse, exacerbated racial tensions, rendered the Constitution impotent, implemented an ever-increasing Muslim theocracy,  lowered the collective IQ, added a boat load of uneducated and non-English speaking Democrat voters, and increased third world diseases here significantly.  He's the only force in history able to successfully invade the United States on its own soil.  For that con alone, he should be proud. 

Yet for the Americans who will have to live with this man's evil treachery for decades to come, we've been punked:  Happy April Fool's Day!

The Cross and the Crescent

Incompatible Ideologies

It's not surprising.  It's almost expected, now that we've become so desensitized to it.  I'm referring, of course, to yet another horrendous slaughter by Muslims. On Easter, no less.   By Islam's followers.  By whatever name they call themselves, they are Islam.  On Easter Sunday, a terror group associated with the Pakistani Taliban attacked a group celebrating Easter festivities in Lahore, Pakistan. At least 72 people, mostly women and children, were killed and more than 300 were wounded after a suicide bomber detonated his explosives.  This time, a spokesman for the terror group openly admitted that the target was specifically Christians.  The same group claimed responsibility for last year’s March 15 double suicide attacks on Christian churches in Lahore that killed 17 people. This year's Easter Sunday bombing is the fifth attack by this group since December 2015.  Not being satisfied with the slaughter of Christian women and children, ISIS terrorists kidnapped a Catholic priest in Yemen in early March during a raid on a nursing home run by Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity, and killed 16 Christian nuns, nurses and patients.  The message is clear:  Islam is a religion of peace.

The Pope condemned the attacks, yet had harsh words for those who would deny or limit these terror fighters seeking access into civilized countries.  A weapon of love, says the Pope, is needed to combat terror.  With all due respect, I beg to differ.  The longest war in human history has lasted at least 1,400 years, and there seems to be no end in sight.  A lack of willful resolve, and I think, a lack of proper perspective prevents a quick and decisive end to this ongoing impasse.   The West, for whatever its reason or motivation, takes in hundreds of thousands of these wretched Muslim savages, and in every case, the result is the same.  They complain, they take over communities and create no-go zones, they riot, they rape, they stab, they murder and they never, ever assimilate. They come to invade and conquer and transform the native culture, but never to assimilate.

So there it is.  Western leaders welcome them to our shores for any number of misguided reasons; new labor, new voters, to replenish the native gene pool, or whatever.  I've written here before - many times - about the inherent incompatibility of Western ideas of self governance, liberty and freedom of thought, as contrasted with the brutal constraints of sharia law.  So the results of the invasions are always the same.  And the terrorists are forthright as they tell us what their goals are: Islamic domination.  But burdened with political correctness and a naive worldview, our Western leaders are blind to the evil.  So the day of reckoning looms closer as the terrorists acquire more and powerful weapons, not the least of which are nukes from Iran or North Korea.

So while the West fiddles, Rome burns.  The barbarians have breached the city gates.  Islam fights savagely for Christendom's demise.  Yet in the end, there can be only one.

Editor's Note:  Mea Culpa.  It seems I inadvertently deleted the prior post of this same name, and unfortunately there's no mechanism to retrieve it.  Therefore I've reposted the gist of it as a re-edit herewith.  Apologies to my readers who had read the original, and I hope not to screw up like that again!

-LC

Give Them What They Want

Terror Strike Locations

First the caring countries let them in, but they do not assimilate.  Instead they complain, they riot, they stab, they rape.  They take over communities.  They even attack news crews doing their jobs.   And then they blow things up and people get killed and maimed. This equation is occurring once again, this time in Brussels. Multiple targets.  Multiple innocent deaths.  For what?  The forced implementation of multiculturalism, which simply hasn't worked.  Arrogant elitists. Damn the facts, push that narrative.  After the carnage in Paris, the recent arrest of massacre suspect Salah Abdeslam in Brussels was an obvious factor in this slaughter.  It may have been intended as a retaliatory strike, or perhaps an attempt to act before Abdeslam gave up vital information on his terror network.  Which he would have done eventually.  He reportedly told authorities his cell was preparing for new attacks.  More death at the hands of the insane political correctness doctrine:  Even former Prime Minister Tony Blair has blamed liberalism for encouraging terrorists because Britain’s elite feel guilty.  Speaking before today’s attacks, Mr Blair said many politicians are now “unwilling to take people on” because they are scared of looking intolerant.  Scared of being intolerant.  Unbelievable.  People get blown up by insane, radical, cultist savages, and the Western Europeans only fear being labeled intolerant. No matter.  Islam is the religion of pieces.  What can possibly go wrong?

Add a Dose of Instant Karma

Even here in the States, our own HRC declared it's unrealistic to monitor our own borders.  But we can give the invaders free health care while they're here.  We can't be intolerant of fascist murderers, after all, that isn't politically correct.  But what to do?  Take Hillary's and the Kenyan's position?  Let them in by the tens of thousands, and hope they kill us last?  I say the West should capitulate to the Muslim demands.  Yep.  Fully and completely.  I say we should give them the war they so desperately want. In a two-pronged campaign.  If they want to use terror as a weapon, fine.  On the domestic front, let's find each and every one of them, take them to the nearest mosque and blow it up.   There aren't any innocents.  Those not in a terror cell cover for, or are sympathetic to, those who are.  Further, they do not assimilate, they disrupt host cultures.  On the international front, require those Islamic nations who have not allowed any refugees into their countries to do so immediately.  Repatriate all Muslims in Europe and the US to these countries, under force of arms.  Those not in compliance will meet the same fate that Islam has bestowed on the rest of the world.  See photo above.  Hate the West?  Who cares.  But do so on your own desolate desert; not from our lands as you enjoy our largess.

Harsh?  You bet.  But it's way past time to quit screwing around, whining about political correctness, and put an end to this nonsense.  These savages can be annihilated in a matter of days given a proper application of  international will.  And no civilized populace has to suffer their savagery any longer.  Or shall we wait until there's a strike in New York or Houston or Tampa, and it's American body parts that first responders will be stepping over?

It's way past the Alamo, or Pearl Harbor or the Lusitania.  Kill these savage bastards now.  With extreme prejudice.

But It's Harder To Shoot

Author's Sig Sauer P232 in 9mm Kurz

As the daily threats continue to be a very real concern with many Americans, more and more are exercising their God-given rights to bear arms as further guaranteed by the Second Amendment. As they should. But now that firearm manufacturing technology has kept up with the world's greatest gun salesman, the Imperial Kenyan himself, citizens now enjoy a very wide selection of weapons in virtually any caliber, weight and configuration. That's pretty neat. When I first started carrying daily, way back in the late Eighties, there were only a few good options. Here in steamy Florida, especially during the summer, inside-the-waistband or in a pocket are just about the only carry options available in keeping the weapon "concealed." And polymer receivers hadn't been invented, so I carried either a stainless steel Walther PPKS in .380 ACP, or a Colt "lightweight" Combat Commander in .45 ACP. Both are heavy by today's standards, and as such, rather difficult to carry and conceal under lightweight clothing. A shoulder holster was sufficient under a suit jacket, but what happens when you need to take off the jacket? Thankfully today I am able to carry anything I choose, with whatever my wardrobe dictates on that particular day.  And so are you.

Variety!

Today a number of gun makers produce lightweight firearms that weigh in at considerably less than a pound, are less than one inch thick, and are available in 9mm, .380 ACP (9mm kurz, or short), .40 S&W, .357 and even .45 ACP and are small enough to carry in a pocket or purse. Glock, Smith&Wesson, Ruger, Sig Sauer, Colt, Kimber, HK, and many others are producing lightweight, effective firearms designed especially for carry. There are a lot - and I mean a lot - of good choices on the market today.  Some of the more popular concealed carry guns can be found here. The internet is awash with gun writers' opinions, of course, and every gun owner has his own pet favorites as well. If you want to carry a firearm, do read up on them, and then just go to your local gun shop and handle - and shoot - a few. Carry what is most comfortable for you to both carry and shoot. And then, learn to use the weapon inside out. Shoot it - a lot. All very esoteric, isn't it? 

Author's Ruger LC9

Many folks get wrapped around the axle when trading off caliber for size. And that's a tough decision. They want a full power 9mm, or .40 S&W or .45 in a small frame that can be easily carried all day. And with that there can be some serious trade offs involved.  A gun may be perfect for carry, but hard to shoot.  For example, Ruger makes a tiny, lightweight 9mm they call the LC9. It's striker fired (meaning there's no external hammer; it's double action only). In a pocket or purse you'd hardly notice it's there. It's got small size, light weight and full 9mm power. Perfect, huh?  Almost. As a safety feature, the trigger pull is a very long and stiff process, requiring the trigger finger to do a lot of work. And the laws of physics cannot be ignored, either. A light gun shooting a powerful load will result in considerable recoil. And these characteristics can make it harder to shoot, and that leads to diminished accuracy.  So that trade off may result in the choice of a smaller caliber in a slightly heavier frame like a Sig P232.  Put it this way: is it better to have a full power 9mm that you fire at a threat five times but only hit twice, or to have a smaller .380 that you fire at a threat five times and hit five times?

At the end of the day, owing and carrying a firearm is all about what's most comfortable - and less intimidating - for you. Not me, or your cousin, or Aunt Mae. You. So find the ones that you like, and can shoot effectively, and carry in confidence. It's not only your right to do so, it's your civic responsibility, as well.