The Third Way Con: It's A Trap

Remember the so called Third Way?  It's actually a term that's been kicked around for more than a century, but in contemporary usage we can remember that both Tony Blair and Bill Clinton used the term.  Supposedly it referred to a solution to seemingly irreconcilable ideologies from the left and the right; a third solution.  In those days - the 1980s - there was an impasse in global power between the capitalistic west, primarily the United States, and the socialistic east, primarily the Soviet Union.  Blair and Clinton, and even George H. W. Bush before them, proposed the Third Way as the obvious solution.  But what the heck is the Third Way?

As we now realize, the Bush-Clinton-Blair cabal was simply espousing an ideology that was essentially a One World Order.  Remember George H.W. Bush's reference to the New World Order?  That was the implementation of the Third Way.  But at the time, the Third Way was moving forward societal  change on a global scale in an innocuous way.  Behind the scenes.  In the dark of night.  Off the general public's radar.

Today, as we witness chaotic change in literally every level of societal endeavor, we also begin to recognize that the Third Way is the application of Hegelian Dialectic.  What the heck is that, you may well ask.  Basically it is the system that is being used by the ruling class to manipulate the public into fulfilling its predetermined agenda.  It should be noted that the Marxists, Communists and Socialists have adopted Hegel's Dialectic to further their global ambitions.

Let's define it, so we can understand it.  Dialectics is a term used to describe a method of philosophical argument that involves some sort of contradictory process between opposing sides.  Socrates' famous dialectics involved a person-to-person back-and-forth argument designed to support Socrates' philosophy.   In Hegel’s (19th Century German philosopher, G.W.F. Hegel) dialectics, the arugument relies on a contradictory process between opposing sides, usually the state versus its citizens. 

The Hegel dialectic recognizes an argument (thesis) in conflict with its polar opposite arugument (antithesis), which demands a solution that is neither (synthesis).  Whew.  Heady stuff.  But it's not so confusing if we apply real world examples that are actually happening now.  In the example above, the USA's dominance of world politics and economy (thesis) was opposed by the USSR's communism opposite (antithesis), which demanded a global authoritarianism instead of either (synthesis).  That's how the globalist authoritarians have managed to carve out a political foothold in every nation, in every society.

The modern elite has taken this a step further by predetermining a synthesis, their specific agenda, and then developing events that arrive at that synthesis through artificial means. If the global elite has a result they would like to have, whether it be increased authoritarian rule or a war that solidifies their power, all they have to do is devise an anti-thesis that will lead to the outcome they want. This is commonly done through false flag attacks, where the government of a nation attacks itself so that it can respond in the way that it had wanted to all along.  It’s recognized that only through that attack would citizens agree to the planned, redetermined synthesis. False flag attacks are not an uncommon way for governments to fulfill their goals.

Think now about the immigration debate.  Apply the Hegelian Dialectic to that chaos.  Polarized ideas at odds with each other.  Pro-immigration versus America firsters. No middle ground.  Or the gun control issue.  Gun grabbers versus pro-rights advocates.  No middle ground.  People tire of the conflict, and take the only solution offered.  Enter the Third Way:  no borders, nullify the Second Amendment.  See how this con is being run?  This is how, over the last fifty years, Americans have - little by little - literally voted away their rights.

The next time you're in a political discussion, keep in mind that the argument you're making may very well not be the real issue.  Consider what may be the ultimate goal of the elites, whether they be the deep state, the progressive agenda, or fake news purveyors.  Think it through: who benefits from which outcome?

From Families Belong Together Protest, Wash. DC

The image at right perfectly describes the conflict.  Paid protesters fan the flames, heighten the chaos, until the real Americans are exhausted with the fight.  This is the Hegelian Dialectic in actual practice.  We always knew what the global elites were doing, but the Hegelian Dialectic shows us how how they are doing it.  By exposing the game, we can now learn how to win it.  And that's pretty much what's been happening over the last eighteen months.  

Against all odds, Donald J. Trump won the election by promising to win the battle against the entrenched political globalists elites, and give the country back to we the people.  

And he's  doing that by not invoking the Third Way.

America's Most Hated

We Americans like to rank things - and I mean everything - so I'd thought we should take a stab at ranking the things that Americans hate most.  By Americans, I'm referring to the fine folks who make this country, who work and pay taxes, and who live predominately in fly-over country.  Not the self absorbed, social-warring elitist narcissists that tend to populate both coasts.    So without further ado, here we go, in no particular order.

1.  The Swamp

This is the collection of unelected bureaucrats who actually  run the country from the bowels of the various institutions that make up the Federal Government.  It's so vast, it can't really be identified by name.  But it can be felt in the regulations, injustices and corruption that trickles down to normal folks, usually in a negative way.  The deep state.  It's Mueller's witch hunt and his and Rosenstein's intimidation of everyone. It's the corruption at the State Department (Hillary), The Department of Justice (Holder, Yates, Lynch), Internal Revenue Service (Lerner) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Brennan, et al).  It's what gave us eight corrupt years of a Muslim mulatto Marxist who publicly promised to "transform America" into a socialist, top-down-driven authoritarian banana republic.  And he almost did.

2.  Social Justice Warriors 

Deliver us, oh Lord, from the tyranny of the perpetually offended Puritans.  I use the word Puritan, not in the original Christian sense, but in the sense that this is a group who feel superior to everyone else - reveling in their purity and piety despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary - and who are bound and determined to force their rigid and irrational views everyone else.  These idiots make up most of the oh-so-woke elitists in Hollywood, academia (Ivy League and State colleges as well), the NFL, Netflix, social media giants (Facebook, Google and Amazon), fake news outlets (CNN, NBC, CBS and ABC), the #MeToo supplicants and countless others.  Please, Hogg and Garcia, go back to school and learn something before preaching to adults about that which you know so little.  Give us a break with your constant whining about perceived slights that never occurred, or did happen but were of no consequence.  You're merely showing us that you are over educated for your level of intelligence.

 3.  Muslims, MS-13 and Illegals

More than a few polls have clearly shown that, by large margins, real Americans are fundamentally opposed to illegal immigration - forced or otherwise.  Those same Americans are whole heatedly in favor of meritorious immigration, however, which is immigration by those who can move American culture upward and forward.  That means skill based qualifications.  What Americans don't want- and have been  loudly saying so - is uneducated, unclean, illiterate, diseased, religious fanatics coming ashore and, well, basically screwing up the place.  They cost taxpayers money, and they bring no value.  Well, except as potential Democrat voters.  And that right there is the sole reason we're fighting this wave of human debris that is intent upon destroying the American culture.  And dream.  But some big political donors believe this is simply a cheap labor issue, and hey - what's the worse that can happen?  But Americans know.  They have to live among these savages who bring their violence, crime, lunacy, disease, and drag on the economy to neighborhoods all over the nation. But our government - see The Swamp above - insist on importing this disruptive element into American society.  And this I will tell you this with a degree of certainty:  it will not end well if the influx is not stopped, and those illegally here already are not deported.  Count on it.

4.  The Crime Machines

The worst criminal in American history is Hillary Rodham Clinton.  This fact will be proven, even if it's years or decades after her death.  It would take a textbook to detail her criminal activities throughout her years in public office, and several have already been written.  She's the one who coined the term "politics of personal destruction," and everyone who has gotten sideways with this witch has been either completely personally destroyed, or dead.  And even as investigation after investigation has revealed her crimes, deceit and traitorous sedition, she remains unindicted.  She's not in prison where she belongs. No, she's free to continue collecting her blackmail and extortion payments, and to run her pay-for-play schemes.  And why do you suppose this is?  Because on one wants to go up against her or the Kenyan's community "outreach" destruction machine.  No one.  Vile, destructive and corrupt to the core, these two crime machines make Japan's Triads or Sicily's Mafia look like mere schoolyard bullies.  See The Swamp above.

We can see that these groups fall into the category of Enemies of the State.  Rather than enacting a solution to the nonsense above, like implementing a total and concerted removal - and replacing - of the entire Federal Government, we placate ourselves with silly ranking lists.  

Well, it's easier to complain than to act.  Ask any Democrat.

D-Day

Today is the seventy-fourth anniversary of D Day, the Allied amphibious invasion on the beaches of Normandy during World War II.  That assault began the drive across Europe, liberating towns and villages all across western Europe, and ultimately the defeat of the Third Reich.   

On June 6, 1944, more than 160,000 Allied troops landed along a 50-mile stretch of heavily-fortified French coastline in Normandy, France. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower called the operation a crusade in which, “we will accept nothing less than full victory.” More than 5,000 Ships and 13,000 aircraft supported the D-Day invasion, and by day’s end, the Allies gained a foot hold in Continental Europe. The cost in lives on D-Day was high. More than 9,000 Allied Soldiers were killed or wounded, but their sacrifice allowed the Americans and her allies to begin the slow, hard slog across Europe.

Other than Fox, did you see any mention of this historic date in any of the mainstream media?  Neither did I.

And that's a shame.

But don't expect the hate-America-first media to remind us of the heroics and sacrifice that 18, 19 and 20-year old American boys made that day and in the months following.  Rather, watch some movies and series that were superb in production, historical accuracy and message.  I'd recommend these: Saving Private Ryan, Band of Brothers, The Longest Day.

It's ironic that Hollywood honors this historic day and the men behind it, but the so-called media will not, and does not.  These films put this event into the proper perspective without propaganda or  slant,

It is history.  And history should be remembered.

Memorial Day: North and South

On Memorial Day, most folks look forward to a day off from work, and maybe some steaks and burgers on the grill with friends and family.  Oh, and a few adult libations.  And yes, from time to time they remember fleetingly,  acknowledging all those Americans who gave their all to America.  But there's a couple of interesting things about Memorial Day that most folks don't know about.

Memorial Day began as a Confederate holiday in 1866, the year following the end of the War of Northern Aggression, which was then called Decoration Day.  Wesley Pruden describes it in this way.

The ladies of Columbus, Georgia, went to the graveyard with broken hearts to decorate the graves of their husbands, sons and brothers who had died defending hearth and home from the depredations of old William Tecumseh Sherman on his infamous march from Atlanta to the sea.

The ladies of Columbus decorated the graves with flags and flowers in remembrance of what love and sacrifice had wrought. They decorated the few Union graves among their dead with flowers, too. “They were cruel,” said one of the ladies of the Yankee invaders, “only to be true to their cause.” This simple act of generosity was quickly noted by several important newspapers in the North.

“The action of the ladies on this occasion,” said the Daily National Intelligencer in the nation’s capital, “in burying whatever animosities or ill feeling may have been engendered in the late war towards those who fought against them, is worthy of all praise and condemnation.” The Cleveland Daily Leader agreed: “The act was as beautiful as it was unselfish, and it will be appreciated in the North.”

And so Decoration Day became a day of remembrance and reconciliation across the land, later to be called Memorial Day, and still, particularly in the small towns of the South, a day of decorating graves of Confederate soldiers of the War Between the States with flowers and flags.

Memorial Day embraces the sacrifice of all Americans, and Confederates as well, and those brave men would not understand or condone the tearing down of statutes that memorialize those sacrifices, nor of the petty act of breaking out the tiny images of Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee from the stained glass windows in the Episcopal Washington National Cathedral in Washington DC.  Despicable.

Another interesting national concern arising from the ashes of that terrible war was the implementation of a civilian rifle proficiency program.  In reviewing the casualty statistics of the war, the Union brass realized that the Southerners, being primarily agrarian, were expert sharpshooters, while the Northerners were largely city boys, and were not very good shots at all.  Dismayed by the lack of marksmanship shown by their troops, Union veterans Col. William C. Church and Gen. George Wingate formed the organization in 1871.  As the the military is drawn from the citzentry, it was decided that it was past time to teach American civilians how to shoot, and shoot well.  The primary goal of this new association would be to "promote and encourage rifle shooting on a scientific basis," according to Col. Church.

And with that decision, the National Rifle Association was born.  Today, the NRA encourages shooting sports, promotes and defends the Second Amendment, advocates for political activism, and teaches gun safety, pre-licensing education for states' concealed carry permits, and gunsmithing. The NRA enjoys huge popular support, especially as the left continues to seek the abolition of the Second Amendment and the universal cconfiscation of all guns   In fact, over six million Americans are dues paying members of the organization, many for precisely this reason.   

Molon Labe.

The Great Censorship Movement

It appears that the great Censorship Movement is very much alive and well, thank you.  And it's growing and thriving all over the world.  Let's just look at two examples, one in the UK, the other in the US.

Stateside, pretty much everyone has now come to understand that the real purpose of Facebook, what with Marky-Mark testifying - er lying - in front of congress recently, is to collect and sell data on its users.  But, they tell us, we're not politically aligned necessarily, and we don't censor conservative voices.  Gee,  they say, we don't do bias here at Facebook, we want all sides heard.  OK, that's what Facebook's management wants you to believe, anyway.  But the reality is something quite different than the company's talking points.  Consider that one Matt Margolis, a best selling author, regularly uses Facebook ads for promoting his books.  Now several of those books are exposes on the evil and corruption in the Kenyan's regime, er, administration.  According to PJ Media, 

The last time he tried to advertise his latest book, The Scandalous Presidency of Barack Obama, on Facebook they banned him for a week for "spamming." Facebook never explained how paying for advertising and then distributing that ad in conservative groups is "spamming." Now Facebook is doing it to him again. This time Margolis attempted to buy an ad for the re-released and updated version of his first smash hit, The Worst President in History; The Legacy of Barack Obama. After filling out the appropriate form, Margolis received this response from Facebook: "Your ad was not approved because your Page has not been authorized to run ads with political content. What to do: Complete the authorization process."

So,in order to engage in commerce by selling his book, Margolis started the long and arduous process to "authorize" the ad.  The ad, mind you, represents income to Facebook.  But nope, we can't have an ad promoting a book that exposes the corruption of our Dear Leader The Kenyan.  Even if we loose money by doing so.  But wait, in fairness, Facebook did - sorta - agree to run the ad if only Margolis would give Facebook his home address, a copy of his driver's license (both sides), and his social security number.  Right.  That should do it.  Now let's be clear: with the revelation of what Facebook really does with your private information, I'm sure any trusting soul would gleefully render his driver's license and his social security number without question.  And neither did Matt Margolis.  So if you're a conservative, and you write conservative books - especially if they are unflattering to the Kenyan or his gal Hill - you have zero chance of buying ad space on Facebook.  Censorship?  Hell, yeah.

Tommy Robinson arrested for showing the truth

Or how about the unbelievable case of Britain's Tommy Robinson across the pond in the UK?  On Friday, the saga of Tommy Robinson entered a new chapter.  British police officers pulled him off a street in Leeds, where, in his role as a citizen journalist, he was live streaming a Facebook video from outside a courthouse. Inside that building, several defendants were on trial for allegedly being part of a so-called "grooming gang," a group of men, almost all Muslim, who systematically rape non-Muslim children, in some cases hundreds of them over a period of years or decades and in so doing prepares them for a lifetime of sexual slavery.  Forced prostitution.  But rather than focus on the heinous crimes of these Muslims animals, the British government found it more expedient to charge, arrest and incarcerate the journalist.  No trial.  No appeal.  Straight to prison for thirteen months.  Consider that because the vast population of prisoners are Muslim, our Mr. Robinson has a very good chance of becoming dead before his sentence ends.  That's British injustice for you.  Worse, yesterday there were protests from large crowds of angry Brits who recognized the application of George Orwell's warnings in his book 1984.  Protests were held at 10 Downing Street, as well, and those citizen concerns have also fallen on deaf ears.  Haven't heard of this, you say?  Well, it's because some heavyweights have essentially instituted a complete media blackout on it.  Of my British cousins I ask, doesn't Neville Chamberlain's infamous policy of appeasement teach you anything about the proper way to deal with tyranny?  It seems to me that the Nazi threat of then is the same as the Muslim threat of today.

So isn't it curious, that on two separate continents, in two separate cases of ham-fisted censorship, we find that the truth about Muslims - whether outed or closeted - are so tyrannically implemented?

Actually, I think it tells us a lot.

What Feminism Hath Wrought

Feminism as a concept is a pariah on the American culture. Whatever the goal of feminism was in the beginning of that movement many years ago, it certainly isn't the same now.  Back then the feminazis - shrill, ugly hags who couldn't get dates -  just wanted equality with men, or so they said.  But today feminism seeks to make men more feminine and women more masculine, and thereby turn the whole idea of the vive la différence of the sexes upside down.  And they've been damn good at doing so, too.

Gender confusion has been one such result.  Now we must deal with - what? - maybe six or so types of sexuality?  Kids as young as five or six years old are being taught that their sex is fluid.  Mom, I feel kinda girly today.  I call BS.  Biological science is pretty straightforward in confirming that - even today - there are only two sexes.  Yeah, the fetus begins as female, and depending on which X or Y chromosome it gets, may stay female or become male.  I get that.  But except for the rare case of being born a Hermaphrodite, one is either male or female. Sorry, snowflakes, the science is settled.

As the cultural misandry spreads and men become, well, something other than men, we're advised by the feminists that men are unnecessary in the family.  Dads are ejected from the family unit to allow the woman to "grow," whatever that means.  I guess it means that male children grow up without a strong, reliable father role model, and either seek sexual transformation, or shoot up a school.  To the misandrist, that's called "progress."   Destroyed and decimated families with dysfunctional children are another fine result of modern feminism.

Perhaps feminism is simply trying to emulate Islam, in which one sex has total and tyrannical control over the other.  In the Muslim world, "a woman's rights" is an oxymoron.  Here in the west, feminism seeks to apply a reversal of  that notion in the woman's favor.  The result is movements such as MGTOW, where men just refuse to have anything to do with women.  Personally I like women in general, I guess because I'm an archaic chivalrous male heterosexual.  But even I was stunned the other day when this issue came up unexpectedly.  I was yakking with my mechanic and a retired chap who was hanging around.  This guy said he had little to do except loiter around the shop.  I jokingly said, "You need a woman, man!"  Both my mechanic and this fellow - in unison - loudly and affirmatively decried such a notion.  No, they're not homos, they're just battle-weary guys tired of the constant chaos that is part and parcel of having a modern feminist woman in their lives.  Another result of modern feminism is men simply avoiding the shrill sex.   A consequence of that is noted by the birth rate in this country is down dramatically.

Want more?  How about the rise of things like Rosie O'Donnell's vicious observations?  Or the idiotic #MeToo thing, where women who use their charms - and are rewarded as expected - suddenly are appalled that they were successful in getting what they wanted?  Or the unstoppable murder of millions of babies every year through Panned Butcherhood, the darling of the radical feminists?

But the topper is this:  Millennial women say that they are repulsed by the effeminate girly-boys that several decades of castration has produced.  They love the idea that the difference between boys and girls has become blurred, that's cool, but they just don't want to date one.   Or marry him.  Those ingrained biological urges that demand women seek a strong and stable man keep bubbling to the fore, despite the feminist indoctrination.  In fact, studies a few years ago revealed that the more society accommodated women, the less happy and fulfilled they became.

So, man-bun, get a trim and grow a pair if you want to be desirable to women as a human male. You won't get your foreskin back, but at least it's a start.  And faddishness aside, biology will triumph.

For the rest of those men waiting for the sexual culture to stabilize into normalcy, maybe soon there will be no need to deny "You need a woman, man!"

More Winning

Winning isn't everything; it's the only thing.  Vince Lombardi said that.   This administration is winning so much, it has almost run out of promises.   That's a good thing.  DJT has made good on nearly every promise he made during the campaign.  Well, okay, we're still working on the wall.  Have patience. 

But one of the most notable accomplishments that has been made is not a policy change, or a tax cut, or massive job creation, or reuniting the races, or abandoning self destructive deals, or recognition of some pet issue from one of the snowflake identity politics groups.

Nope, the most amazing things is his recognition and identification of the nation's enemies, both foreign and domestic.  Consider the intestinal fortitude - that means guts - it takes to do something like that.  But as the late great F. Lee Ermey has observed, sometimes guts is all it takes.  Gunny is right.  And Donald J. Trump has guts.

As the so called religion of peace continues with its policy of murdering everyone and anyone in sight, and that includes some 14 million other Muslims Muslims have killed since the dawn of this new enlightened century, Trump's efforts have reduced the Islamic State and its adherents from a caliphate to just a consortium of lone-wolf insane malcontents.  If they're happy killing each other, I'd like to support that effort.  Let me know when the last one is left; I'll take it from there.  But the media mafia and their cohorts in the Democrat party go apoplectic over an American President realizing that Islam is an existential threat, not only to individuals of all creeds, but to the Western way of life.  Oh, and to Christians, too.  But Trump knows this, and says so, and seeks to ban Islam from the US just as have Poland, Russia and Japan.  And that's wise.  

Domestic enemies include the Deep State, that swamp of lawyers, lobbyists, and other unelected bureaucrats who run things outside - and out of sight - of the will of the people.  Remove them.  Fire them.  Charge and arrest them if necessary.  The damage they have done is evident by the exposure of the corruption at the FBI and the Department of Justice.  Those folks were political hacks that sought to overturn the results of a fair and legal election.  Rather than go quietly into that good night after the election, these denizens of the swamp chose to corrupt two (or more) of America's most trusted institutions.  And the Kenyan's Marxist/Islamic will is writ large over all of this nonsense and corruption.  And Trump has rightly called them out over it.  Some of these hacks may yet see prison time.

Foreign enemies, like our friend Rocket-man, Dear Leader of North Korea Kim Jong Un, have seen the light of what a strong, powerful and determined foe can be.  Trump politely asked Kim to dispense with all the nuclear threats and posturing.  Or else bad things are gonna happen to you.   We have two naval fleets on either side of you, and this will be over in less than two hours.  And I don't bluff.  Lunch? 

Further, I think Kim got a reality check when the last NoKo nuke test blew up an entire mountain, seismically destabilizing the whole peninsula.  Right Kim, that was way too much gun.  Now, Kim can't do enough to make nice with the US.  Hey, y'all come on over and watch as I take apart our nuclear capability okay?  Sure, Kim, we'd be happy to do that.

So President Trump is only eighteen months into his first four year term, and judging by the rumbling on the street - that's the vibe that it's clear that most Americans have had enough of the left's constant maniacal witch hunt - there's a lot more winning coming.  Even pollsters are seeing that not only will there be no blue wave, the midterm tsunami will be red, white and blue Americans.  Even the worst of the worst talking heads at NBC, ABC and CNN are grudgingly admitting that DJT is not only right, but he will be proven to be a Great President.

So, yeah, I like winning.  And, if you'll forgive just a little schadenfreude here, I love it when Hillary admits she just can't come to terms with loosing.  

If only the Kenyan would go away forever, and take our gal Hill with him.

The rest of America will keep on winning.

Be As The Yogi

In modern Western circles, the word "yoga" conjures up images of lithe, young babes stretching and bending in torturous positions.  And that type of yoga is the method by which training and strengthening of the body is accomplished.  That process is called Hatha Yoga.  But there are other yoga methods, and one in particular, seeks to strengthen the mind and enlighten the spirit, and that's Raja Yoga.  One who practices yoga may be called a yogi, 

Defining Yoga is tricky, as defining any spiritual discipline can be, but in short we can say it's a total discipline for seeking enlightenment. To reach a level of enlightenment, one must train body, mind and spirit.  There are no shortcuts to enlightenment; it's a lifelong commitment.  According to the Yoga Alliance website:

Yoga was developed up to 5,000 years ago in India as a comprehensive system for well being on all levels: physical, mental, emotional and spiritual. While Yoga is often equated with Hatha Yoga, the well-known system of postures and breathing techniques, Hatha Yoga is only a part of the overall discipline of Yoga. Today, many millions of people use various aspects of Yoga to help raise their quality of life in such diverse areas as fitness, stress relief, wellness, vitality, mental clarity, healing, peace of mind and spiritual growth.

Yoga is a system, not of beliefs, but of techniques and guidance for enriched living. Among Yoga’s many source texts, the two best known are the Yoga Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita. Both explain the nature of—and obstacles to—higher awareness and fulfillment, as well as a variety of methods for attaining those goals. 

Because of this, you could say that yogis don’t really belong to a certain “religion."  Rather, they are beyond it. Many people of various religions, or even those that have their own private nonsectarian spiritual practices, could be considered a yogi.

The takeaway here is that there exists an ancient and proven system that anyone may employ to help rise above the petty, nasty and destructive influences that are perpetually injected into our lives.  You don't have to become Hindu to take advantage of this system.  It's personal system that doesn't intrude on or contradict any other belief system; in fact it can, and probably will, enhance one's existing spirituality.

So when trying to deal with - and comprehend - the insanity that passes for current events in today's world, engage in a little spirit lifting.  As the great philosopher and sage Wei Li once said, "You can't change the world, but you can change your reaction to it."  Happiness begins there.  If for you that's the physical Hatha, fine, do that.  If it's the more meditative and spiritual Raja, do that.  Or do both. 

But do take some time to cleanse yourself of the negativity that you'll find in daily life.  You might find that things become easier for you.  Or that people are not as cumbersome for you. Or that you're somehow a little happier.  The concept of controlling oneself is not new, and many, if not most, religious teach some of these concepts.

So save your sanity; be as the yogi.  It works.

Namaste!

The War Between And Among The States

Back in the middle of the nineteenth century, a war broke out between the several states over what role, that is to say how much power, the federal government should have over the rights of individual states.  Four years and 600,000 lives later, it became clear that it would be a lot, as the Constitution took a sharp turn toward centralized federal power.  Folks in the north called it the Civil War.  Folks down south refer to it as the War Between the States, or the War of Northern Aggression.  The later is probably the most apt.

Fast forward one hundred fifty-eight years, and we're hearing the same kind of rumblings - discontent with how Washington DC is handling things. This time however, the issues are somewhat different, but the concern of how the far more controlling federal government is managing - or recognizing - states' rights is the same.  And this time, it's not so much North versus South as it is Left versus Right.  There is serious anger on both sides.  And both sides glare angrily at Washington.

In the last dozen years or so, primarily under the Kenyan's tyrannical reign, the left has become more emboldened, as well as radicalized farther and farther to the left; toward full blown Marxism.  The left wants to take the country all the way into tyrannical socialism.  The right wants limited government, and the preservation of the Constitution as it was written.  Racial tensions, again due to the Kenyan's prompting, have deteriorated to levels not seen in this country.  This time, though, it's the radical blacks who are spewing hate and divisiveness.  I've always acknowledged that human beings are essentially tribal in social settings, that is, folks like to be with other folks who are like them.  But that isn't racism.  That's familial bonding.  The hate and violence the left puts out comes in the form of groups like the Black Panthers, SPLC, BLM and Antifa, among others.  That's not tribalism; that's tyrannical racism.  It's hate, and it comes from the left.

Consider that California residents will be voting in November on a referendum that could split California into three separate states: NorCal, SoCal and Cal. They have over 600,000 signatures to ensure the Cal3 initiative will be on the November ballot.  A deeper look into the genesis of this movement will reveal that the great divide in political outlooks within the state are irreconcilable, or so it would seem - at least to six hundred thousand Californians.  While a divorce is sometimes the first thing warring factions consider,the result of separation could be devastating, both fiscally and politically.

Even South Carolina, noted for secession, is feeling the pain of creeping Federal tyranny. Several representatives have introduced a bill that would allow an open debate about the pros and cons of seceding from the Union should gun confiscation become law.

Some on both sides of the issue have said that there can be no reconciliation between the two; that a divorce is not only necessary, but desirable.  The USA must be split into separate countries that embody local citizens' political stance.  They maintain that this is necessary because there is no way the two - left and right - can come to a compromise.  Individual freedom on the right is incompatible with centralized socialism of the left.

But that aside, I propose that the United States be preserved for several reasons.  First, the logistics involved in such a division are staggering:  we're dealing with political points of views, rather than geographical identity.  Second, in the history of man, this miraculous experiment in self government has demonstrated itself to be the best yet devised.  Why destroy that, especially in order to placate the insane ideas of the radical left? The left can't be reasoned with.  They want the complete destruction of the ideals of Judeo-Christian values, limited government, and individual freedom upon which the United States was founded.  Nothing else will do.  There's no point in giving them half the country; it wouldn't satisfy them at all, anyway.  Think of the ramifications of having a hostile nation on your border.  Ask Israel or Poland or Hungary how that feels.

The only solution to this ideological divide the country is facing is the elimination of one side or the other.  Period.  Total defeat or total victory.  The left and all of its manifestations is a clear and present danger to the American way; it's an enemy within the gates.  No civilization can withstand an internal enemy. The left must be defeated at the ballot box, in social media, in the schools, in the streets, and by any means necessary.  We can't be squeamish, because given the chance, annihilation is exactly what the left has planned for the rest of us.

So be prepared, a showdown is imminent.  The left won't stop, and sooner or later, planned civil disruptions will be occurring in your very own front yard.  The fate of the nation - and the last best hope for mankind - is literally at stake.  Freedom is often taken for granted by those who never have had to fight for it.  And it can disappear forever if that fact is ignored.  Maintaining the American way of life means defending it.  And that means by force of arms if necessary.  We need to be vigilant, informed, and strong. And we need to be ready.

Our confederation of individual states must be preserved as the beacon of freedom that it is.  And the enemy within must be vanquished.

"Did You Get My Check?"

That's the burning question Facebook's Dear Leader Marky-Mark Zuckerberg will be asking members of the House committee next week, as he testifies before congress about Facebook's questionable handling of member's privacy issues.  But that's little surprise to normal Americans who shake their collective heads at the corruption that occurs between the Deep State and the so-called Titans of Technology.

But as USA Today reports, it's true.  I quote from www.westernjournal.com:

The congressional panel that received the most contributions from the company is the House Energy and Commerce Committee, whose lawmakers are set to question Zuckerberg on Wednesday.  Of the 55 members on this committee, all but nine of them have received contributions by Facebook for the past decade, with the average Democrat receiving nearly $6,750 and the average Republican receiving $6,800.

Panel members announced their committee would question Zuckerberg to shed light on what they call “critical consumer data privacy issues and help all Americans better understand what happens to their personal information online.”

They also said they appreciate Zuckerberg’s “willingness to testify.” In regards to Facebook’s campaign gift, however, Republicans got a mere 33 percent and Democrats got 65 percent, adding to about $7 million worth of gifts.

As we've posted here previously, part of the issue is the selling of information mined from users' profiles and posts that is used in political campaigning.  There was little interest in Facebook's normal business model when that detailed information was sold to the Kenyan's reelection efforts in 2012, but all hell broke loose when the Donald Trump campaign did the same thing in 2016.  Now the Democrats in Congress are in high dudgeon that  - gasp! - the Republicans should be able to access that business model's data for their own purposes as well.  Fair only works one way in the democrat mind.

The other issue, and probably more sinister, is the more than seven thousand fake Facebook accounts that were run by Russian operatives - the infamous trolls.  They would upload provocative posts, and when users "liked" them, the trolls would collect that data, and recruit those members to rally or protest or otherwise engage in political discourse.  All propaganda aimed at the expense of American interests, of course.

One such piece of propaganda is seemingly all-American on its face.  See image (right).  Posted on Facebook's Instagram, it seeks to elicit anger against the Muslim invasion.  How could any red-blooded American not agree with that?  It got 6,000 "likes."  But, friends and neighbors, it was a Russian plant.  Untold in this story - yet, anyway - is what happened to all the information contained on all those 6,000 Facebook users who "liked" that post.  Are they targets for Russian/Marxist/Leftist retribution?  Or perhaps recruitment?  Or is their personal information just stored, ready to be accessed and used at some other time?  I don't know, either.

But I do know that whenever you cede power over yourself to others, it will invariably be used against you.  Keeping your own personal power is what freedom is really all about.   And within the whole of mankind's history, there always have been forces that seek to relieve you of that power.  And only the vigilant and wary can resist.

And that's some of the issues - hopefully - that Marky-Mark and his Facebook data monster will have to address.

Right after he verifies that those in congress got his check.