Does The Media Lie?

I'm always amused, in a cynical way, by the disingenuous American media.  There are significant threats to Americans and the American way of life in the world, to be sure, but it's sadly amusing what stories the American media chooses to report.  That constitutes lying by omission.  Take for instance the boy-and-the-gorilla story.  That's a tragedy, and because of some woman's carelessness, a magnificent primate had to be killed.  Sad.  But despite hours of video on news channels, the story was initially rather thin.  Who was the caretaker of a 4 year boy?  Why did she allow him to get near the barricades?  What was the gorilla's motivation?  His intent?  Why isn't the cause of this clearly avoidable accident analyzed?  What is being hidden?  You can see how a viewer may be cynical about the "real" story here, as opposed to just taking sides in the emotional boy-versus-gorilla hype.  Good, boy, bad gorilla?  Or is it poor gorilla, misbehaved boy?  But now we know a little more, and the pieces fall into place as we suspected they would. 

Maybe it's a distraction story.  Put out there so we the news consumer don't get too emotional about the other true threats to us.  Like the Muslim invasion, or the Kenya's fecklessness.  In his final months as Dear Leader, he goes about the world apologizing for what he perceives as America's misdeeds.  For example, on the very eve of Memorial Day, he essentially apologizes to Japan for the US decision to drop atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  It's literally insane for him to do such a thing.  Seventy years ago Japan was an enemy, a brutal, vicious empire, and was defeated in a war.  Today Japan is an ally, evolving in that time from a near feudal monarchy to a vibrant, successful democratic nation.  Why apologize for saving a people from obliteration?  Further, Japan has never apologized for its brutal, aggressive conduct during the first half of the twentieth century.   But our homosexual mulatto Dear Leader feels it necessary for the leader of the United State to apologize to Japan for winning a war.  Had those bombs not been deployed, the US and allied armed forces would have had to invade Japan's main islands, at a staggering cost in lives and treasure on both sides.  My father was in the US Navy in the Pacific Theater in 1945, and was slated to be in the vanguard of that assault.  Chances were good that he would not live through it.  So from my perspective, I'm glad Truman made that historic decision, and Dad was able to come home and have a family, like probably a half million other US servicemen.  Otherwise, I and thousands of others, wouldn't be here.

Another threat to the US that the media conveniently avoids is the Islamic jihad that seeks to conquer the world under a Caliphate compliant with sharia law.  As the Kenyan goes behind Congress's back, and in defiance of the courts' prohibition, he lawlessly imports thousands more jihadists and other terrorists into the country.  Why would the media be silent about a story like that?  Could it be because the Muslim Brotherhood has operatives in the Kenyan's administration, which is already highly sympathetic to Islam?   And could it be because the media is merely a mouthpiece - a propaganda arm -  for the Kenyan and his policies?   Decidedly so.

Freedom of the press is defined as "The right to circulate opinions in print without censorship by the government."  And yet this government nonetheless influences the the compliant media to the detriment of the news consumer.  Dissemination of misinformation and disinformation is, by definition, lying. either by commission or omission.  Therefore, the press lies, by both omission and commission.  But readers of the alternative media already knew that.

Say It Ain't So, Brad

Brad Thor (l), Glenn Beck (r)

One of my all time favorite authors, Brad Thor, recently made some curious and outrageous statements on air.  Wednesday, on the Glenn Beck Radio Program, he and host Glenn Beck discussed their fear that a Trump presidency would cause irreversible damage to the country and the American way of life.  They fear, presumably because of Trump's bombastic personality, that he would govern by edict and essentially shred the Constitution.

Are you kidding me?  Nothing like that has been going on for the last seven and a half years, has it?  Where were these defenders of freedom when the Kenyan revealed himself to be the first totalitarian dictator in American history? How can a man like Brad Thor, whose fictional hero Scott Harvath, who epitomizes the anti-authoritarian alpha male, not recognize the difference between Trump and the Kenyan?  The contrast between the two is glaring:  Trump's an unmistakable alpha male, who loves beautiful women.  The Kenyan is an effeminate homosexual who loves transsexuals.

Nonetheless, Thor asks the hypothetical question of what patriot will step up to ensure that freedom continues to ring by "taking out" Trump were he to be elected president. Whoa. That's pretty harsh.  Had they exchanged the word "Trump" for the Kenyan's name - either one or all of them -  in that broadcast, the Secret Service would be kicking in the studio doors in ten seconds flat!

Given that Beck has had his moments of questionable mental lucidity in the last few years, one doesn't expect this kind of nonsense from someone like Brad Thor.  It's obvious that a good deal of Trump's appeal is that he says what's on his mind, despite whether it's politically correct.  Political correctness is censorship, pure and simple, and by not only ignoring political correctness, but mocking it, Trump heralds the return of freedom of expression, and that resonates with the American people.

So Brad, I can think of several folks - both male and female alike - who need killin', as the old saying goes, who have done irreparable harm to the country and so far have suffered no consequences. But Donald Trump isn't among them.

Hillary For Women's Rights? Ask A Mulim

Hillary likes to say she's the champion of women's rights.  Right.  Ask the ladies Bubba Bill has known.  She's got the gender card, we're told, and she's ready to play it.  Yet in the same breath, she advocates for the US to "do more" in helping poor, war-weary Muslim refugees invade - er, migrate - into the US.  And therein lies the contradiction.  There are no women's rights for Muslims, yet our gal Hill wants to import even more barbaric sharia law followers into the country.

Multiple reports have documented how mass Muslim migration into the United States has brought with it unique challenges to assimilation.  Muslims are the fastest growing bloc of immigrants into the United States, according to a 2015 report from the Center for Immigration Studies. U.S. Census data reveals that Arabic and Urdu – Pakistan’s national language– are the fastest-growing foreign languages spoken at home by U.S. residents. Arabic is now the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of recent refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

Last year, filmmaker Ami Horowitz interviewed Muslim residents of the Cedar Riverside section of Minneapolis, many of whom said that they would prefer to live under Sharia law. As CBS has reported, “The Cedar-Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis is sometimes called ‘Little Mogadishu’ given that it is the center of the nation’s largest concentration of Somalis.” CBS notes that the area is also fertile ground for Islamic terrorist groups recruiting new fighters.  Really.  Ya think?

Coming Soon To Your Town

Mass Muslim migration into the United States has also brought with it some troubling implications forr women’s rights within the U.S.  Europe in general, and Germany especially, is now experiencing a massive crime wave by created by Muslims.  In every crime category statistic, especially rape and sexual assault, illegal immigrants and asylum seekers were massively and disproportionately over represented.  In the US, absurd practices such as "honor killings" have increased dramatically.  This sharia practice allows for the killing of women for such infractions as "disgracing" the family, or wearing "immodest" clothing. Women can be beaten, brutalized, humiliated, and even disfigured by their husbands or families for little or no provocation.  Welcome to sharia law.  And as always, Hillary has it wrong.

Peachy.  We understand that there exists a culture, if I may call it that, that is literally diametrically opposed to the United States' culture of personal freedom and responsibility as guaranteed by the Constitution. That cult is Islam as followed by its Muslim practitioners.  There can be no assimilation, as Germany has seen, and as Sweden has learned.   The two - a civilized culture and a barbaric cult - cannot exist together.  That's not opinion, it's a fact that's being verified in every country in the world. 

So, Hillary, you want women's rights?  There are none in Muslim countries.  So choose wisely.

Pope Francis: Whose God?

I was raised an Episcopalian. I'm christened, baptized and confirmed as an Episcopalian, as were my ancestors for literally hundreds of years. But not now. I remain a spiritual Christian, even though I have little, if anything, to do with the established Episcopal church. Why this sea change? Because of a radical homosexual Episcopal bishop - one Gene Robinson - who hijacked the church years ago, and virtually perverted every one of Christ's teachings in favor of a secular, homosexual themed dogma. Other protestant religions have gone that same route, Presbyterians, Methodists, and others, and lost membership in the process. The deep thinkers in the US bemoan the fact that, oddly enough, fewer Americans are going to church these days. How surprising. Americans want to find solace and comfort within the spiritual realm, not to be condescended to and talked down to with inane "tolerance", "inclusive", "egalitarian" and "multicultural" themes. I remember clearly that Christ taught us to be prepared to make hard choices, especially in discriminating between good and evil, and I'm sure most Christian Americans do so as well.

But comes now this Pope, reveling in the recent election of Sadiq Khan as the first Muslim mayor of London, and insists that mass Muslim migration is necessary for Europe to repopulate. He went on to blame Paris and Brussels for the Muslim attacks on those cities. Well, blaming the victim is a tired and true leftist tactic. As the supposed titular head of the Catholic Church, shouldn't the Pope be citing God and His love of mankind, rather than defending the followers of Allah, the ancient moon god? Apparently not. Suggesting that the West's “fear” of the Muslim invasion of Europe is partly based on a fear of Islam, he said, “ . . . there is a fear of Islam as such but of [IS] and its war for conquest, which is partly drawn from Islam. It is true that the idea of conquest is inherent in the soul of Islam. However, it is also possible to interpret the objective in Matthew's Gospel, where Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, in terms of the same idea of conquest.” Are you kidding me? He compares Jesus' proselytizing to Jihad's slaughter?

So that he is not to be confused in his admonitions against Christians in any way, those near the pontiff suggest that this Pope harbors anti-American views as well. Respected Vatican journalist John Allen says the Pope’s dislike of America and Americans springs from his Latin American origin and the fact that the “resentment of the U.S. is sort of mother’s milk across the region.” Allen cites various coups engineered by the the U.S. in Honduras, Chile, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic. There is a fair bit of petty jealousy that Latin America has always stood in the religious, political and economic shadow of the United States. Allen didn't mention the billions of US taxpayer dollars given in aid, though, nor the outright murderous corruption one may find in these countries. Obviously the Pope, like many other leftists, sees things one dimensionally.

So there it is. He's a leftist advocate rather than a spiritual leader. You can take a radical leftist out of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and make him Pope, the head of the world's 1.2 billion Catholics. Fine. But when one dons the sacraments of the Catholic Church, one must transcend the petty politics of common man and rise to a higher level of spirituality. That higher calling puts the Christian true God ahead of false prophets and third world national pride.

The War On God

If you wanted to destroy a nation from within, how would you do it?  Perhaps you would kick out the very underpinnings of the precepts on which it was founded, and let it come crashing down.  That's what's happening in the country right now, and if you're on the side of the Original Principals of the founding of this great nation, The United Stated of America, you're losing this cultural and religious war. 

Pope Francis: "We Must Breed With Muslims."

Those Original Principals included faith in God, family and moral values, and personal responsibility.  Our nation was born of Christian teachings, despite what the secularists say, and those Principals are being mocked and eroded at a frightening rate.  To demonstrate the depth at which the war has progressed, one needs only to quote the leader of the Catholic faith, Pope Francis himself, as he embraces Muslims and worships not God, but "tolerance" and multiculturalism. Pope Francis, who has taken in 3 Syrian Muslim refugee families into the Vatican but no Syrian Christian refugees, seems to think that the armies of Muslim migrants pouring into Western European countries are nothing to be concerned about. He is absolutely wrong, it is an economic and sociological disaster, and yet he even encourages interbreeding with them.  Islam has been - and still is - the sworn enemy of Christianity for millennia, and it's quite unnerving to see the faith's titular leader embrace not only that self proclaimed enemy, but the secularists as well.  

But there is a voice crying out in the secular wilderness.  One Robert Carnival Sarah (sar AH), who was appointed as Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments by Pope Francis in 2014, addressed hundreds of prominent Catholic clergy and lay people attending the 12^th annual National Catholic Prayer Breakfast Tuesday in Washington.  In what he called "portentous times" for the Catholic Church and for the world, Cardinal Sarah condemned same-sex marriage, transgender bathroom laws, and attacks on the family as "demonic".  "In your nation, God is being eroded, eclipsed, liquidated," he stated.  “All manner of immorality is not only accepted and tolerated today in advanced societies, it is even promoted as a social good.  The result is hostility to Christians and increasingly, religious persecution.  This is not an ideological war between competing ideas.  This is about defending ourselves, children and future generations from the demonic idolatry that says children do not need mothers and fathers. It denies human nature and wants to cut off an entire generation from God.”

God is being replaced in our country, thanks in part to the Muslim in Chief, with the God of the secularists, Tolerance, and the god of Islam, Allah the moon god.  The Episcopalians, the Methodists, the Presbyterians, the Catholics and others have all jumped on the pro-tolerance, anti-God bandwagon.  It's an in-your-face persecution and it's being accepted and embraced by many who may be ignorant of the ultimate consequences.  Under the guise of tolerance, fairness, and political correctness, this insidious blasphemy goes unrecognized by the masses who think only of what's "fair", rather what's morally right.  And because it's easy to persuade very young children, who have no practical knowledge of, or experience in, the way the world works, we have indoctrination rather than education.  And that's why Common Core seeks to accomplish two things: the aforementioned statist indoctrination, and the removal of influence from the parents.  The family must be neutered and rendered moot. And so far the dark side has done a pretty good job of it.

I'm not Catholic, but I must say, Cardinal Sarah has nailed it.  The Church’s challenge today is to “fight with courage and hope… and not be afraid to raise her voice to denounce the hypocrites, manipulators and the false prophets” who would lead the faithful astray.  “The battle to preserve the roots of mankind is perhaps the greatest challenge the world has faced since its origins,” Sarah said.  “Be prophetic, be faithful, pray” for the soul of America and to “help stem the tide of evil that is spreading throughout the world,” the cardinal exhorted. “For in the end, it is God or nothing.”

In a nation of freedom of religion, and of freedom of speech, why is mine repressed, and others' not?

Z-Man, The Gun And The Truth

Zimmerman's Kel-Tec 9

So George Zimmerman decided to auction his Kel-Tec 9 millimeter pistol to the highest bidder, and the enlightened castrati in media goes into shock. Even worse, he told the truth about Trayvon Martin and his parents' parenting skills.  They clearly failed to teach their son to be responsible for his own actions, and when the inevitable happened, tried to enrich themselves from his death.  The link above is just one example of far left wing biased reporting on this case. The facts, mostly ignored in favor of the emotional tragedy hype, is that back in 2012 the thug Trayvon Martin was casing upscale homes from their backyards at night with burglary in mind.  He was spotted, surveilled, reported and confronted by the neighborhood watch, and he subsequently physically attacked and beat up the watch, bashing the watch's head against the concrete curb.  In a case of karmic justice, the watch was armed and was able to reduce and defeat the attack thereby saving himself from certain death or great bodily harm.  The good guy wins over the bad guy.  But that wasn't the story that the media reported, because it didn't fit their regressive leftist diversionary narrative.  The story that came out was that an armed white guy murders an unarmed black teenager.  Lost again in that narrative is the lesson of personal responsibility.  

Ultimately Zimmerman was acquitted by the courts, justly so, but was judged and sentenced by those in the press. Successfully so, I might add.  Zimmerman is a hero to many, but the media still portrays him as a pariah.  He's divorced now, and jobless as well, and the media has another victim via their application of political personal destruction.  The Martin case, along with the Michael Brown case and the Ferguson riots gave rise to the Black Lives Matter radical racial movement.  Presented in the regressive media as merely a Negro-based reaction to so-called racial injustice, it's actually funded and backed by the Soros Group, which along with MoveOn.org, and other far left wing Alinskyite groups, have caused havoc and racial divisiveness for years.

So back to the gun.  Zimmerman put the gun up for auction to raise money to help fight entrenched media supported Soros funded subversive groups such as these.  One online gun auction site would have no part of it, citing controversy as its reason.  I've had unsatisfactory dealings with this site myself, and they are less than professional in my view.  Another site did take the auction, and reportedly got a bid of $138,900 for the little pistol.  So it remains to be seen if the buyer actually purchases the gun, and it remains to be seen if Zimmerman allocates all or part of the proceeds as he's stated.  But it's his to do with as he pleases, and it is a part of history in no small way.  So I hope the collector consummates the sale, and I hope Zimmerman uses at least some of the money to help fight lawlessness and left wing statism.  It's a proper thing to do, and it demonstrates personal responsibility.

More Blurring Of The Sexes

Just yesterday I posted a piece on the biological science of the sexes, pointing out how this notion of "confused gender identity" is a political construct.  Today, as I opened a new tab in my browser, I saw this statement under the Google search bar:  "Proud Supporters of the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia."  Really?  There is such a thing?  A day against fear of homosexuals and fear of transmissions?  Apparently so.  The link connects to a two-minute-plus YouTube video put out by the United Nations, which I suppose is to create "awareness" of the inequality imposed on those who are confused about their sex.  Poor souls.  I tried to watch the video, but it was buggy and constantly reloaded and started over again.  Maybe that's due to my connection, which is buggy because of once solid Verizon's decision to sell its internet operations to some rinky-dink outfit called Frontier.  Or it could be that it's just a sorry example of marketing by the UN and its vendors.  Either way, I couldn't see it all, and if you have the inclination, it's all yours to watch. 

So we need a day to honor the 0.03% of the populace too self absorbed to even figure out if they're male or female?  Poor souls.  Or is this another effort to create yet another victim class, so snowflakes like these can find a safe space from "phobic" folks like me and the remaining 99.07% of human beings in the world who know who they are? I guess that's the lesson the UN wants to teach in this new 21st century: "Know not yourself; Impose yourself on others."  Very zen.  Very enlightened.

Actually, Genitalia Does Equal Sex

It's always been a favorite tactic of the Regressive left to create words that imply a negative position.  George Orwell called it Newspeak.  Example:  I'm male and heterosexual.  I like women.  Decidedly so.  Wanna see my magnificent Y chromosome?   So because I'm normally sexually oriented, I'm therefore defacto homophobic.  And, with this new phobia just introduced today, apparently I'm transphobic as well, whatever the hell that means.  But it's all nonsense, of course.  Few people care if one is enamored of members of one's own sex, or if one dresses like a  . . . whatever.  The bedroom is private, and what one does in there is exclusively one's own business.  In public, however, that's an entirely different situation, and it absolutely does matter what you do in the presence of civilized folks and their children.    

So no one denies these self absorbed cupcakes whatever gets them off, that's their preference.  We do however, require that you not conduct your dalliances in public, nor aggressively shove your perversions in our face.  That's not freedom, you dolt, that's assault.  And maybe even battery.

Once the Kenyan and his band of identity-confused fellow travelers are no longer in the control room, I suspect we'll see a return to normal human civility.  The freaks of the world will be seen for what they really are, and rightfully returned to the carnival tents from whence they came.

Why The "Y?"

As we watch in horror, our Dear Leader The Kenyan issues "guidelines" to help confused mentally ill children be comfortable in their "gender identity crisis."  This nonsense translates into allowing biological males into biological female restrooms, among other nefarious things.  What can possibly go wrong?  Well, gee, everything.  [An aside here:  the word gender refers to grammar, despite its common usage in this matter.  If we're discussing biology, the proper word is sex, as in transsexual or sexual identity.]

One Pair of Chromosomes Of 23 In Human DNA

First, let's dissect the issue, starting with biological science. The Y chromosome is one of the two sex chromosomes in humans (the other is the X chromosome). The sex chromosomes form one of the 23 pairs of human chromosomes in each human cell. The Y chromosome spans more than 59 million building blocks of DNA (base pairs) and represents almost 2 percent of the total DNA in cells.  Each person normally has one pair of sex chromosomes in each cell, with the Y chromosome present in males, who have one X and one Y chromosome, while females have two X chromosomes.  It's the Y chromosome that defines maleness. One is either a male or a female, and it is biologically impossible to change that fact.  Modern medical science can alter physical appearance, hormones, and even add or remove genitalia, but cannot change the basic DNA sex chromosomes.

So, as God designed, each person is either a male with one X and one Y chromosome, or a female with two X chromosomes. That chromosomal blueprint determines one's biological sex.  But being advanced beings, we humans have a complex brain, which creates emotions.  And in some there can be a mental disruption, causing one to experience confusion as to what sex one may be.  That condition, and I'm speaking of transsexualism, is one of mental illness, not one of biological sex ambiguity.  According to numerous studies, it affects only .03% of the population, yet our Dear Leader sees fit to issue more edicts that penalizes the other 99.97% of Americans with absurd totalitarian laws such as the so called bathroom issue.

So what is the real goal behind this pseudo-science of transsexualism?  I see several.  And as with everything emanating from this godless administration, they're all political.  First is governmental totalitarian control; getting Americans used to being under government control in every single aspect of their lives, including dictating which restroom they may use.  Another is the forced breakdown of decency; of moral codes that have been in place in civilized societies for millennia.  So a man, who sees himself as a woman but is still biologically a man, replete with male genitalia, can simply enter a ladies room at will, and avail himself of any and all of his urges that may still be present.  How enlightened we are!  Yet ignored in all this enlightenment is the women and girls who want to go about their most private business privately.  And certainly not with males present.  And lastly is the assault on maleness itself.  The enlightened Regressive view is that maleness is responsible for all the evil and hurt in the world. The Kenyan hates what he is - and is not - in my view, and like so many other despots, his destruction, while aimed subconsciously at himself, adversely impacts us all.