Monday, June 06, 2016

Did We Forget?

DDAYPS6N_4_WEB
A View Into Death's Face
Seventy-two years ago today, an unimaginable eternity ago given today's culture, Allied Forces led by the Americans, stormed the heavily fortified beaches at Normandy, France.  Over thirty-six hundred Americans lost their lives that day in a matter of just a few hours, and 29,000 during the entire battle.  To put that in perspective relative to today's terms, that's 6 times as many Americans lost in the entire Iraqi War.  Six times the KIA, in a few hours.  Most of those survivors are gone now, but we promised we would remember their sacrifice that led to the year-long liberation of Europe, and ultimately the defeat of the Nazi ideology.  But have we remembered?  In the mainstream media, as well as in the alternative media, I found only one reference to D-Day:  Charles Schultz, creator of the Peanuts comic strip, remembered.  The strip today showed Snoopy swimming ashore amid the barricades.

Never Forget Why I Died Here
I guess that war was so long ago, and was fought over things that aren't meaningful today, that celebration of those 29,000 - and all the others on both sides who were killed  - just isn't worthy of remembrance any more.  Things like national sovereignty, personal freedom, and the forceful resistance of tyranny, are just  quaint ideas that are out of fashion today.  Today we celebrate only the Self, the center of being: the I, Me, Mine.  Self sacrifice for a greater good is long out of style; today's philosophy is to sacrifice all for Self.  We don't fight for a national identity; today we "fight" for multiculturalism, an ideological abomination that satisfies no one, and damages the psyche as well.  We "fight" for safe spaces, where the truth of the real world cannot reach nor harm us. We "fight" for an extreme minority of sexually confused individuals to dictate a new set of sexual and societal mores to the majority, in defiance of millennia of established cultural behavior.  And worse, to consider oneself a "patriot" or an "American" is to be ridiculed and demeaned by our enlightened betters.  But in any of the aforementioned "fights", did anyone actually make the ultimate sacrifice?  Was it a matter of such importance that one would lay down one's life for it?  No.  It's just background noise.  It's a distraction; a deviation from our normal, safe and secure lives.  It's just for a little excitement in an otherwise predetermined, boring life.

But when a new threat rears its ugly head here in the heartland, when a dirty nuke goes off in your city, or when a suicide bomber decimates a sporting event or a concert, you may get a dim realization of what seven million American men realized here in the heartland in 1941.  That there are things worth really fighting for:  your family, your way of life, your personal freedom, your country, and in this new 21st century, your God.

Friday, June 03, 2016

Civil War?

So you still think it's just hyperbole to say that the country is embroiled in a simmering civil war?  A war that's ready to break out into open conflict?  American versus American.  Hyphenated Americans versus culturally sound Americans.  Sexually confused Americans against everybody else.  Black Lives Matter against anyone who's white or a cop.  Media cartels versus free thought.  Schools versus parents.  If so, perhaps you may want to think again.  Consider these news stories from just this week:

Hillary Clinton, the most corrupt politician in American history, isn't yet indicted for high crimes and treason by selling political influence to the nation's enemies.  But her operatives are being deposed.  Cheryl Mills requested the video of her deposition by the FBI be sealed, and  Hillary's IT guru, Bryan Pagliano, takes the fifth after being granted immunity. Clinton's lawyers are striving to keep the Clinton Crime Foundation alive, while Judicial Watch and others are seeking an end to the Wall Street/Foreign Interests/Globalist espionage and corruption in the highest levels of the failed Kenyan's administration.  Selling influence to enemies, both as a public official and as a private citizen, is an act of war.

Image result for america at warFrom out of nowhere comes the fact that American deaths are on the rise.  Especially deaths of whites during the Kenyan's reign of terror and totalitarianism.  The Kenyan was supposed to end racial strife in the US seven years ago.  Instead of that and stopping the rising of the seas, this rabid totalitarian has incited a racial divide not seen for a hundred and fifty years.  The race war has begun, and is ongoing.

Trump supporters in San Jose are attacked after the rally by a mob of predominately Mexicans and LaRaza supporters who incited the violence.  American flags were burned as Mexican flags were raised, and many Trump supporters were brutally attacked and bloodied by these illegals.  The major, being the LaRaza dupe that he is, blamed the Trump campaign for, well, campaigning.  Even the police were attacked, and they retreated, leaving the American Trump supporters to their own defenses.  Even the soon-to-be-Baker Acted Glenn Beck, in an interview with noted author Brad Thor, insinuates that Trump's assassination may be a good thing. Open calls for murder, and warfare in the streets of America sure sounds like war.

On the pure propaganda front, it seems the aging supreme Jew globalist, George Soros, may pass on to eternal rest in the near future, but his anti-nationalist, open borders, globalist fantasies will live on in the new immaculated Jew, Mark Zuckerburg.  As you know, On Tuesday, it was announced that Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and YouTube will be working with the European Union (EU) to censor and “criminalize” perceived “illegal online hate speech” within 24 hours, as well as “promoting independent counter-narratives” that benefit the EU. The coordinated effort of social media giants acting to censor free speech  on a international basis is certainly war.

The importation of enemy foot soldiers into the US is most certainly an act of war.  But the Kenyan continues to neuter the Border Patrol on the southern border, while anti-American actors pour through.  Entering the US illegally are not just illegals seeking employment in the US, as the Kenyan would have us believe.  Oh, no.  We're talking about full blown fighters, who over the last few years have invaded, established, and collected themselves as an underground and invisible fighting force, ready to strike. Not just Mexican cartels, not just Mexican LaRaza anti-American  radicals, but Muslim jihadists from the Middle East, wending their way through the smuggler's silk road through Central America.  Still think there's no threat from Muslims through the southern border?  Where is, and who's got the suitcase nuke?  This is unmistakably war.

Image result for american courtsAnd last but certainly not least, is the assault on all things American by the judiciary.  Over the years the Supreme Court and other courts, have exhibited ever expansion of judicial power. The effect of decisions handed down has resulted in an attack on the American civil society that compels the nation to follow courses of development that, were they to be legitimate, would have emanated from the political institutions of the country, not from the legal institutions.  Legislating from the bench, un-elected  judges appointed for their political leanings rather than their judicial prowess, have changed the civil landscape for the worse, empowering leftist theory at the demise of the Constitution.  It remains to be seen if this trend can be stopped and reversed, even over decades to come.

And that, my friends, is truly an act of war.

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Does The Media Lie?

I'm always amused, in a cynical way, by the disingenuous American media.  There are significant threats to Americans and the American way of life in the world, to be sure, but it's sadly amusing what stories the American media chooses to report.  That constitutes lying by omission.  Take for instance the boy-and-the-gorilla story.  That's a tragedy, and because of some woman's carelessness, a magnificent primate had to be killed.  Sad.  But despite hours of video on news channels, the story was initially rather thin.  Who was the caretaker of a 4 year boy?  Why did she allow him to get near the barricades?  What was the gorilla's motivation?  His intent?  Why isn't the cause of this clearly avoidable accident analyzed?  What is being hidden?  You can see how a viewer may be cynical about the "real" story here, as opposed to just taking sides in the emotional boy-versus-gorilla hype.  Good, boy, bad gorilla?  Or is it poor gorilla, misbehaved boy?  But now we know a little more, and the pieces fall into place as we suspected they would. 

Barack ObamaMaybe it's a distraction story.  Put out there so we the news consumer don't get too emotional about the other true threats to us.  Like the Muslim invasion, or the Kenya's fecklessness.  In his final months as Dear Leader, he goes about the world apologizing for what he perceives as America's misdeeds.  For example, on the very eve of Memorial Day, he essentially apologizes to Japan for the US decision to drop atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  It's literally insane for him to do such a thing.  Seventy years ago Japan was an enemy, a brutal, vicious empire, and was defeated in a war.  Today Japan is an ally, evolving in that time from a near feudal monarchy to a vibrant, successful democratic nation.  Why apologize for saving a people from obliteration?  Further, Japan has never apologized for its brutal, aggressive conduct during the first half of the twentieth century.   But our homosexual mulatto Dear Leader feels it necessary for the leader of the United State to apologize to Japan for winning a war.  Had those bombs not been deployed, the US and allied armed forces would have had to invade Japan's main islands, at a staggering cost in lives and treasure on both sides.  My father was in the US Navy in the Pacific Theater in 1945, and was slated to be in the vanguard of that assault.  Chances were good that he would not live through it.  So from my perspective, I'm glad Truman made that historic decision, and Dad was able to come home and have a family, like probably a half million other US servicemen.  Otherwise, I and thousands of others, wouldn't be here.

muslim bros in the whitehouseAnother threat to the US that the media conveniently avoids is the Islamic jihad that seeks to conquer the world under a Caliphate compliant with sharia law.  As the Kenyan goes behind Congress's back, and in defiance of the courts' prohibition, he lawlessly imports thousands more jihadists and other terrorists into the country.  Why would the media be silent about a story like that?  Could it be because the Muslim Brotherhood has operatives in the Kenyan's administration, which is already highly sympathetic to Islam?   And could it be because the media is merely a mouthpiece - a propaganda arm -  for the Kenyan and his policies?   Decidedly so.

Freedom of the press is defined as "The right to circulate opinions in print without censorship by the government."  And yet this government nonetheless influences the the compliant media to the detriment of the news consumer.  Dissemination of misinformation and disinformation is, by definition, lying. either by commission or omission.  Therefore, the press lies, by both omission and commission.  But readers of the alternative media already knew that.

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Say It Ain't So, Brad

Brad Thor on Glenn Beck: ‘If Congress Won’t Remove’ Trump from White House, ‘What Patriot Will Step Up’
Brad Thor (l), Glenn Beck (r)
One of my all time favorite authors, Brad Thor, recently made some curious and outrageous statements on air.  Wednesday, on the Glenn Beck Radio Program, he and host Glenn Beck discussed their fear that a Trump presidency would cause irreversible damage to the country and the American way of life.  They fear, presumably because of Trump's bombastic personality, that he would govern by edict and essentially shred the Constitution.

Are you kidding me?  Nothing like that has been going on for the last seven and a half years, has it?  Where were these defenders of freedom when the Kenyan revealed himself to be the first totalitarian dictator in American history? How can a man like Brad Thor, whose fictional hero Scott Harvath, who epitomizes the anti-authoritarian alpha male, not recognize the difference between Trump and the Kenyan?  The contrast between the two is glaring:  Trump's an unmistakable alpha male, who loves beautiful women.  The Kenyan is an effeminate homosexual who loves transsexuals.

Nonetheless, Thor asks the hypothetical question of what patriot will step up to ensure that freedom continues to ring by "taking out" Trump were he to be elected president. Whoa. That's pretty harsh.  Had they exchanged the word "Trump" for the Kenyan's name - either one or all of them -  in that broadcast, the Secret Service would be kicking in the studio doors in ten seconds flat!

Given that Beck has had his moments of questionable mental lucidity in the last few years, one doesn't expect this kind of nonsense from someone like Brad Thor.  It's obvious that a good deal of Trump's appeal is that he says what's on his mind, despite whether it's politically correct.  Political correctness is censorship, pure and simple, and by not only ignoring political correctness, but mocking it, Trump heralds the return of freedom of expression, and that resonates with the American people.

So Brad, I can think of several folks - both male and female alike - who need killin', as the old saying goes, who have done irreparable harm to the country and so far have suffered no consequences. But Donald Trump isn't among them.

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Hillary For Women's Rights? Ask A Mulim

Hillary likes to say she's the champion of women's rights.  Right.  Ask the ladies Bubba Bill has known.  She's got the gender card, we're told, and she's ready to play it.  Yet in the same breath, she advocates for the US to "do more" in helping poor, war-weary Muslim refugees invade - er, migrate - into the US.  And therein lies the contradiction.  There are no women's rights for Muslims, yet our gal Hill wants to import even more barbaric sharia law followers into the country.

Multiple reports have documented how mass Muslim migration into the United States has brought with it unique challenges to assimilation.  Muslims are the fastest growing bloc of immigrants into the United States, according to a 2015 report from the Center for Immigration Studies. U.S. Census data reveals that Arabic and Urdu – Pakistan’s national language– are the fastest-growing foreign languages spoken at home by U.S. residents. Arabic is now the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of recent refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

Last year, filmmaker Ami Horowitz interviewed Muslim residents of the Cedar Riverside section of Minneapolis, many of whom said that they would prefer to live under Sharia law. As CBS has reported, “The Cedar-Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis is sometimes called ‘Little Mogadishu’ given that it is the center of the nation’s largest concentration of Somalis.” CBS notes that the area is also fertile ground for Islamic terrorist groups recruiting new fighters.  Really.  Ya think?

Muslims Pray at White House Evan Vucci  AP Photo
Coming Soon To Your Town
Mass Muslim migration into the United States has also brought with it some troubling implications forr women’s rights within the U.S.  Europe in general, and Germany especially, is now experiencing a massive crime wave by created by Muslims.  In every crime category statistic, especially rape and sexual assault, illegal immigrants and asylum seekers were massively and disproportionately over represented.  In the US, absurd practices such as "honor killings" have increased dramatically.  This sharia practice allows for the killing of women for such infractions as "disgracing" the family, or wearing "immodest" clothing. Women can be beaten, brutalized, humiliated, and even disfigured by their husbands or families for little or no provocation.  Welcome to sharia law.  And as always, Hillary has it wrong.

Peachy.  We understand that there exists a culture, if I may call it that, that is literally diametrically opposed to the United States' culture of personal freedom and responsibility as guaranteed by the Constitution. That cult is Islam as followed by its Muslim practitioners.  There can be no assimilation, as Germany has seen, and as Sweden has learned.   The two - a civilized culture and a barbaric cult - cannot exist together.  That's not opinion, it's a fact that's being verified in every country in the world. 

So, Hillary, you want women's rights?  There are none in Muslim countries.  So choose wisely.

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Pope Francis: Whose God?



I was raised an Episcopalian. I'm christened, baptized and confirmed as an Episcopalian, as were my ancestors for literally hundreds of years. But not now. I remain a spiritual Christian, even though I have little, if anything, to do with the established Episcopal church. Why this sea change? Because of a radical homosexual Episcopal bishop - one Gene Robinson - who hijacked the church years ago, and virtually perverted every one of Christ's teachings in favor of a secular, homosexual themed dogma. Other protestant religions have gone that same route, Presbyterians, Methodists, and others, and lost membership in the process. The deep thinkers in the US bemoan the fact that, oddly enough, fewer Americans are going to church these days. How surprising. Americans want to find solace and comfort within the spiritual realm, not to be condescended to and talked down to with inane "tolerance", "inclusive", "egalitarian" and "multicultural" themes. I remember clearly that Christ taught us to be prepared to make hard choices, especially in discriminating between good and evil, and I'm sure most Christian Americans do so as well.

But comes now this Pope, reveling in the recent election of Sadiq Khan as the first Muslim mayor of London, and insists that mass Muslim migration is necessary for Europe to repopulate. He went on to blame Paris and Brussels for the Muslim attacks on those cities. Well, blaming the victim is a tired and true leftist tactic. As the supposed titular head of the Catholic Church, shouldn't the Pope be citing God and His love of mankind, rather than defending the followers of Allah, the ancient moon god? Apparently not. Suggesting that the West's “fear” of the Muslim invasion of Europe is partly based on a fear of Islam, he said, “ . . . there is a fear of Islam as such but of [IS] and its war for conquest, which is partly drawn from Islam. It is true that the idea of conquest is inherent in the soul of Islam. However, it is also possible to interpret the objective in Matthew's Gospel, where Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, in terms of the same idea of conquest.” Are you kidding me? He compares Jesus' proselytizing to Jihad's slaughter?

So that he is not to be confused in his admonitions against Christians in any way, those near the pontiff suggest that this Pope harbors anti-American views as well. Respected Vatican journalist John Allen says the Pope’s dislike of America and Americans springs from his Latin American origin and the fact that the “resentment of the U.S. is sort of mother’s milk across the region.” Allen cites various coups engineered by the the U.S. in Honduras, Chile, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic. There is a fair bit of petty jealousy that Latin America has always stood in the religious, political and economic shadow of the United States. Allen didn't mention the billions of US taxpayer dollars given in aid, though, nor the outright murderous corruption one may find in these countries. Obviously the Pope, like many other leftists, sees things one dimensionally.

So there it is. He's a leftist advocate rather than a spiritual leader. You can take a radical leftist out of Buenos Aires, Argentina, and make him Pope, the head of the world's 1.2 billion Catholics. Fine. But when one dons the sacraments of the Catholic Church, one must transcend the petty politics of common man and rise to a higher level of spirituality. That higher calling puts the Christian true God ahead of false prophets and third world national pride.