Enemy At The Gate

At last someone is telling the truth about the mass invasion in this country, euphemistically known as illegal immigration.  I quote:

"All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it."

You may think - and rightly so - that this declaration was spoken by President Trump, but it wasn't.  Nor was it spoken by President Reagan.  Nope.  It was uttered twenty-three years ago by none other than President William Jefferson Clinton during his State of the Union address on January, 24th, 1995. My, my, have the Democrats changed their position on the cultural invasion!

Click on the link and the next time you hear Chuck U. Shumer babble on about the wall, immigration, DACA, Dreamers and the other unconstitutional policies the Kenyan enacted by his unlawful executive orders, remember these words. But wait!  Clinton was president before the Democrat party morphed into a totally Marxist philosophy, going all-in for identity politics.  In his day, democrats were comparable to today's moderate Republicans.  Today, however, democrats support invasion - er, immigration - because they need a perpetual underclass to play the role of "victims" of the so-called Caucasian patriarchy.  Uneducated, low IQ, diseased people with no marketable skills from third world shit hole countries are perfect for that role, whether they be black, brown or grey. And they make perfect Democrat voters - for life!

Immigration - legal and otherwise - has been a problem since Ted Kennedy changed the United States immigration policy with his Immigration and  Nationality Act of 1965.  Prior to that, the US policy was the Quota system, which essentially limited immigration to Western Europe.  Intelligent, educated white people with marketable skills were more than welcomed here.  But Kennedy saw the need for a permanent underclass, and was able to get his bill enacted by President John Kennedy, his brother.  See how that works?  Today we are dealing with nearly 36 million aliens, by some counts, most of whom are not productive in any legal sense, and who refuse to assimilate into our Western culture.  That means one-third of the US population is working hard to undermine and destroy the United States.  That's the bottom line, after all the weepy emotionalism is swept away. 

These people in our country are a problem.  And it's an existential one.  It's not about race.  It's not about social status.  It's about applying existing US law.  It's about neutralizing the threat of their planned destruction of the American culture and way of life.

Concerning illegals, we must identify, arraign and deport them all.  Literally with extreme prejudice.  Concerning legals, we must identify those here now, and take in only those who can and will contribute to the American experience, not tear it down.

And if Congress won't act, We the People must.  And I believe we will.

The End of Racism

At last!  The left has officially worn out the epithet "You're a racist!"  Every day, a thousand times, someone is called a racist.  It's a curse that's been over used, over blown, inappropriately applied and now rendered completely meaningless.  It's like "awesome," or one of my favorites,"gnarly," idioms finally cast onto the ash heap of meaningless rhetoric drivel.  And not a moment too soon.  

But what does it mean, in a larger sense, "racist," this neutered epithet?  Have people really rid themselves of all biases pertaining to race?  Not at all.  And, I dare say, nor should they.  People of all races, cultures and nationalities are essentially tribal in their outlook.  They are me. Or non sunt mei - they are not me.  One who is conscious of one's own origins is naturally wary of outsiders; one should be diligently discriminating in that regard. That's not a bad thing in of itself.  It's a natural component of our survival instinct.  Consider that your brain, when confronting a stranger, is making nanosecond evaluations to ensure your survival.  Is he different?  Is he dangerous?  And the decision tree falls away from that point on.  If yes, then appropriate measures are taken.  If no, none are.  If yes, but no, then a different set of possible measures are considered.  This mechanism in the brain happens pretty fast, so most people aren't even consciously aware they're doing it.   But that mid-brain analysis is there to keep you safe. And, it has nothing to do with hate.  

Basic decision tree

It has to do with recognizing differences, and reacting accordingly.  That's called discrimination.  Survival.  The left continually seeks to dehumanize people in any way it can.  Attempting to homogenize us all into a single artificial norm is one way to that end.  But they coat this homogenization with an emotional appeal that's hard to resist.  Aw, poor them.   They deserve better.  Come on over here, we accept you.

And that can be - and certainly is - exceedingly dangerous when applied to our immigration policy.  Some migrants truly are in need, most seek other goals. But to stand up and question the very real consequences of the unchecked influx of immigrants - who are assuredly non sunt mei -  is a rational act, and has nothing whatever to do with hate.  Or racism.  It's just another leftist-progressive con job.

Perhaps if we understand that we're being played by the left with its endless application of labels, like racist, intolerant, homophobic, islamaphobic, and countless others, we may be able to ignore those epithets, and think clearly and rationally about our survival. Nature programmed us this way for a reason.  The left's philosophies - which have never been right - claim we've evolved beyond that primal programming.  

I seriously doubt that.  It's deeply embedded in pure instinct, and denying that will result in a bad end.

Vicious Friends To The End

Well, well, well.  A new book is out.  In it are allegations about Donald Trump's temperament and intellect.  Same old stuff, warmed over.  Also in it are new allegations about who may be the White House leaker, the stirrer of political pots.  All eyes look to Steve Bannon.  "A moron," says Bannon of Trump.  "Sloppy Steve," tweets Trump.  Uh oh.  Seems like King Arthur is at odds with his Sir Lancelot.  Powerful men, both leaders in a tsunami political movement, butting heads like alpha rams in rutting season.  The MSM, delighted to observe the public reaction to Wolff's disingenuous ramblings, cry, "Hooray!  A rift in the movement!  Trump is undone!"

Nonsense.  Not so fast.  In every great undertaking, there have been failures in communication and policies in the chain of command, from ancient Greece (note Alexander's conquests) to Rome (note Julius Caesar's reforms), even into the early elections in the United Sates (note the Adams/Jefferson rift), and right up to the present age.  Consider that Winston Churchill fought tooth and nail against his own King and Parliament to dissuade them from a policy of appeasement with Nazi Germany.  Neville Chamberlain advised friend and foe alike that German ambitions were contained and it wouldn't attack the UK.  Germany wasn't, of course, and did.  History proved Churchill right, and Germany and the United Kingdom would be engaged again in war with each other.

Another example of rifts between players on the same team was the infamous public flogging of General George Patton.  Dwight Eisenhower was the Supreme Commander, Allied Forces, and General George Patton was Commander of the 3rd, 7th and 15 United States Armies at various times.  He defeated Rommel in North Africa, invaded and liberated Sicily, and was most famous for his push through France and Germany with the US 3rd Army, resulting in the liberation of Berlin.  Yet he and Ike were at odds for most of the war.  Both wanted to win, but had differing methods.  Ike was the commander of a force of individual nations - the Allies - and had to massage national hubris and personal egos for the duration of the war.  In contrast, Patton was a proponent of hard driving, never slowing offensives that, especially in Europe in 1944, probably shortened the war considerably.  At the edge of Berlin, Ike slowed Patton's 3rd Army's advance, so that the Soviets could be the first to enter Berlin.  That was a political move of which Patton disapproved entirely.  Patton was vocal about his opinions, and felt that the US should keep rolling eastward, and defeat Russian forces as well.  Hey, as long as I've got the Army over here and all.  Ike and the media were completely aghast over that.  History may well have shown that Patton was probably right about his trepidation about the USSR.  Promoted, demoted, and hushed, Patton was still admired by both his men and by the public at large, despite the Pentagon's and media's attempt to portray him as a arrogant, war-mongering self-serving braggart.  But at the end of the day, it was George Patton and the American 3rd Army that liberated Europe.  Ike went on to become the United States' 34th President, and Patton died from injuries he sustained in a suspicious automobile crash months later in December 1945.

So it may be wise to keep in perspective this so-called divide between Bannon and Trump.  It is probably real, arising from two forceful personalities dedicated to making America great again, yet each in their own way.  Trump, like Eisenhower has many factions to appease.  Bannon, like Patton, sees only an enemy in tyrannical globalism that must be resoundingly defeated.  

As history shows us time and time again, heads may butt, punches may be thrown, but at the end of the day, hands will be shaken, and a victory will be had.  And this story hasn't come to its end, yet.  Stay tuned.

2017: The Good Guys Are Winning

As we close in on the traditional day of celebrating Christ's birth, we take a moment to reflect on the amazing year that is all but finished.  Consider the impact of these events, if you will.

The American people chose a political outsider to become their forty-fifth president, and the established duopoly went into apoplectic spasms. Blindsided by the American people's complete rejection of the decades long slide into a course of decline for America, they struck back with a near constant attack on Donald J. Trump, the man folks elected to stop said decline, and to further turn the tide.  Fearing loss of power, the swamp - defined as both party apparatchiks, the MSM and all those unelected bureaucrats, lobbyists and judges - is fighting back.  Cries for impeachment accompany a year long "investigation" into Trump's alleged collusion with Russia that some call a political witch hunt.  Meanwhile, Trump seems unaffected by the swamp's temper tantrum, and continues to work his agenda.  Even the Huffington Post, no friend of conservatism, has admitted the Donald's kicking ass.  He's appointed conservative judges, passed a milestone tax reduction act, limited the insane importation of Muslim terrorists, is in the process of unifying the GOP leadership, and has completely exposed the MSM as the propaganda arm of the Democrat party that they are.  Not bad for a freshman predient, and a political outsider, oh, and for a rich white guy.

Grand Inquisitor, er, I mean Special Prosecutor, Robert Mueller continues with his fishing expedition. In a twist worthy of a political spy thriller novel, what he's turned up so far is the massive corruption, sedition and treason that occurred on the Kenyan's watch.  In a recent damning expose by Politico, no friend of conservatism, it's been reveled that the Kenyan stopped a DEA undercover operation of cocaine smuggling by Hezbollah through central America and into the US.  He did this to ensure that his nuclear arms deal with Iran would go through.  Don't want to piss off the Mullahs while you're handing them the means to build their own nukes, now would we?  Oh, and let's free up a couple billion in Iranian frozen assets, so the Mullahs can buy some yellow cake and get their nuclear reactors up and running.   And while we're at it, let's pay the ransom demanded for a couple of embassy chaps for another four hundred million USD.  In cash.  On pallets.  Don't want that bribe going anywhere near congress.  Fly it over on a C-141.  Shhh.

And speaking of yellow cake, now there's more scrutiny of Mizz Clinton's collusion with the Russians to take control of some twenty-five percent of America's uranium production.  The Clinton Crime Family netted a pretty hefty commission for brokering that sweet deal.  And her antics in working with DNC's Debbie Wassermann-Schultz to take Bernie Sanders out of the nominating process.  The fix is in, Bernie.  Sorry.  You're an old Communist anyway, right?  No hard feelings.  Remember what happened to Seth Rich for developing a conscience?  Worse, Mizz Clinton has been committing crimes, treason and sedition in her role as Secretary of State as well as a private citizen.  Arms to Syria in a gun running operation gone bad was the catalyst for the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi, in which several Americans, including the Ambassador himself, were killed by the very terrorists she had just armed.   No reaction from the Kenyan's administration.  Dead Americans?  Meh.  And collusion with those very same terror organization were conducted on a private server, and when her emails were leaked by Wiki-leaks, that server got immediately Bit Bleached.  Oops. Nothing to see here.  But as Mueller continues to investigate Trump, the evidence he gathers continues to indict The Clinton Crime family, the DOJ under Eric Holder, The FBI under James Comey, as well as the Kenyan himself.

High crimes and misdemeanors?  Hey, it's the Kenyan-Clinton crime syndicate we're talking about here.  It's too big to fail.  Well, we'll see about that.

So all in all 2017 has been a rousing good year.  Good for the American people, good for the economy, and good for making American great again.  It wasn't so good for those who seek her destruction.  Or for those who who profit by it.  

But this crime novel is far from over.  Stay tuned.  And Merry Christmas to all!

The Parable Of The Garden

Once upon a time there was a kindly old man who had a wonderful and productive garden.  He had labored endlessly for months to make the soil rich and level, well drained and open to the air and sun.  He planted seeds that would grow to fruition, and he arranged them into communities that benefited one another.  Root vegetables on one end, bean and legumes in the center, and flowering vegetables on the other end.  It was an act of love and mutual benefit as he would attend to and nurture his crop, and the crop would prosper and thus reward him with its bounty. 

For years he nurtured it, protected it, and was rewarded by its bounty of delightful vegetables and fruit. From time to time a weed would invade, and grow quickly and aggressively.  It would compete for soil space, and soon, as it towered over the native plants, it would rob them of needed sunlight.  At first he would pull the weeds, and cast them aside.  The garden was clear and healthy.  But the weeds would propagate, and were relentless in their invasion.  Each day the old man would find more and more of them, at the edges of the garden, and even now in the interior.  He'd pull those he could find, but he couldn't get them all.  Worse, the weeds were able to spread, and their roots were strong and deep.  When the old gentlemen first noticed this, he thought little of it; after all it was only a few weeds in a rather large and productive garden.  But soon it became a daily effort to rid the garden of all the weeds.  The vegetables and fruits that he had planted began to weaken as the weeds slowly took over.  Stalks became weak from a lack of nutrients, those nutrients being aggressively absorbed by the ever increasing number of weed roots.  The leaves became yellowish and drooped due to the ever increasing weed canopy robbing them of sunlight.  And now insects, which were never a serious problem for a healthy garden, were now able to take advantage of the plants' weakened condition.

To rid the garden of all the invading weeds became an ever more arduous task for the old man.  They could reproduce and invade faster than he could pull them out.  And any roots that were not removed would sprout even more weeds, made stronger by their survival. Soon the garden was all but gone, now nothing but a tract of uncontrolled and spreading weed growth.  The old man lost his bounty as all his plants died, but insisted that the weeds were not to blame.  It was only their nature, after all, he would tell himself.  But in that attempt at self consolation, he had denied and nullified his own nature.  And that nature was to protect, defend and harvest the bounty of his own labors, and for his benefit solely.  

And in that misinterpretation of the world as it truly is, the old man lost his garden to the weeds.  And soon, with no source of food, the old man, like his garden before him, wasted away and died.

Oh, That Bear!

Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.  That's an old Southern idiom that speaks truth to life.  Or put another way, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.  Who won and who lost in Alabama's razor-close squeaker senate race yesterday?  Time will tell.

Real man versus progressive twit

In the short term, the uni-party/Soros establishment machine - that is, the swamp - is the apparent winner, demonstrating that it can still crushingly apply the politics of personal destruction.  The accusations against Judge Moore were mostly proven as nothing more than political propaganda, aimed at keeping Southern women home.  It worked.  Had they turned out, a different headline would have greeted us today.  

Now the Democrats have gained another seat in the Senate, narrowing the GOP majority to 51-49, and putting at risk American constitutional ideals such as conservative judges appointed to the bench, limited immigration, and support of the Second Amendment, to name just a few.  McConnell must be gloating in his coffee this morning, having beaten Trump and Bannon - in his mind, at least - in the court of public opinion.   But the truth is that Doug Jones is a screaming liberal, and he won simply because he's not Roy Moore.

Moore was a flawed candidate for the established GOP.  He was way too Christian for the establishment - he had the Ten Commandments displayed in front of the courthouse.  Alabamians loved him for that; Washington DC was appalled.  He was too traditional in his Biblical beliefs - he wasn't supportive of so-called gay rights, feminism or of other progressive nonsense.  The very thought of him being elected to the senate terrified the swamp.  So the swamp managed to turn this election into a contest between men and women.  Rather, between men and feminists.  The pussy-hats won.  The bear eats you.  The campaign barely mentioned Alabamian concerns such as immigration, build the wall, and job creation.  Nope, it was all about he-ing and she-ing.  Say what you will about Judge Moore, a better choice for Alabama was certainly Morris Jackson "Mo" Brooks Jr.   But in this election, that ship had sailed.

The good news for conservatives is that they get a chance for a do-over in 2020.  Yesterday's special election was to fill the Senate seat vacated by Jeff Sessions when he was appointed US Attorney General.  So Jones' term can be short lived and temporary, if Alabamians so choose.  Alabama is a deep red state, and maybe they didn't like Judge Moore all that much, but contrary to leftist thinking and gloating, it ain't turning blue in 2020. 

So allow the swamp's gloating for now.   In two years, they'll be weeping again. The constitution is counting on it.

A Coke And A Smile: Lies And Damned Lies

One of the most engaging characteristics of the Donald is the way he can so brilliantly provoke the media.  Recently CNN was so absorbed with the false report that Trump drank twelve Diet Cokes a day, that they ran a day-long segment about what harm to one's physical and mental being can arise from drinking diet sodas.  Whew!  Good to know, CNN.  

Meanwhile, in the real world, another Muslim terrorist blew himself up - and his dick off - at the bus terminal in New York City.  So while Trump trolls the idiot talking heads in the MSM, they miss another real news story while trying to besmirch the President.  Funny thing, though.  The joke is on the MSM because real people in the real world aren't buying the propaganda any more.  Oh, and by the way, they're also fed up with it.  

Most recent dickless Muslim

Speaking of terrorists, Russian President Vlad Putin has withdrawn Russian troops from Syria, presumably because ISIS has been defeated there.  I'm not so sure about that.  Says who?  The MSM?  They lie to serve their own agenda; nothing they put out is unbiased "news."  The supposition that the enemy is defeated, and we can go home now is what the United States thought when the Kenyan withdrew US forces from Iraq.  How'd that work out?  But, you say, ISIS is so badly diminished they can't recover.  They're toast.  Don't kid yourself.  They always get back up and continue on.  Here's why.

What the Western governments either don't understand, or refuse to acknowledge is that unlike campaigns the US and its allies have waged in the last century against Italy, Japan, and Germany, in which unconditional surrender and total and complete cessation of hostilities was was the result, the fight with Islam isn't with a nation state that has an interest in self preservation.  Islam is still fighting the Crusades, and has been engaged in that conquest for the entirety of its existence.  Since Mohammad claimed to be the messenger of Allah fourteen hundred years ago, Islam has had but one goal.  And that is to die for Allah in eradicating or subjugating every human being in the world who isn't Muslim.  There's no political issue involved; there's no gain for their side, and there's no negotiated peace to be had.  Islam can't be simply defeated; it must be eradicated from the face of the Earth.  Harsh?  So be it. We're at war, folks, whether you want to believe it or not.  There are no moderate Muslims; there are only Islamists in any and all forms:  ISIS, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Quada, Boko Harem, Hamas, Palestine, and CAIR.  And, dear readers, their stated aim is to bring the fight to a to-the-death conclusion.  Its us or them.  I vote for us.

They're serious - we're not

So while CNN and other idiots debate the effects of diet soda, thinking they have manipulated public opinion of the president, as they continue to lie about Islam's intentions, the real news is that the enemy continues to attack, kill, maim, and engage in civilization jihad.  They are here, and when they have the numbers to vote themselves into positions of power (note London's troubles and its Muslim mayor), then the liberty-based country we know as the US will be gone, turned into a Sharia tyranny.  

So you can buy a gun and fight for America, or buy a goat and a camel.  Because the third world is where we're headed if we lose this fight.

The Same Sneak Attack

Days of infamy

Seventy-six years ago yesterday, the American naval base at Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Imperial Japanese Navy. The total number of American military personnel killed was 2,335, including 2,008 navy personnel, 109 marines, and 218 army soldiers. Added to this were 68 civilians, making the total fatalities at 2,403 dead. 1,177 were from the battleship USS Arizona alone. The number of wounded came to 1,143 with 710 navy, 69 marines, and 364 army personnel, as well as 103 civilians.  The very next day, Franklin D. Roosevelt committed the United States to a state of war with Japan.   Four years later, Japan surrendered to the US unconditionally, having been summarily beaten.

Just sixty years after Japan's infamous strike, radical Islamic Muslim Saudi fundamentalists attacked the United States, using hijacked US commercial air carriers as their platform.  The attacks were the most devastating foreign attack on American soil since the attack on Pearl Harbor.  During that attack on September 11, 2001, 2,996 people were killed (including 19 terrorists) and more than 6,000 others wounded. These immediate deaths included 265 on the four planes (including the terrorists), 2,606 in the World Trade Center and in the surrounding area, and 125 at the Pentagon. The very next day nothing happened, as our leaders wouldn't identify a nation state to blame.  Some time later the US invaded Iraq.  Yet over the next sixteen years, countless dollars, and thousands of lives, have been spent to make right those wrongs fostered upon us. And Islamic terror continues to this day unabated, our response castrated by political correctness.

What a profound difference in American resolve in the six decades between these two sneak attacks.  America responded in kind to the Japanese threat in 1941, yet today flounders about ineffectively, Vietnam-style, making the military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned us about ever richer, and our enemies ever more emboldened.  Consider the arrogance and existential threat from rogue states such as Iran and North Korea, for example.  Where now are those hard men, ready to do hard things?   Have we become a nation of pajama boys, with man-buns and cool tats, waiting for our wives and girlfriends to tell us what to think?

I hope not.  Maybe the return of the American male is at hand.  Maybe there will be an American adult - a leader - who will find a victorious end to the Crusades.  Maybe.