TPP: It Could Be Worse, And It Is

American voters got it right last week.  And one of the biggest bones of contention they have with the Kenyan's current style of governance is the dictatorial way he enacts laws.  I didn't say "passed" laws, because the president doesn't pass laws; he signs bills passed by congress, which then become law.  The Kenyan, of course, knows better than congress and the people it represents, so he's entitled to "fast track" legislation that bypasses congressional review and essentially becomes law.  That's how we got stuck with Obamacare.  He snookered congress into passing a bill they hadn't even read.  We all remember Nancy Pelosi's famous utterance, "we have to pass the bill to see what's in it."  Brilliant.  But none would question the motives of this president because, well, he's black and we don't want to be accused of being racist.  No matter what harm may befall the country and society, we just can't be called racists.  So we'll just sign off on whatever Marxist destruction he deems fit to impose upon us.

TPP Nations

Now we're presented with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement.  Like the Obamacare scam, TPP, which is not simply a “trade deal” but the creation of a new global governing structure, which weighs in at 5,554 pages and can only be reviewed in a secret, secured room in Washington, D.C. by congressmen and aides with certain security clearances. Under current fast-track rules, it cannot by amended or filibustered by Congress, according to Breitbart news.  Well, isn't that just swell.  I've heard of the notion of one man, one vote, but I'm not sure this is what was intended.

That said, the realities of political governance require a delicate touch.  Trump is brilliant in his selection of personnel for his team; he needs some outsiders to counter the status quo as promised in the campaign, but he also needs some guys in the inside as well. General Patton saw the need to leave mid level Nazis in place in Berlin in 1945, just to ensure the trains ran on time, after all.  Don't throw out the baby with the bath water, and all that.   Personally I don't trust Paul Ryan as far as I could throw him, but I'll wait and see if he's on board, or if he continues to act behind the scenes to sabotage the Trump agenda.  My last post warns against trusting the hidden hand, and I hope president-elect Trump will not let the globalists dissuade him from ending the ill advised erosion of national sovereignty.

Once bit, twice shy.  Obamacare is a destructive disaster.  It turns out to be even worse than we thought. So will be the TPP.  Voters know that what they don't know may rise up and bite them yet again.  And they are wary.  Very much so. So anytime a massive bill of any kind is brokered in back rooms and in secret red flags should go up.  If the people's business can't be conducted in the harsh light of day, it has no business being considered.  TPP should be rejected on its face, for just that reason.  Yet in the personage of House Ways and Means committee chair Kevin Brady another hidden hand reveals itself inside the GOP, as he urges the renegotiation of the TPP, rather than it's withdrawal.  Even the Kenyan's administration has admitted there is no way forward for this ludicrous surrender of sovereignty.  But big money donors to both parties are evidently still burning up the phone lines.

Again I say, trust no one, Mr. Trump.  And kill everything the Kenyan has done in the last eight years.  The voters are with you.

Beware The Hidden Hand

Note the expressions on their faces

There is nothing - in my experience - more vile, deceitful and duplicitous than a hardcore Alinsky-ite left wing democrat.  They will stop at nothing to enforce their perverted worldview on others.  That's more than just an opinion, by the way, as several studies have shown that folks of this persuasion have notably different brain activity patterns than do folks who tend to be constitutionalist conservative in their outlook. The former use less of their cognitive function, but more of their emotional response.  That in part is why it is hard for them to see reality;  they believe a thing even in the face of overwhelming contradictory evidence.  Like climate change is real and a threat.  Like Marxism works for the good of all.  Like big government tyranny is better than individual liberty.  Like guns are inherently bad.  And like Trump voters are ignorant, uneducated rubes.

So while the media - still licking its wounds and whimpering - covers the so-called transition of power meeting between the Kenyan and president-elect Donald Trump, it tries to present the Kenyan as conciliatory and respectful of the new president, emphasizing the Kenyan's vow to do everything possible to ensure a smooth transfer of leadership.  How noble.  How classy.  How disingenuous.

The problem with that sweet scenario is that, as we all know after the last eight years, the Kenyan falls neatly into the former category described above.  In his mind, it's a personal affront to him that DJT, the most imperfect and improbable presidential candidate in the first place, to have won the election so resoundingly.  Absent in his calculus is the fact that the American people rejected the Kenyan's worldview, culture and policies out of hand.  Completely.  Undeniably.

So while the Kenyan summons DJT to the white house to sit for the requisite photo ops, George Soros, his puppet master, is out there continuing to fund  riots, protests, vicious media articles, secession movements, all kinds of disruption and chaos, and yep, even calling for Trump's assassination.  Why?  Because hardcore Alinsky-ite left wing democrats never give up their fight to impose their perverted worldview on others.  Not ever.  And certainly not just because they lost an election.  It's not about the good of the people.  It's not about the will of the people.  It's not about jobs, or middle class security.   It's not about multiculturalism.  It's not about anything they say it's about.  It's only about them holding power over you.  Period.

So to Mr. Trump I say:  beware the hidden hand when one extends his hand to shake.  When the smile is broad, the eyes are dead, and the other hand is hidden, you're in the presence of a monster.  And that goes for those in either party and the media as well.

Beware the hidden hands.  Trust no one, Mr. Trump.

Defeat!

Wrong!  Why Americans Don't Trust the Media

Now that the balloons have dropped, and the fireworks display has been cancelled, it's time for the Democrats to pop a couple of Advil and knock back some strong coffee.  Nausea, sobbing and headaches will undoubtedly be the order of the day for the Media/DNC/Globalist elitists over the next few weeks.  And they have every right to be - er, uncomfortable - now that their stranglehold on political discourse has been irrevocably and  undeniably broken.  They thought they could continue to bully and demean real Americans by running the corrupt Hillary like they did that other corrupt Chicago community organizer.  They thought they could take on the American people - you know, we despicable rubes who live out here in flyover country - and they lost.  They lost big.  Whoa.  Didn't see that one coming.  

I'm trying to be as gracious as possible, but the cold hard facts are these:  There was an internal coup d'etat orchestrated and perpetrated by the Media/DNC/Globalist elites headed by the Kenyan/Clinton/Soros crime syndicate. That silent coup lasted eight long years.  Thanks in large part to Wkileaks and The Veritas Project, those crimes, schemes and sedition were uncovered and made public.  And the public, far from being too dumb to realize they were living under a corrupt and tyrannical dictatorship, rose up, found a leader and put down the coup.  Clinton's criminality, and by extension the Kenyan's perverted and hateful version of America, has been resoundingly rejected.  Let freedom ring.  Let corruption and treason be punished.  Let the terrorists be terrified.

Now the unfinished business of putting the country back together again after two terms of the Kenyan's divisiveness begins today.  The good guys won the Oval Office, and held onto majorities in the House and Senate.  The FBI can now throw off the oppressive and repressive edicts from Director James B. Comey and his fellow traitors in the Department of Justice, specifically Attorney General Loretta Lynch and assistant attorney general Peter J. Kadzik, and investigate the rampant criminality and treason that has permeated Washington DC for a decade.  That investigation will go all the way to the top, and the FBI knows it, the entrenched elites know it, and we the people know it.  The Clintonistas have good reason to fear.

For the rest of us, we can still see - through the fog - that shinning city on a hill once more. And as we cleanse ourselves of the filth of this eight-year-long nightmare, the world - along with us - breathes a sigh of relief.

America returns to greatness again.

Does Hillary Speak Arabic?

With the news now confirming Hillary's long time aide and confidante Huma Abedin is directly connected to Muslim groups who sponsor, condone or carry out terrorist activities, we see clearly that many of those so-called far right conspiracy theories were, well, actually true.  Huma is our gal Hill's right hand man, as it were, and is essentially tied at the hip to her.  She manages Hillary's campaign, her daily schedules, keeps her addled brain focused, and pretty much does everything else.  Now the discovery of another 650,000 emails, which were sent to or from Hillary's illegal private server and found on Anthony Wiener's computer, Huma's ex-husband of Carlos Danger infamy, add to the  deceit and intrigue  And by extension, emails that may have been either received, hacked or certainly read by hostile foreign governments.  Highly classified details of State Department traffic were open to anyone who can read the English language.  And Hillary and Huma are at the very center of the now re-opened FBI investigation.

But who is she, this exotic beauty with blood red lips and jet black hair?  In an uncharacteristically truthful article in January, Vanity Fair introduced Huma to us, and that damning information was subsequently covered up by Media Matters.  Both articles describe in detail just what her connections to Muslim organizations really are.  One can assume that Huma is fluent in Arabic, as she was an assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs between 1996 and 2008, a publication whose mission is “shedding light” on minority Muslim communities around the world in the hope of securing the legitimate rights of these communities.   What exactly are "legitimate rights"?  It turns out Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is an Abedin family business.  Well.  That's nice, having a foreign radical Muslim group mole embedded intimately inside the United States State Department.

We'll have to wait for the investigation to be concluded, of course, to be sure, but in watching these two for the last several years, one can freely speculate that their spying gig is finally up, and when the web of influence peddling and espionage come to light, that appropriate justice will be served.

I hope Hillary speaks Arabic.  She may very well need that skill in the near future.

Exonerated!

Sometimes you just have to shake your head at the irony and the insanity occurring in law enforcement in the United States today.  While a corrupt, seditious career criminal continues her campaign for the office of the president of the United States, the federal law enforcement apparatchiks gun down and arrest American ranchers for having the audacity to protest the heavy-handed antics of the Bureau of Land Management.  I wrote about the so called standoff here back in January, and the unfortunate and wholly unnecessary murder of Lavoy Finium, and the wounding of Ammon Bundy.  With his hands up, Finium was shot multiple times in the face and in the back. In front of his family.  By heavily armed BLM agents.

But last Thursday, all seven remaining defendants from the case that grew out of the 41-day standoff at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge were found not guilty by a jury in Portland, Oregon.  Not guilty.  Exonerated.  Hopefully, this verdict will open the door for civil liability cases to be brought by these American citizens against all-too-happy-to-kill federal agencies.  Unlawful death verdicts and awards are certainly warranted.

So the Feds see no problem killing ranchers who may allow their cattle graze on disputed BLM-controlled land, but the most corrupt public figure in American history is still walking free.  That's a pretty big bite to swallow.  But perhaps some sanity is seeping back into the American citizenry's psyche.  If a jury will free wrongly accused and harassed ranchers, perhaps law enforcement will finally indict the nation's most vile and corrupt politician for her crimes.  Recent developments can be seen as trending in that direction, as FBI Director James Comey reopens the Clinton email case, despite objections from the bought-and-paid-for Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

So in memory of Lavoy Finium, and in hopes that the greatest political and judicial system on earth has finally got its act together, and will throw off the corrupting politicization and weaponization that this vile administration has cast over it.

In that we can only hope.

The Demise of Consequence

Many parents today are dismayed by what they see their school age children bringing home as the result of their public education.   Further, they are astounded by the intellectual positions that their kids may have adopted due to the indoctrination in schools. (I'm speaking of genetics here, but further than that I will not go.  That's a topic for another post).  And those parents who may be inherently curious about what's being taught may be further astounded and, dare I say enraged, by what they may find just by doing a little research into what paradigms currently define the secondary scholastic education procedure. 

One such paradigm being used as a base for Common Core is Constructivism, and is defined as encouraging students to use active techniques (experiments, real-world problem solving) to create more knowledge and then to reflect on and talk about what they are doing and how their understanding is changing. The teacher makes sure she understands the students' preexisting conceptions, and guides the activity to address them and then build on them. That's their definition verbatim.  Is this a valid teaching methodology?  What will be the result of this method twenty, thirty years out?  The evidence so far would seem to conclusively point to the demise of individualism, and squarely to group think.

What happens when one denies the result of cause and effect in teaching methods?  What happens when a teacher removes the concept of consequence of actions from the teaching equation?  The answer is that students are free to discuss the relevancy their own preexisting experience and discuss others' notions, as well.  There's no wrong answer, but no right answer, either.  Peachy.  I'm warm and fuzzy all over just writing about it.

The problem with Constructivism is that it doesn't take into consideration the affect of causality.  It denies consequence.  Let's discuss why the tomato plant didn't bear fruit.  We'll fall back on our previous experiences we may have had when other plants died.  We'll formulate a consensus that plants that don't bear fruit are still alive.  We'll determine if - somewhere in the past - we've had an experience of barren fruit bearing plants.  Stroking our chins, we'll revel in the fact that we're being very scientific and learned in our views.  But we ignore the root rot the tomato plant has developed due to over watering, perhaps.  Or the grub that's gnawing away on the root structure that we inadvertently imported in the soil. But we studiously deny a consequence to an observed truth.

If the effort were to promote and nurture critical thinking in our children's developing minds, this system fails.  If the effort is to indoctrinate our kids into a non-individual group think, this system is a marvel.

Put another way, let's say we have a pet - a mature dog - who we love and adore.  We have him in the house at night, although he prefers it outside where he can excel as guard dog of the family estate.  And every night he urinates inside the house, on the wall, on a couch, on other select areas he's chosen.  Every night he does this, even though he's given the opportunity to go outside to pee before being brought into the house.  What do we do?  Do we merely contemplate his motivation?  Do we accept it as an inevitable result of pet ownership?  Or do we take action to apply a consequence to an unwanted action?  What if in this scenario the dog were a 10-year old child who had no control over her continence?  Would we allow that behavior, or would we merely arrive at a communal consensus that, well, she doesn't really mean to do it, so we'll look the other way?  And we hope she doesn't pee herself in public and embarrass the family name.  But insanely, in either case, we withhold the application of consequence to that action or behavior.

So the educational system now in use has determined that, in its drive to withhold judgement of right or wrong, of good or bad, that a mutually arrived at group consensus is a superior method of problem solving than the traditional direct observation.  Of cause and effect.  Of consequence of action.  And what is the result? We get corrupt and evil politicians like Hillary Clinton, who with the well known revelations of her corruption, sedition and insanity, avoid the consequences of actions and literally get away with murder.  And we get an entire generation of intellectual snowflakes who can't think critically, and who seek refuge in "safe spaces" lest their tender sensibilities be assaulted.

And we get dogs that still pee in the house.