Asking The Obvious

I was taught in school that the science of journalism required the asking of the questions of who, what, when, where and why of any incident or story.  Add the question "how" to that list.

Let's apply that to the Uvalde shooting story.  We know the who of the story; one Salvador Ramos.  The what, when and where are also known:  School shooting, May 24th, Uvalde, Texas.

Determining the why is a little more difficult.  Early indications are that Ramos was and is a mentally disturbed, alienated, self mutilating loner.  Bullied and ridiculed, the narrative goes, he extracted his revenge upon the societal construct that rejected him.  Every teenager is ridiculed and bullied, but they don't shoot little kids.

But the details lie in the how.  How does a marginally employed 18 year old acquire the necessary funds to purchase two Daniel Defense M4 carbines?  These are very nice rifles, and retail at $2,057 each. Let's add some required optics (sights) to at least one of those rifles as well.  Probably $950 or more each.  Oh, yeah, and we'll need extra magazines, and a boatload of .223 ammo.  Call it another $500 or so.  It appears he ran up at least a $5,500 shopping spree.  Five grand?  At 18 years old?  Works at Wendy's?  With no dad, no mom? Interesting, isn't it?

But that doesn't pass the smell test. Could it be that maybe - just maybe - the FBI or some other nefarious government alphabet agency had a hand in this?  You know, like they most likely did in the Parkland, Douglas and Sandy Hook school shootings, as well as J6, the Whitmer "kidnapping", the Sacramento DNC HQ bombing attempt, the Trump-Russia hoax and in numerous other false flags.

It's not only plausible but probable given the direction federal law enforcement has gotten from the Biden-Kenyan's Third Term administration. 

But let's dig even deeper into the who of this incident.  Where is Ramos from?  Where was he born?  How about a birth certificate?  Who - and where - are his birth parents?  Is he just an alienated psycho teenager?  Was he treated for emotional problems, psychosis or other mental disorders?  If so, what drugs was he taking, and who was his attending physician? Is he an illegal alien, or a government plant - the patsy - or both?

If we had real unafraid journalists in the media instead of regurgitative democrat sycophants harping the official narrative, perhaps we would have the answers to these obvious questions.

But we don't.