Transhumanism Through Depopulation

The criminally insane who hold governance over us have gone quite off the rails. In a span of a few short months since the Kenyan's stolen and illegal third term featuring the hapless Joe Biden, these mentally ill deviates have enacted more chaos, insanity and satanic practices upon the world's population than at anytime in recent history.

One could argue that - given that they are true believers in such nonsense as global warming, a feudal new world order and the ascension of artificial intelligence - these polices may seem to be in line with their agenda and their beliefs. That is, if one took things at face value, which when dealing with the left, one can't, all this craziness and destruction may seem logical.

But it doesn't, and it isn't.

Because behind these contrived crises of crashing housing and financial markets, weaponization of government agencies, soaring inflation and the demise of dollar based currency, imposed scarcity of food and available energy, insane denial of biological sexes, glorification of prepubescent genital mutilation, and the tyrannical suppression of free speech, we find they have a singular goal: 

Transhumanism through global depopulation, whereby Man becomes God.

 

The idea is to make people define themselves as merely a stack of meat driven by internal neurological impulses, really no different than a binary algorithm.  And in doing so, create the idea than man is just an advanced AI entity - with no soul, no connection to anything greater than ourselves; just meat.

If that's what we are, and we can readily replace the disobedient man - whose very existence threatens the planet's health - with a clean, Earth friendly AI entity, well then, why not do that?  Then there's so much more beautiful Earth for us clear thinkers and elites to enjoy!  And who needs the peasant class?  We don't need an underclass; we can program AI robots to mop the floors and take out the garbage.

But what of disposal?  Six or eight billion dead folks will create more climate damage exponentially than all the known cow farts.  Let that sink in.  Right on cue, and following in the footsteps of Washington state, California has now legalized human composting.  Brilliant!  Decomposing humans can atone for their sin of existence by helping with the re-nourishment of the planet.  Our tomatoes - tended to by our AI robots of course - will be bigger, sweeter and redder than ever!

In light of this satanic plan for mankind, now obvious to all who have eyes to see, the GOP comes up with a lame "Commitment To America" that addresses none of these issues any deeper than at a superficial level.  Mere lip service.  While that may be a start - albeit a feeble one - it's something.   It'll get a few votes at least.

But the time for politics is long past.  This is an existential war on humanity itself, and we the people of this blue orb had better start believing Yuval Noah Harari, historian, futurist, eugenicist and World Economic Forum (WEF) adviser, when he says,

"We just don't need the vast majority of the population in today's world."

That's chilling, because he's serious, and far from being a wild eyed fanatic, he's taken seriously by the depopulationist bad guys.  They have declared war on us, and we just sit there, bland and complacent and smile and nod.  But we best be beating our plowshares onto swords, because this is no drill, and our survival is at stake.

Let's consider Frederick Nietzsche's observation in 1884 in his seminal work Thus Spake Zarathustra about the perils of "progressive-ism" and see if anything seems relevant:

"God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?"

God is dead for those in power.  They care not at all for the rest of us.  Transhumanism is on the horizon, and we as a species are not.

Things Are Getting Out Of Hand

Students of history will recall the nature of the founding of this great Republic in which we live, and will see with absolute clarity what needs to be done at this point in time, as things have most assuredly gotten out of hand.

The Declaration of Independence begins thus:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with one another, and to assume among the Powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect of the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

With these words, thirteen of the British colonies in North America unanimously declared independence from British rule. The rest of that Declaration itemized some two dozen or more specific grievances the American colonies had with England's King Charles.  Oddly enough, most of those grievances are still applicable in today's issues with the federal government. Kings are kings, even if they are illegitimate presidents.

Eighty-five years after that famous Declaration, and adhering to principles articulated by their revolutionary forebears, the 11 Confederate States of America seceded from the United States, plunging the country into the bloodiest war of its history.  Historians today attempt to explain the origins of the War of Northern Aggression by relying heavily on a constructed narrative mythology - that the South left the Union in order to maintain slavery, while President Lincoln's goal was to preserve the nation. Nonsense.  Honest historians challenge this traditional position. Delving deeply into both foreign and domestic observers, a powerful and convincing case may be made that the Southern states were legitimately exercising their political rights as expressed in the Declaration of Independence - and as  guaranteed in the Constitution. Although conventional histories have taught generations of Americans that this was a war fought for lofty moral principles, it has been historically demonstrated that the War of Northern Aggression was primarily a battle over competing commercial interests, and of opposing interpretations of constitutional rights.  Read that as specifically states' rights.

Yet now 158 years after that bitter conflict, and 244 years after Independence, we have exactly the same set of circumstances that triggered both of those wars. Unlike the first, waged against England, and unlike the second, waged against a puritanical tyranny emanating from the New England states, this upcoming conflict will be less of a state-versus-state engagement; rather it will be between competing political philosophies:  Woke globalism versus America first nationalism.  And as such, there's really no identifiable territory to define these sides, as we're all dispersed throughout the land. Any martial conflict will be confused, raw and bloody, as identifying the "enemy" will nigh on be impossible.

But it's clear that things have certainly gotten out of hand lately: the deep state, now identified as the DOJ, FBI, HHS, White House, and the mainstream media have pulled out all the stops to enact their globalist, trans-humanist agenda. Consider just some of these current events: 

• The border is wide open and millions of non-English speaking threats have invaded;
• The economy is in decline with double-digit inflation; 
•  Critical Race Theory demonizes the Caucasian (White) Race, and is being taught in public schools; 
  
• Crime in democrat run cities is open and in your face wherein black thugs are given carte blanche to pillage and plunder at will; 
• The military is more concerned with appeasing the sexually and mentally disturbed than being prepared to fight foreign and domestic threats; 
• We send trillions of dollars in "aid" to a corrupt country so that the well connected political elite may continue their illegal money laundering schemes, all the while middle class Americans suffer here at home;
  
• China, Russian, Iran and North Korea have threatened the US with nuclear war; 
• The DOJ has empowered the FBI to function as the nation's gestapo, and have unconstitutionally raided, detained and harassed dozens of innocent US citizens who vote conservative; 
• Capitol trespasser citizens have been imprisoned without due process for over a year;
• Conservative and Christian voices have been stifled through social media censorship;
• Our children are being sexualized in kindergarten and forced to accept "drag queens" and other perversions as normal;
• We have been subjected to a death sentence via a vile gene toxin mandated by the fake Covid scamdemic;
  
• And we have the trans-humanist cabal of CDC, WEF, Bill Gates and others deciding who will live and who will die at the hands of their imposed food scarcities.

So it may be prudent to ask how have things gotten so far out of hand, and even more prudent to ask what should be done about it.  It's been proven that the current administration gained office through fraud, deceit and avarice, and it has since enacted policies that are antithetical to traditional American values.  But nevertheless, this administration, along with its fellow travelers in the global cabal, seek the destruction of the greatest human self governance experiment in history.  Perhaps it is time to blow the dust off those sacred documents, to re-read them in the context of today's political landscape, and consider that it is time - perhaps it's well past time - to do as the founders had done, at the risk of their fortunes and sacred honor:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with one another, and to assume among the Powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect of the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Let's remember Thomas Paine:  It's time to throw off the yoke once and for all.

Competence, Or Tolerance and Inclusion?

When can we start telling the truth?  As a staunch advocate of the First Amendment, and of free speech in general, I have some observations concerning the headlines of late:

Carnegie Mellon University professor Uju Anya reacted to the news of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II suffering from poor health shortly before her death on Thursday by calling her a “wretched woman” and a “genocidal colonizer” who is “the chief monarch of a thieving raping genocidal empire,” adding, “May her pain be excruciating.”

That's very tolerant, inclusive, sophisticated and subtle, Uju.  Who are you, again?  Let's find out.  Here's her bio from her own lavishly done website:

Dr. Uju Anya teaches and conducts research in the Modern Languages Department at Carnegie Mellon University as associate professor of second language acquisition. Her primary fields of inquiry are critical applied linguistics, critical sociolinguistics, and critical discourse studies examining race, gender, sexual, and social class identities in new language learning through the experiences of African American students. She has expertise in diversity, equity, and inclusion in instructional practices and curriculum design, applied linguistics as a practice of social justice, intercultural communication, as well as service-learning and civic engagement in secondary and university-level language programs.

Wow.  Woke much?  In connection with her comments and her worldview, let's delve into some inconvenient historical truths.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain  explored the globe, bringing enlightenment and civilization to under developed areas of the world, especially in India, Africa and the South Pacific.  Had the ancestors of that “genocidal colonizer” who is “the chief monarch of a thieving raping genocidal empire,” not colonized Africa, and essentially elevated its civilization by a millennia or two, this pseudo intellectual with the cush job at an ivy league university would still be fetching water from the muddy creek, chasing game, and living in a thatched hut along with the rest of her tribe.  If this fool is truly a student of "critical applied linguistics, critical sociolinguistics, and critical discourse studies" as she claims to be, she would know that, but for British and western European influence, her tribe's social and cultural advancement, evolution and enlightenment was unlikely given its unwritten language and stone age culture.  But no matter.  She obviously hates herself, and is willing to demonstrate that hate to the entire world by damning a woman she's never met simply because - yes, I'm going there - western white culture pulled her and her ancestors out of stone age ignorance.  Further, another western European inspired country, the United States, gave her an opportunity to elevate herself from ignorance and backwardness. And now, a century or two later, she benefits from that "colonization" by having an English speaking cush American university professorship teaching what she calls "languaging blackness."  Racist people like her continue to bite the hand that feeds. 

Or how about this:

Democrats are “increasingly pessimistic” about Stacey Abrams’ prospects of unseating Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R), according to a report from the left-leaning New York Times.

Oops.  Could it be that the requirement of competent merit in our local, state and national leaders is returning?  That we the people are now aware that we must elect leaders who have the will, ability and competence to lead, rather than electing those who fit into an arbitrary social group?  Or is it that we the people are tired of the divisive aspect of voting for candidates who run on simply being of a defined identity?  One hopes the trend continues, and we can finally get intelligent and competent adults back in charge.

  

As for Stacy, she's all about being "black" and a "woman." And yes, she did serve in the Georgia House of Representatives from 2007 to 2017, but her campaign for governor of Georgia is limping along.  Why?  Are the fine folks in Georgia - both women and blacks included - sick and tired of candidates whining  about their identity, and not so much about the real issues challenging folks every day?  Or maybe it's the fact that this loud and obnoxious feminist racist is not even a native Georgian; she was born in Wisconsin.  Being a Yankee carpetbagger doesn't sit well with a lot of Georgians. Nonetheless, she'll lose this gubernatorial election - again - because she offers voters nothing more than herself as a black woman.  And that no longer will cut it.

Far from picking on just these two Democrat women to make my point about the need for competence - as I define it as merit - I'm not.  There are countless other examples of this glaring contrast between competence and identity in both parties, in positions of power both elected and appointed.  Even in my home state of Florida, a Democrat is challenging Florida native Governor Ron DeSantis for that office.  Charlie Crist, like Stacy Abrams, is another looser who loves to concede elections, and as he's from Pennsylvania originally, the term carpetbagger applies to him as well.

The silver lining in all of this is the woke idea of absolute tolerance and inclusion, but only for the left, is dying upon the altar of competence.  Merit and competence are putting to shame the lunacy of identity politics.

And it's about time.

Awake, Not Woke

Two words keep coming to mind as I read all the fake news, propaganda, wishful thinking, and out right lies that comprise the so-called media today.

Merit.

Discrimination.

Of course, these two words are penitus prohibitum -  utterly forbidden - in any civil discourse these days, because they represent a philosophy that is antithetical to the Deep State/New World Order narrative. And that philosophy can be described as the quest for the personal attainment of worth, and the free application of choice.  But let's find out why the woke left despises these words, and why we should use them in word and deed more often.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, which in my view is the definitive source for the proper use and etymology of the English language, defines them as follows.

Merit is defined in use 1 as: "that which is deserved or has been earned, whether good or evil; due reward or punishment."

Discrimination is defined in use 1 as: "the action of discriminating; the perceiving, noting, or making a distinction or difference between things; a distinction (made with the mind or in action)."

Regarding merit, we can see how it aligns with the biblical idiom "you reap what you sow." Interestingly, and as a testament to its epistemological truth, the Hindu concept of karma - which describes a system in which beneficial effects are derived from past beneficial actions and harmful effects from past harmful actions - support this.  Two concepts from two vastly different ancient religions a world apart seem to validate merit as an inescapable human consequence of one's actions - whether good or ill.

But what do we see happening in government, in school boards, in woke corporate boards of directors, and in other centralized institutions of power?  We see the exact opposite of merit.  Folks are empowered by their sex, by their illusions of their gender, by their skin color, by their political leanings or by their status of victimhood.  But not on their necessary competence.  And as a people being governed by these frauds, what benefit do we reap from that?  What does this lack of meritocracy yield in the long run?  Do we advance our species, building on the backs of the giants who came before?  Are our kids being educated beyond the levels of which we ourselves were educated? Do they really know more than we do?  Or because of our turning our backs on the benefits of merit do we degrade ourselves to the point of reversing civilization, dumbing it down, and eventually erasing it all together? Which definition of merit do we seek?

Well, how about discrimination?  With the new normal demanding that we see no differences in each other - inclusion I think is the term being used - we refuse to note the obvious. And yet inclusion itself requires discrimination.  If, as Affirmative Action requires, we see a candidate for a job has black skin, we are required to hire him.  But we do so at the cost of a white, or red, or brown, or yellow skinned individual. Isn't  noting a difference in things the very definition of discrimination?  Why, yes.  Yes, it is.  If we see an effeminate male, adorned in garish makeup and clothed in women's attire, we're told we must acquiesce to his preferred identity of who he thinks he is, even when it is obvious he is anything but.  We must stomp down our obvious noting a difference between him and a manly man, and play his mentally ill game.   Or let's say you're walking down a city street.  On one side is a group of older gentlemen in shirt sleeves playing checkers on the sidewalk.  On the other side is a group of youths wearing hoodies, all of whom are looking right at you.  What are your instincts telling you?  Inclusion?

 

Merit and discrimination are inbred survival instincts common to all animals. One discriminates against danger.  One makes a discriminate choice to avoid obvious dangers, and one lives.   One learns from these correct choices - and from those incorrect choices, as well -  and one earns the right through merit to advance himself and his progeny.  In doing so, the world goes on.  If we as a culture, or especially as a species, disregard this truth and act in contravention to it, the future will not only be bleak, it will be nonexistent. 

Resist the urge to succumb to political peer pressure.  Wokeism is a combination of narcissistic arrogance and complete incompetence, as Victor Davis Hanson reminds us.  Speak and act as a human being.   Ignore the woke insanity around you, because there is another undeniable truth:  

This too shall pass.

Backfire!

Where is Lewis Carroll now that we need him to translate for us the insanity of the world in which we live?  We are all Alice nowadays, as we trippingly traipse through this surreal wonderland.  What could be more fun?

The maniacal left, along with their insane fellow travelers, are pulling out all the stops to enact their socialist, tyrannical agenda on the peoples of the world.  The jackboots have arrived, are in place, and are ready, willing and able to kick some extremist ass and take names as we speak.  

Let's review.

Never in American history has a former President of the United States been subjected to a government raid upon his personal residence.  Out of forty-six men to have held that honorable office, only three have ever even been impeached: Andrew Johnson in 1868, Bill Clinton in 1998 and Donald Trump in 2019.  In fact, past presidents historically have been afforded an element of respect, civility and privilege that is appropriate with the office.  But in 2022, an FBI raid on Trump's residence, purely for political reasons, actually happened. The Deep State's goal is to paint Trump as a common criminal, and by such make him unpalatable to voters and the MAGA crowd.  It's also designed to destroy the man completely, and to dissuade any other political outsiders from ever seeking public office, especially with the expressed purpose to "drain the swamp."

But their plan backfired.  Trump's appeal soared, as Americans always love their underdog.

How about the now infamous "Dark Brandon" speech recently?  Apparently the White House advisors thought it would appeal to voters to portray Sleepy Joe as the fiery, take charge leader Dark Brandon in his passionate "unity" speech.  Maybe a backdrop reminiscent of 1940s Hitler and Mussolini speeches would sway voters.  Maybe castigating one-half the nation's population as haters and extremists would convince brain dead voters to rally 'round the flag, boys.  Maybe advising patriots that going against the government would require the use of  F-15s, not AR-15s.  Maybe inciting civil war.

But it backfired.  We won't take the bait.  Even CNN, no friend of conservatives even today, questioned the imagery of Marines and ominous red and blue background lighting effect. It was bizarre to say the least.

And the jabs.  Let us not overlook the most sinister mandate ever to curse the world - mandated human gene manipulation.  If life imitates art, and apparently it does, this scenario has been foretold many times, not the least of which was in the popular television series, The X-Files.  Scientists have been able to edit the genome, go to a specified spot in virtually any genome, cut the DNA, and then coax the DNA molecule to incorporate a custom-made genetic sequence as it heals itself. It can used to not only delete a gene, but to add a gene.  That essentially kills your immune system, as it attempts to attack itself.  In the series, of course, it was aliens as the bad guys doing this.  In real life, it's the government and its collusion with Big Pharm that's depopulating the world through not only immediate death, but to sterilization. 

But it backfired. Well, not entirely, unfortunately, but it was not as universally accepted as the Deep State had hoped.

A survey from The Economist/YouGov Poll asked respondents to indicate which statement describes them best. While a majority, 71 percent, indicated that they have received “at least one shot of ANY manufacturers COVID-19 vaccine,” three in ten, 29 percent, said they have not. The figure is highest among independents, 39 percent of whom said they have not received any coronavirus vaccine. Another 35 percent of Republicans indicated that they have not received a vaccine either, and 14 percent of Democrats said the same.  An irony here is that the very folks who took the jab(s) willingly upon advice and direction from our own government - the majority of democrats for instance - are the most likely to suffer the consequence of their decision in both long and short term timelines.  That is to say, they are the most likely to be culled from the Homo Sapiens herd. Sweet irony, is it not?

So while we see never ending attacks on our politics, our belief systems, our freedoms, and our very persons emanating from this government, we see also the silver lining in all this Alice-in-Wonderland chaos.

And that is that it is all backfiring. Pass the popcorn.

Useless People

According to Yuval Noah Harari, historian, futurist, eugenicist and World Economic Forum (WEF) adviser,

We just don’t need the vast majority of the population in today's world.  I think the biggest question in maybe in economics and politics of the coming decades will be what to do with all these useless people?  The problem is more boredom and what to do with them and how will they find some sense of meaning in life, when they are basically meaningless, worthless? My best guess, at present is a combination of drugs and computer games as a solution for [most]. It’s already happening.  I think once you’re superfluous, you don’t have power.

Harari identifies a trans-humanist vision of the future in which brain-computer interfaces make our grounding in the material world obsolete, human relationships become meaningless due to artificial substitutes, and the poor die but the rich don’t.

 

Well now. 

That certainly explains the current political and cultural chaotic nonsense with which we have had to contend.  It would seem that the self identified mega-brains of the world - Klaus Schwab, the despicable Kenyan, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bill Gates, to name a few - have now decided that humans are just hackable animals, and can be controlled through an application of Big Tech and AI.  Their trans-humanist consensus is based on the fact that AI can indeed outperform humans in certain tasks, playing Chess or Go, for instance. The reason for that is AI can compute multiple moves and strategies far faster and deeper than even champion players when the game is bounded by rules.  The Trans-humanists' contention is that artificial intelligence is simply so much better than the human intelligence that created it. Clearly, the prospect of Human-AI-Hybid individuals becoming "gods" while the rest of humanity sinks into uselessness and meaninglessness.  And this notion excites these people. So the elite get a brain chip implanted, and we, the useless of the world do not.  Then of course, are thus relegated to be disposed of.

But just how probable is this?

Not very.

Other deep thinkers scoff at Harari's insatiable ego and hubris by noting that AI isn't very well adapted to creative thinking.  So while some mundane jobs may indeed fall to AI, or H+ (self titled "Trans-humanism"), spacial reasoning will - at least for now - remain in the domain of natural humans. In fields such as medicine, law, counseling, creative thinking and writing, accounting - and even such things as interior design or hair styling - AI automation is neither possible nor plausible.  So how many "useless people" will there truly be?

But there’s another side to all this, and is probably a more important and dangerous one: Harari considers free will a “dangerous” myth, a point with which neurosurgeon Michael Egnor has taken issue. Egnor argues convincingly that it is the denial of free will that is a cornerstone of totalitarianism: “Without free will, we are livestock, without the presumption of innocence, without actual innocence, and without rights.”

Obviously.  

So while the deep thinkers at the Davos  and TED clubs get all giddy about their rise to godlike overlords over the rest of us plebs, it’s clear that given Harari's intense, dramatic focus on “useless,” “meaningless,” and “worthless” people, that he is advocating complete totalitarianism completely.  Eugenics, which is antithetical to God himself, just never seems to become dépassé. 

And therein lies the evil.