Fat Ugly Chicks Win One

What happens when natural biology is weaponized . . .

If ever there was a compelling arugument for tort reform, the recent and ongoing drama at Fox News would come up as Exhibit A.  And the genesis for that drama is the illogical and insane adherence to political correct feminist dogma.  

Here's the rub.  Television, and especially cable TV, is a visual medium, and producers have come a long way in market savvy since news anchors were exclusively old white men.  Think Dan Rather, Walter Cronkite, Chet Huntley.  TV back then was in black and white, so all that was needed was a talking head.  With great hair.

Today we have high definition, mega-pixels television in vivid color, and news management knows its customer base wants to see pretty.  And cable delivers on pretty.  Does it ever.  So nowadays we get babes.  Hot babes.  Beautiful, voluptuous, buxom hotties with great legs.  And yes, we viewers get to see legs. Sculpted, shapely and long legs.  Remember Megyn Kelly's glass desktop?  Yeah, me, too.  Bear with me here, I'm not going soft core on you. There's a point to this.

In light of modern news technology, we now have a plethora of hot babes reading the evening news to us.  In vivid and high def color.  Consequently, downstairs at human resources, female job applicants get the unmistakable message that fat, ugly chicks need not apply.  Not for on-air talent positions, anyway.  It's simply a fact of life.

So then let's say we have a universe of hot babes wandering around the offices and studios, interacting with male counterparts in all departments.  And as males will, they notice that there's a sea of very attractive ladies milling about.  The copy boy, who has all of $17 in his checking account, may greet one of the hotties and admiringly say, "If I told you had a fabulous body, would you hold it against me?"  What do you think would happen? He'd get the extended middle finger, or a curt but to-the-point castrating rebuff, and that would be the end of it.  Yet let a famous man who is also a news anchor, and who earns $20 million a year, leer or possibly lick his lips or engage in some other demonstration of appreciation of a particular woman's appearance, what do you think would happen in that case?  Right.  Lawsuit.  And that severe legal assault on a completely innocent and normal biological reaction is wrong on so many levels.  And we have the fat, ugly feminists to thank for it. 

Here's the natural biology of men and women.  Normal women want to be attractive to men.  Normal men want women to be attractive.  But the fat, ugly feminists want everyone to suffer as they believe they have suffered.  They believe they've been left out of the accessibility pool of desirable females.  They probably have been, but for reasons other than lack of physical attractiveness.  No matter, they want to wreck the natural biological process.  End attractiveness.  End male response to attractiveness.  So to that end, to court we will go.

The definition of "tort" for the purposes of this discussion is a civil wrong or wrongful act, whether intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another.  Now in the context of torts, an "injury" describes the invasion of a legal right, as opposed to "harm," which describes a loss or detriment in fact that an individual suffers.  But what right is assailed?  What injury is sustained?

What this means is that feminists have essentially weaponized the natural act of a man noticing a woman and commenting on it.  It's unlikely that any real sexual assault occurred, like the guy grabbing her in the hall and having his way with her.  Nope, this is simply verbal commentary - no touching - we're talking about.  But insurance companies and defendants' attorney teams don't want to go to court and fight, citing court battle costs may exceed any settlement awards.  So they settle.  Worse, if the accused does settle the case, he is still guilty - not because he did it - but because, being male, he simply could have.  Think about that.  Legalized extortion is still alive and well.  Just like the scams the racist shakedown clowns Sharpton and Jackson still try to pull off.

What is the inevitable outcome of the fat and ugly harpy feminists winning this battle in the so called war of the sexes?  For one, sleazy attorneys like Gloria Allred and her ilk getting rich beyond their courtroom abilities.  For another, it sets a troubling cultural precedent.  And it only punishes men.  Women still show lots of skin, cleavage and leg to attract a man's interest.  But men are not supposed to notice, let alone comment.  But far beyond that, we're seeing a cultural reaction backlash to this feminist bullying.  Ever heard of MGTOW?  Follow that link.  A seismic shift in male-female relationships is under way, and it ain't good.

And for this unnatural extortion we can thank the fat and ugly harpies who brought us modern feminism.

Civility's Post Mortem

Another psychopathic Negro murders an innocent, random victim, and unrepentantly posts it streaming live on Facebook.  Then politely saves the taxpayer from having to prosecute him.  All across the country, teens kill themselves streaming live on Facebook, eager for that one brief moment of fleeting fame.  And society cannot look away.  In Berkeley, Antifa forms another violent mob, beating people up merely because they hold a different political viewpoint.  Lost on this mob is the irony that they shout anti-fascist slogans while simultaneously enacting fascist activities, all the while pretending to honor free speech.  In New York, vicious Hispanic gangs rape and kill with abandon, and law enforcement holds back, so as not to offend a protected group.  Mexican drug cartels gun down entire families in their sleep,and no one intervenes for fear of reprisals.  Law enforcement quakes in fear, as these cartels kill lawmen on both sides of the border.  And in Washington the deep state continues its sedition with its unbridled sabotage of the duly elected Trump Administration, determined to keep the divisiveness prevalent during the Kenyan's reign alive and well.

On college campuses all over the United States, the extreme left progressive movement continues to turn high-tuition-paying students into brainwashed fanatics.  The liberal-lesbian Wellesley College student newspaper calls for retaliation against students who refuse to wear the brown shirt of progressivism.  And at Arizona State, a female Hispanic professor of Global Politics of Human Rights gave her class the option of protesting President Trump or taking a final exam.  The irony seems to lost on these useful idiots, as well.

The progressive social Marxist narrative is that white men are to blame for all our woes.  Ironic.  The founders of this nation, white men all, realized that a constitutional republic is contingent upon an educated and informed public.  And for two hundred-plus years America has been the bastion of freedom of the world, saving countless millions from tyranny and enslavement.  But imperative to progressives is the dumbing down of the electorate so that it may be easily controlled, and by extension, told what to think.  Censorship replaces free speech.  Political correctness replaces common sense. Violence replaces dialogue.  Intentions replace actions.  As we fear, day by day, that Orwell was right, as we watch the language and meaning of words change before our eyes, as we watch illiterate, uneducated, diseased and unskilled sub-humans flood our lands, as we arm ourselves in anticipation of the inevitable conflict to come, are we actually witnessing the demise of Western civilization?  One hopes not.

But for a society who cannot look away from the constant morbidity to which we're exposed, it would seem that civility is quite dead.

UPDATE 19 April 2017:
The day after this post was published, yet another radicalized Negro Islamist killed three people.  And, as if to prove my point above, this senseless violence occurred in liberal, gun-free Fresno, California. You know, where only criminals can have guns.  After assuring its citizens to fear not, that that Muslim "lone wolf" terror was overblown, the Fresno Bee (and the New York Times, as well) had egg - er, blood - on their faces as 39 year old Kori Ali Muhammad randomly sought out and killed three white people, shooting them point blank.  Thanks should be given to the Kenyan and his eight-year reign of racial divisiveness, and to his puppet master George Soros for instilling this kind of violent hatred among the more intellectually malleable among us.  Racial violence isn't by whites on blacks; it's quite the other way around.  And it's no wonder folks want to be armed.  And at all times.

Hijacked? Or Masterfully Planned?

Well, then.  In reviewing current events, it almost seems as if the recent election was for naught, doesn't it?   Of course, it was unrealistic to believe that all that was promised would be immediately delivered, but one has to wonder about the deviation of the expected course of the ship of state.  Consider:

Too liberal, too young to govern covertly

Has the Trump administration been hijacked by the neocons?  Was a strike against Assad an emotional knee jerk response to Ivanka and Jared's whining about gassed dead babies?  Or was it a masterful play in shaking up the dozen or so players - including and possibly especially Russia and Iran - involved in the Syrian civil war quagmire?  The message is clearly Trump ain't Obama.  From the conservative point of view much has been said about the Kushners' neocon influence on the president, possibly leading him astray from his nationalistic and populist tendencies that were the promises of his campaign.  You know, Monroe Doctrine, America first?  There might be merit to that assertion.  The Semites - that includes Jews and Arabs - are now and have always been a tribal people, and to expect them to embrace and participate in a western style democracy is folly.  Let's not forget what happened in the Middle East after the US toppled other corrupt - but stabilizing - dictatorships in the region.  Those despots may be bad guys, but at least the region was relatively stable; there was no ISIS and Iran didn't have nuclear capability.   There was no threat from radical Islam; it was kept under very tight control.  If anyone is to be militarily targeted, let it be Al Qaeda and ISIS.  Assad is merely a big fish in a small pond and is doing more good than bad being left where he is.

US power projected into North Pacific

And speaking of rattling sabers, Kim Jong Un of North Korea seems intent on getting himself whacked.  His habit of launching ballistic missiles at whales in the Sea of Japan has prompted Trump to send the Carl Vinson Strike Group of the US Navy's Third Fleet his way in an obvious show of American force. Then he sits down for a little dinner with China's Xi.  Get that little guy under control, is the message, or we'll do it ourselves.  Bold.  In response, a pissed-off Putin goes back into Nicaragua.       

Trump voters are still scratching their heads about the ill fated health care bill that - thankfully - failed last month.  Repeal was the campaign promise, so just repeal the onerous ObamaCare bill.  Let market forces provide demand driven services and determine pricing.    Mo Brooks, Alabama Republican member of the house, filed a bill to do just that two weeks ago.  Here it is in its entirety:  "Effective as of Dec. 31, 2017, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted,"   It's crisp, to the point and succinct.  The House Republicans should take that and run with it.  It appeals to the voters, but not to the establishment, who are cashing donor checks from the insurance lobby.  Meanwhile, the liberal press is already trying to hang the ObamaCare albatross around the GOP's neck.

Someone has to answer for Benghazi

What else?  Tax cuts?  Maybe later.  Border wall?  We're working on that.  Stop the Muslim invasion?  We're implementing extreme vetting.  Delete the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency?  It's in the works.  Drain the Swamp?  There's still a lot of Obama holdovers left in DC to weed out.  What about prosecutions?  Hillary, Obama and Rice aren't out of the woods on their corruption and crimes, and Americans want to see some justice applied in the "too-big-to-jail" nonsense.  And rightfully so.  Lerner and Comey take note. 

OK, I know that's a lot to accomplish in the administration's first 100 days.  At least we got a constitutionalist on the Supreme Court.  I hope just hope Neil Gorsuch doesn't turn like the once pure John Roberts did.  And within the next four years possibly Kennedy and Ginsberg will retire, in one way or another, and the chance to appoint two more constitutionalist jurists may present itself.  One can hope.

So Trump is either a bull in a china shop, or is one of the most masterful non-politician politicians the world has seen since Machiavelli.  Or possibly both.  But the voters, I suspect, had kind of a notion of what to expect of Trump when they elected him.  After all, he was elected to shake things up - disrupt the status quo - and he is assuredly successful in that task.  So far.