Conservatism And The GOP

What if conservatives retake the Republican Party?   What if nationalism - even as defined by the MSM - pushes the entrenched globalist eunuchs out of the party, and actually succeed in making America great again?  What if the tenets espoused by the Tea Party - smaller government, more self reliance, fewer taxes and far lower government debt - were actually embraced and promoted by the GOP party elders?  And what if voters in the midterm elections coming up next year said "Hell, yeah!" to all or some of these philosophical betterments and made them happen?  What a wonderful world it would be.

Get mad, get mean, get great!

But the road to that happy place is beset on all sides by ill-wishers in both parties and the media, along with NGOs and other heavily funded resources from outside our borders.  That means George Soros, as well as others.  And the game is already afoot:  History is being erased.  Speech is being censored.  Education has become propaganda.  Biology is being redefined as merely a personal preference.  Ethnic cleansing is alive and well as the war against the white race intensifies.  The radical left, emboldened by sixty years of its applied cultural erosion, is now engaged in all out warfare against the Constitution.

And it all came to a head when the American electorate, having another temper tantrum as Peter Jennings once famously observed, actually chose a political outsider as their duly elected president and commander in chief.  How dare they give a resounding vote of no confidence to the entrenched elitists in power in Washington DC?  It simply isn't done!  

So in November of last year, the campaign began in earnest to destroy not only President Donald Trump, but all who may have voted for him.  Working class white males, discarded as being "deplorable" by Mz Clinton and the Democrats, exacted a little revenge in November.  Clinton lost.  Trump won.

Now we find ourselves in philosophical warfare between two basic ideologies.  The first is the Kenyan's globalist view that America is only one of many nations, and should be taken down a notch or two.  The second is President Trump's contention that America is the world's shining city on the hill, a beacon of freedom and opportunity for all who wish to come here and become Americans.

The power elite and the MSM is heavily invested in the former.  But the American voter chose the latter.  The mid-terms will flesh out the two.  RINOs will be primaried.  Already in Arizona incumbent Jeff Flake is trailing badly  to newcomer Dr. Kelli Ward, due to his anti-Trump and pro-globalist stance.  And remarks.  I doubt that Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell will retain their leadership positions, as the republican voters in fly-over country have had enough betrayal.  They - the working men and women largely ignored by the political class - handed both houses of congress and the Oval Office to Republicans because they wanted no more of the disastrous policies that the Kenyan forced upon them.

But the squishy Republican leadership, by standing in the way of enacting Trump's agenda, has effectively handed over that once-in-a-generation full Republican legislative and executive control to others, and in doing so has betrayed the electorate.  But the American voter wants a new boss, a new direction, and a new competitiveness in this 21st century. If the political class of donor sponsored Republicans want to keep their jobs, they better embrace some platform planks upon which they campaigned, and for which Americans voted. 

They damn sure better, or there will be hell to pay.  You can take that to the bank.

What Can You Say?

It's refreshing to learn that the technology giants are rushing to save free speech, by censoring what they euphemistically refer to as hate speech.  Yep, Google, Facebook, Twitter, several hosting services, ESPN and others have endeavored to save us from speech - both conservative and from-the-right -  that may offend us.  Whew.  As fractionalized as the United States has become under the clinched fist of the Great One, the Kenyan, it's good to know that some of these benighted tech CEOs are there to protect us.

Facebook has cancelled accounts of conservative groups, citing violations of terms of service as their justification. Yeah, like expressing political opinions, which is emphatically protected by the first amendment.  No matter, that.  Anything not in keeping with Facebook's echo chamber, by their definition, is hate speech, and therefore must be stifled.  And they do.   Further, Facebook caved in to Pakistan's government to censor and delete any criticism of Islam.

Google is worse, in that it's essentially the search engine of default in most browsers.  Results of queries are screened for conservative content, and then subsequently filtered in favor of liberal, left wing results. Go ahead, search a controversial topic - "Clinton's crimes" could be an interesting example - and run the same search in Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, or others, and note the difference in what is returned as a match.  Are the results  history, propaganda or political commentary?  It's subtle, but it's there.

One could argue that these are private corporations, and they can set policy as they please.  Fine, I agree.  But the government has retained the right to bust up monopolies, and has done so in the past.  As cultural realities in the 21st century require a reliance on the internet, both for input and output, it's of societal concern to Americans that the medium for political free speech be - as the first amendment guarantees - uncensored.  Even, or especially, if that speech may be repugnant to some.

If someone is prejudiced against certain religious groups, and wished to express that position, such speech should be uncensored.  That goes for opinions that are anti-Muslim, as well as anti-Jew  or anti-Christian, for instance.  Or those opinions that may be anti-black, as well as those who may be anti-white.  Or any other contentious opinion.  That's free speech.  Bigotry is a human attribute, after all.  We're tribal.  Non sunt mei: They are not me.  So what?  It's a good thing that we're different.  We can agree to disagree on whatever topic without either government or corporate censorship. 

Those easily offended among us would do well to remember the famous quote: "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

That's the American way.

Boomerang: Unintended Consequence

Boomerang.  Backlash.  Those are words that refer to unintended consequence.  After decades of being the whipping boy for every cultural fault, shortcoming or slight - whether real or imagined - is it any wonder that white people, especially males, are pushed to the point of pushback?  I don't think so either.  As I've noted on these pages recently, the war against white men began with the misguided feminist movement some sixty years ago.  And, as I've noted, that war was won:  men were ostracized and literally criminalized.  In fact, those feminist radicals' tactics worked so well, that every other aggrieved disenfranchised group has adopted them.  We're victims of you, the great white male, they claimed.  Right. 

Be careful what you throw . . .

So after decades of enduring this war, the white male, genteel to the core, has heretofore smiled and just let it all go.  But in recent years fuel has been added to the fire, and under the divisive Kenyan's reign, the hate of white males has been ramped up by orders of magnitude.  Hate has now become its own ideology.  Hatred not from white males, but of white males.  No problem.  That's permissible.  It's not discrimination or hate speech if vitriol is directed toward white males.  But let a white man express his position on blacks, Hispanics, Muslims or women, and he's excoriated.  

Is it any wonder that white people, especially males, are pushed to the point of pushback?

Enter the interesting case of the website Daily Stormer. Because its editor is a member of what the media refers to as white supremacist, and because of the exercise of his right of free political speech, GoDaddy decided to drop him from its hosting service.  The website's content didn't seem to bother GoDaddy for the years the site has been up, but suddenly it's hate speech.  Which, as many constitutional scholars have pointed out, the suppression of which is actually censorship.  If there is one common attribute of those of the alt-right, another label that the MSM has applied to Daily Stormer, it may be irreverence.  The cite used dark humor to mock feminism, Jewishness, liberals, entrenched government, and every other established icon.  It was satirical if nothing else. Nonetheless, the site was shut down.  No opposition voices may be heard in our free and tolerant society.  Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter, Planned Parenthood, and every other hate group on the far left have had no threats against their respective websites or host providers.

As I write this, the news in the background revealed that several Confederate statutes in several states - including my home state of Florida - have either been torn down and/or vandalized.  Not solely because they were Confederate, but because they were of white guys.  Think that's a stretch?  Consider this:  Al Sharpton on The Charlie Rose Show just called for the removal of the Jefferson Monument in Washington, D.C.  He wasn't kidding.  Jefferson owned slaves, therefore was racist, he explained. 

So there it is.  What started as a hissy fit by unattractive females against the men who wouldn't notice them has now become an ideology within Black Lives Matter and others that are being fueled by the far-left MSM and funded by its sponsor, George Soros.

 

Is it any wonder that white people, especially males, are pushed to the point of pushback?

The War on White

With the recent events coming out of Charlottesville, Virginia, the anti-white-male mainstream media is hoping that they finally have the Great White Terrorist Villain that they've sought for such a long time.  A young white male crashes his car into a crowd, killing one and injuring more.  At last we have the home grown American Terrorist!  The problem is that the young man in question may very well be Jewish.  We'll have to wait to find out if that's so.  But for now, the MSM and grandstanding politicians trash the rally-goers, those normal Americans who had the proper permits to exercise their right to free speech and to peaceably assemble.  Of course, the Soros funded "activists," known to law enforcement as Antifa, short for anti-fascist, were there in numbers as well.  Their job, as anti fascists of course, is to physically attack the rally-goers and start a riot.  Which will essentially quell any assembly or free speech by any other philosophy apart from their own Soros funded fascism.  Yes, the irony is completely lost on them. And true to form, the far left and corrupt governor Terry McAuliffe rescinds the permits, effectively placing the rally-goers in violation of the law.  The Antifa black thugs of course, are not, according the the city's black mayor.

The MSM has its narrative locked down.  White Americans, not all of whom are Southerners by the way, are labelled.  It's easier to hate somebody if they are labelled, especially with a passive-aggressive pejorative.  So these white Americans rally-goers are labeled Nazis, white nationalists, or white supremacists by the oh-so-tolerant MSM.  And we all know it's OK to hate Nazis.  Right?  So goes the war on whites.

How did all this divisiveness begin, this war on white men?  Apart from the Kenyan's eight year constant anti-white, anti-Christian policies, it began in earnest over fifty years ago in the primordial, radical cultural swamp of the 1960s.  And, it began, oddly enough, with self hating Jewish women who were too ugly - both inside and out - to attract a male.  Spoiled narcissists, shrill and vocally vicious, these harpies came onto the scene hating men because of their own personality failings.  Well, it can't be my fault, they said.  It must be men's attitudes that make them look away when I approach.  And so the women's "movement", now called feminism, began.  Led by Gloria Steinem and other females who refused to succumb to nature's most basic law of the sexes, this movement first defined and glorified victimization.  Men victimized women, and that must stop.  All within the guise of egalitarianism, of course.  But equality was never the goal.  Female superiority was.  It was time to bring down the cultural patriarchy of white male cultures.     

It worked.  By the early 1970s, laws were passed.  It became a federal crime to "discriminate" on the basis of sex. To discriminate is to victimize.  To victimize is a crime.  Therefore, only white males can be guilty of  discrimination, because you see, well, they're white.  In today's world, this hate for white males is directed toward what is referred to as white privilege.  I kid you not.  Read some feminist insanity on the topic here.

If you opened that link, you will note how the nonsensical feminist manifesto includes blacks and other people "of color" in their little cadre of victims.  So it's not really about feminism at all, then.  It's about anti-white-American-males. And by extension, any cultural achievement or human advancement brought to civilization by the European - that means white -  patriarchal culture.  And that's what they hate.  White males, and the civilization white males have built. 

It has been working so well that over the last fifty years that we've witnessed the death of the traditional nuclear family, a requisite for civilization for thousands of years.  We've witnessed the rise - and unfortunately a partial public acceptance - of infanticide as a function of a woman's "right."  We've watched as the MSM embraces the reanimation of an obscure 7th century death cult and its war on white culture both here and abroad.  We've watched as other disenfranchised and lunatic fringe groups adopt and employ the same victimization tactics:  blacks, Muslims, non-white Hispanics and central Americans, homosexuals, sexually confused individuals.

The agents of destruction are well on their way to the realization of their stated goal:  the end of white patriarchal American culture, and the removal of its existence from history.  Is it any wonder that white America is waking up and recognizing this existential threat?   Those rally-goers in Charlottesville certainly have done.  They are Americans.  White Americans.  And male. They are not the the villains the mainstream far-leftist media claim them to be. They are you and me.  The folks that built this nation and culture.  And as such, they are those who would defend her from all threats, foreign and domestic.  

And to Gloria Steinem, Lena Dunham, Rosie O'Donnell, the once-beautiful Ashley Judd, and all the other shrill and vicious harpies I say:  Be careful what you wish for.  If whites lose this war, you may just end up Muslim.