Failed, But Not Failure

IS Cash Cow

I keep hearing folks talk about how the Kenyan's foreign policy in the Middle East has failed. But that is a subjective statement, and it's based on a preconceived idea of what "success" and "failure" mean.  If you mean failure from the standpoint of democracy, freedom and American ideals, then it is.  If you mean failure from the standpoint of furthering unrest, expansion of a radicalized cult and the destruction of Israel, then it isn't.  So to most freedom-loving people of non-Muslim persuasion, it's a total charlie-foxtrot, FUBAR'ed unmitigated failure.  Think of the Iran deal, for instance. The liberation of Iraq and its return to a democratic government earlier this century was undone by the feckless Kenyan in a so called effort to "bring our troops home."  Without a force on the ground, the tribal tide came back in to Iraq and then Syria and the cultists once again took over; blood and death followed.  To the cultists, this foreign policy was a success in that it created fertile ground to recruit and conduct their blood lust campaign to bring about the final apoplectic clash between Islam and everyone else.  The Kenyan himself, I'm sure, falls into the latter category.

There' IS NO Comparison

In America, as in Germany, UK, France, Sweden, Greece, Hungary and countries all over Europe, there is no dispute that that influx of Muslim invaders - whether sanctioned by government's policy, or present illegally -  creates serious burdens on Westerners.  For Americans especially, the lawlessness of this invasion is primary.  But once here, Muslims cause the rise in crime and disease, the impact on local school curricula, the welfare burden, and the inherent incompatibility of sharia law with our constitutional liberty.  Consider this statement from former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson back in 1955:

In any broad sense, Islamic law offers the American lawyer a study in dramatic contrasts. Even casual acquaintance and superficial knowledge – all that most of us at bench or bar will be able to acquire – reveal that its striking features relative to our law are not likenesses but inconsistencies, not similarities but contrarieties. In its source, its scope and its sanctions, the law of the Middle East is the antithesis of Western law.

Right Back Atacha, Barry

Antithesis. Contrary to.  Dramatic contrast.  In short, sharia law is not harmonious to Western concepts of individual liberty.  To Americans, importing any Muslim into the United States is an affront to the American way of life and constitutional law.  But the Kenyan and the GOP-DEM-MEDIA oligarchy does it anyway.  To them, this anti-American policy is a success.  To Americans, it is an abject failure of American policy.

And they wonder why Donald Trump is soaring in the primaries.