Monday, September 19, 2016

Another Muslim, Another Bombing

You just can't make this stuff up.  Seriously.  If I presented this story line to a publisher, it'd be rejected as being overly simplistic and pejorative, not to mention antagonistic.

A young man and his brother operate a terror cell out of a fried chicken place in New York, patterned after the hangouts that mob hoods use.  But these guys are Muslims.  They are well known to police as agitators, and attract a following of young Muslim men who are eager to do harm to the United States.  Cops have questioned them on occasion, without arrest or intimidation, but did require they cease business operation by 10:00 pm, due to neighbor noise complaints.  The brothers sue the city, the police department, various officials, and a neighbor living next to the chicken place and claim that despite other businesses being allowed to stay open at that time, they suffered economic hardship.  Case goes to trial, and upon hearing, is dismissed with prejudice.  That means the case had no merit, was vexatious, and cannot be brought up again. Ever.    So not to be dissuaded, the brothers and their happy group of terrorists set some bombs in Manhattan, in New Jersey and elsewhere, and set them off.   People are injured, some seriously, and there's extensive property damage.  The perp is found by the police, and during a shootout he shoots a cop in the lower torso, and afterward goes merrily down the street shooting randomly at anything.  At last the cops arrest and detain him.

Image result for muslim threat
Islam:  Clear and present danger
But it's not a story.  It really did happen just that way.  Muslims who are naturalized, and some who are illegal aliens, join together all over the country to do us harm.  See Minnesota.  But New York's mayor can't bring himself to call it terrorism.  Mzz Clinton or her avatar, barely awake and conscious at 10:00 pm, called it a bombing, but chastised Mr. Trump for using the word bomb.  Mzz Clinton, during her reign as senior salesman at State Department, allowed 31,000 Muslim savages into the country, and in her campaign, has advised us she expects to import 500,000 more.  The Muslim has told us his plan.  He's been very forthright about it, yet we don't believe. We import more.  And more.  Until there will more of them than of us.

And we the people, the American citizenry, are the ultimate victims of all this ideological largess.  In areas where the Kenyan has decreed Muslims shall be imported, such as the area in which I live, we see them all the time.  Some are in their head bags, walking in the middle of the street, openly defiant.  Others are obviously trying too hard to be perceived as Americans.  Opulence abounds.  Families with no visible means of support live in gated communities, drive very expensive cars - Mercedes, Maseratis, Cadillacs - and try way too hard for acceptance.  The Indians don't do that; they're friendly, but not overtly so.  The Asians don't do that either; they're friendly but reserved.

Suspicious is how the Muslims come across.  And do you know why?  It's because they know that you know exactly what they're ultimately up to.

They've told you so.  And they're not making it up.

Friday, September 16, 2016

Post Mortem

HillaryMedicalRecords by Lisa Bardack, MDHillary is dead.  Or is soon to be, according to an unverified source.   We can't be one hundred percent sure, but it does seem to be the case.  Or maybe she's just incapacitated, incoherent and bedridden.  Or maybe she's in a degenerative coma.  Or maybe she's healthy and eagerly awaiting her televised debates with Mr. Trump.  Even if this claim of Sepsis Encephalopathy is a fake, her leaked medical records (right) indicate she nonetheless suffers from Subcortical Vascular Dementia and is in a dire way.  One thing's for sure, however: she's dead politically.  Even her body double won't be able to evade the intense scrutiny that will undoubtedly arise from the debates.

The entrenched media is pulling out all the stops to try to debunk these revelations, yet countless videos of Hillary's behavior and demeanor seem to contradict their story that's she's fine and healthy.  Even of a more subtle nature, a recent Rasmussen poll asked democrat voters who they would prefer to replace Mz. Clinton.  It's doubtful that question would even be considered if Hillary was indeed  healthy and viable.  So the Dems scramble to find an electable candidate - Bernie?  Uncle Joe? Tim Kaine? - while poo-pooing the notion that the esteemed Mz. Clinton's candidacy is, shall we say, mortuus, et sepultus.

It's pretty clear the cat's out of the bag, so we'll see how things progress in the next few days and weeks.  It seems some folks' darkest fears concerning the outcome of this election may be coming to actualization, and all this is merely a precursor to something unprecedented happening in American national elections.

In that vein, I hope she's up and dancing on the tables.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

The Purists' Fallacy

Many conservative purists are part of the Never Trump movement, and I wonder why.  A purist is a conservative who embraces economic freedom, personal liberty, smaller constitutional republic form of government and a laizze faire approach to business by government.  I am one of these.  But many purists cringe at Trump; they say Trump is not a conservative.  They say he's just in it for fame and glory.  A bit of envy, perhaps, as they may be in it for fame, glory and acquiring excessive wealth.  Trump already has excessive wealth.  And the purists know that the other party's candidate is a dinosaur entrenched in crony capitalism, globalist agenda, big government and total control of everything and everyone, whose election will absolutely ensure a continuance of the Kenyan's unparalleled destruction.  Everything a conservative despises.  Yet purists insist that she's a better choice for president than is Donald Trump.  Wow.  I disagree, yet I wonder why the purists hold this to be true.

Yes, I'm a conservative, and I wish we had a conservative in the race.  But I also realize this race isn't about ideology.  It's about survival.  It's about preserving who we are as a people and a culture.  The road back to the conservative nation we once were, with laizze faire economic freedom and personal liberty is long and arduous.  And right now, the good people of this great nation are in survival mode.  Right now they must fight the threat at the door which is a clear and present danger, and other threats will just have to wait their turn.  And right now we need to win this battle first, so we can fight on to win the war.  And winning the war will be the return to what the American experiment was all about.  So it's truly all about this battle.  Right now.

And therein lies the purists' fallacy.

Image result for trump vs mediaTrump understands this.  And while he can be defined as something other than a conservative ideologue, what difference, at this point, does it make.  For eight long hard years, the Kenyan and his internal cabal of leftist globalists and yes, Muslims, have systemically destroyed the country.  Social media have taken up the cause.  Every day in every way Americans are bombarded with anti-American, anti-Christian propaganda.  Goebbels knew that a lie told often enough - and loud enough - will eventually  be perceived as truth.  And the liberal, progressive, globalist politically correct incessant chant has had a payoff, unfortunately.

And Trump is the only one in position at this time to take on the threat at the door.  He is a leader, and that is exactly what is needed now, not an another intellectual pondering the meaning of "conservatism."  He stands up - alone in many cases - against the politically correct ooze that threatens the nation and its way of life.  I get it, and so do scores of millions of other Americans of all creeds, colors and status, who see this threat as a fight to the death for our way of life - and for our children's future.  This nation has fought external enemies and prevailed.  How it fares against an internal one remains to be seen.

Rather than ridiculed and defamed as a fraud or huckster, Trump should be lauded for having the testicular fortitude to take on the threat directly and forcefully; the big government globalists, the sycophantic media, the leftist pundits and the dumbed-down millennials cowering in their snowflake enshrined safe places. 

So to all you purists out there I say, you best be gettin' with the program, bro.  We'll come back to Goldwater and Buckley and others after we win this one.  But right now we need you on our side so that the American experiment will not be lost forever.

And certainly not lost due to a political fallacy.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Third Term, Part Two

With one of the most colorful presidential elections in recent history well under way, and with polls indicating "None of the Above" may get as many votes as the Republican and Democrat party candidates, we may face a unique situation.  A lot of folks are tired of the whole process, and they tend to be same ones who usually tire of political races.  Some folks are on fire, as they rightly see this election as a last chance to preserve a constitutional republic type of government.   As I posted yesterday, HRC's health will be a pivotal factor in this race, and should she pass away post-election, but pre-inaugural, a major decision of how to proceed will be left to the Kenyan.  And that's not good for those of us on the constitutional republic side.  

But what if HRC is now incapacitated to the point of being in a non responsive coma, or perhaps even dead already?  The Democrat party may be already be planing a sequel to Weekend At Bernie's as they pretend she's still alive, propped up in a van perhaps, or replaced by a very convincing body double.  That fraud is a criminal act, of course, but this is the Clinton/Obama/Chicago crime machine we're dealing with after all.  So while all this chaos and uncertainty gives many folks pause, and given the state sponsored media is less than forthcoming when it comes to negative information about the democrats, or HRC in particular, one can certainly speculate freely.  And the wildest speculation may be spot on at the end of the day.

Image result for election fraudBut even more troubling than having a holographic candidate is what the Kenyan's regime plans for the voting process.  Citing false flag situations, such as the presumed Russian hacking of US intelligence systems, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has what he considers a solution: He wants to use his authority under a post-9/11 federal law designed to protect the country against terrorist attacks to designate the election system as “critical infrastructure.” With electronic voting, any manipulation of the result is easy; and not only possible, but probable.  A simpler solution is a return to paper ballots in this writer's view.  But we simply cannot have voters determining election outcomes, now can we?

While this redefining the entire election process to be under the watchful eye of DHS  is intellectually interesting, it's still a big, big liberty problem.  By elevating the election and vote counting process to a "critical infrastructure", the federal government - that means the Kenyan - can simply manage - that means manipulate  - the elections results.  How reassuring. 

So under this newly decreed government authority, if we elect Donald Trump, the Kenyan will cite fraud and irregularities in the vote count, and by virtue of the 2013 presidential directive nullify or suspend the election results.  

If on the other hand, we elect a ghost, or a mere holograph, the Kenyan will be tasked with making a decision as to who - if anyone - will succeed him as 45th President of the United States.  And remember he's stated repeatedly that he really doesn't want to be succeeded.

As an update to my post of yesterday, it certainly appears that the Democrats, and this president specifically, are kicking out all the stops to hold onto power, and to defeat the populist movement that so threatens the globalists' agenda. 

And absent armed revolution, they just may succeed.

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

The Kenyan's 3rd Term: How He'll Do It

Image result for 22nd amendmentThe Twenty-second Amendment of the United States Constitution sets a term limit for election and overall time of service to the office of President of the United States.  Congress passed the amendment on March 21, 1947, and it was ratified by the requisite 36 of the then 48 states on February 27, 1951. Whew!  So we are saved from another disastrous term of the Kenyan's destructive administration, right?

Wait just a minute.  Not so fast.

It's common knowledge that the Kenyan isn't too keen on receding into private life after his second term, as he has affirmatively indicated, so how can a self absorbed psychopathic narcissist circumvent the Constitution and enable himself to continue holding the reins of power?  There's an answer to that, as we shall see.

Let's start with the Democrat Party's presidential candidate, one Hillary Rodham Clinton. After all the ill will and blood letting between her and the Kenyan in both 2008 and 2012 campaigns, how is it that these two are now so lovingly aligned?  Can it be ascribed to simply party loyalty?  Or of mending of fences?  Hardly.

The stage is already being set for Hillary to either win - or contest the results of - the 2016 election.  Two plausible scenarios of doubt and discontent begin to fall into place:  Russia will hack the election in favor of Trump (although there's not a shred of evidence to support this, it's still being floated by left wing media.  Putin actually would most likely prefer HRC as the US leader given their already established cozy relationship); Soros will manipulate the voting results in favor of Hillary because he in fact controls the company that provides many of the voting machines.  Other conspiracy theories include a major attack on the US will result in election suspension; or civil unrest or a financial crisis will render a similar result, or the Kenyan will simply pull a coupe d'etat. These last few may be possible, but unlikely.

Not one to engage in tinfoil hat conspiracy theories, I must say the following one is so Machiavellian and sinister that I tend to give it some credibility.

Let's stipulate on the outset that HRC is seriously, seriously ill. There's ample evidence of this.  But exactly how ill is she?  There's a compelling 10 minute video by a medical professor showing some of HRC's leaked medical records from 2015 which indicate that she has a condition called Subcortical Vascular Dementia.   This condition is progressive - meaning it gets worse and worse over time - and usually results in patients living just 3 to 5 years after diagnosis. If this is her diagnosis, she's got maybe 18 months to live.  Or given the rate of decline in her health over just the past few weeks, maybe much, much less.

Media in frenzy over Trump claim that Obama and Hillary founded ISIS ...
In It Together
So why would she run for president?  And why would her party support such a decisions?  These are key questions.

Two reasons come immediately to mind.  First, HRC's ambitions have always to be the first female president.  That's to be her legacy, even if it results in a death in office.  With literally her dying breath she wants that distinction.  And if elected, and if on the day of her inauguration she passes away or becomes certifiably incapacitated, there will be a constitutional crisis as to who will be president. And that decision - not withstanding any constitutional provisions to the contrary for such an occurrence - may very well and most probably fall to the Kenyan.  It's a mutually advantageous arrangement, then, isn't it?  A win-win.  A legacy for one, extended power for the other.  The ruling party continues on.  Can't do it, you say?

Image result for 22nd amendmentWell, that's the second reason.




Saturday, September 10, 2016

From Russia With Love

Image result for us v russiaRussia.  The country we love to hate.  Ever since Stalin's Soviet Union in 1945, whom General George Patton wanted to take out after his Third Army rolled into Berlin ending the European war, to Khrushchev's ballistic missiles based in Cuba and aimed at Florida in the 1960s (as a young boy growing up in Clearwater in those days, it was a very real and constant threat, which today is forgotten as either ancient or obscure history), to James Bond's arch nemesis, to today's news that Russia is hacking into the United States intelligence service, the Russian Bear seems to have a voracious appetite, and is seen as an enemy to most Americans living today.  Even today Russia continues to flex its military muscle (images here) during war exercises in Crimea.

That Russia is a threat is undeniable.  Three years ago Edward Snowden pulled back the curtain to let Americans see how vulnerable our intelligence services are.  He described the leak last month of NSA espionage tools, potentially by Russia as an “implicit threat” to the US government. Efforts by hackers called the Shadow Brokers to auction off NSA computer code used to break into foreign networks were an attempt to show Washington how vulnerable it was, he added.   We hack them, they hack us, we all hack China and everybody else.   Spy versus spy in a digital world. 

But wait.

There's a worse threat to the Western world, and to the United States especially, and that threat is Islam.  Islam isn't a country; it's not a race; it's not a tribe; it's not even an idea.  It's a death cult that has been in existence for 1,400 years.  Neither its goals nor its methods have changed in all that time.  Its mandate is simple:  To the world, convert or die.  Even with Soviet Union President  Khrushchev's famous "we will bury you!" threat, in this writer's view, is laughable compared to the insidious real threat of Islam.

Here's why.

Image result for the west v islamRussia is a nation.  The United States is a nation.  Both have been preparing and training for war with other nation states for millennia.  We both know how to fight in a nation state against nation state conflict.  But with Islam both countries face a two pronged attack as Islam wages both an asymmetrical and psychological war against Christian nations. As to psychology they move into a new region - a community, a county, a state, a nation -  and by slowly pretending to assimilate, or simply through overwhelming numbers, known to DHS as "settlement jihad", they seek to become a majority.  When that happens, they take over that once free society, and enact sharia law.  As to the physical war, they are violent, to be sure, as their creed demands, and attack at every opportunity.  In fact, there have been over 29,000 worldwide deaths involved from over 11,000 attacks since September 11, 2001.  Here's just a partial list.

And make no mistake, and say what you will about Vladimir Putin, but understand that he has brought Russia back into the Christian fold.  The Soviets were atheists, true, but not so were the Russian people.  Putin has embraced the Orthodox Christian Church, and even more importantly, has prevented Muslims from entering the country.  The United States in contrast, does all it can under the Kenyan's administration to admit as many Muslim savages as he possibly can, while denigrating Christianity.  I have personal contact with several of these sleeper agents, and I can state unequivocally that we're in for a major surprise one day when these peaceful moderate Muslims rise up and begin killing us.  That will be after they are elected to local office by those naive souls who just can't seem to see the forest for the trees.  And when once in political power they will begin to ever so slowly change the American way of life.  Just note London's schizophrenic psyche after electing a Muslin mayor, for a perfect example of insane Islamic influence. 

So if Russia is a threat - and it is -  it's no greater a threat than Zika, or tuberculosis or even leprosy.  These threats and many others - including human threats like Hispanic gangs and Muslim sleepers -  have been introduced into the United States by the Kenyan's hateful arrogance and the catastrophic impact on our culture and way of life have yet to be fully felt.  But that's not so in Putin's administration.

Image result for islam threatSo instead of fighting Russia on all fronts, a far better plan to deal with the global threat of Islam is to join with Russia - perhaps even take some notes from Putin's policies regarding same - and engage, defeat and completely annihilate Islam from the face of the Earth.  The enemy of my enemy is my friend, after all.  And Islam is the enemy of all mankind.  It cannot be appeased.  It cannot be contained.  It must be destroyed.

Don't doubt me on this.