The Kenyan's 3rd Term: How He'll Do It

The Twenty-second Amendment of the United States Constitution sets a term limit for election and overall time of service to the office of President of the United States.  Congress passed the amendment on March 21, 1947, and it was ratified by the requisite 36 of the then 48 states on February 27, 1951. Whew!  So we are saved from another disastrous term of the Kenyan's destructive administration, right?

Wait just a minute.  Not so fast.

It's common knowledge that the Kenyan isn't too keen on receding into private life after his second term, as he has affirmatively indicated, so how can a self absorbed psychopathic narcissist circumvent the Constitution and enable himself to continue holding the reins of power?  There's an answer to that, as we shall see.

Let's start with the Democrat Party's presidential candidate, one Hillary Rodham Clinton. After all the ill will and blood letting between her and the Kenyan in both 2008 and 2012 campaigns, how is it that these two are now so lovingly aligned?  Can it be ascribed to simply party loyalty?  Or of mending of fences?  Hardly.

The stage is already being set for Hillary to either win - or contest the results of - the 2016 election.  Two plausible scenarios of doubt and discontent begin to fall into place:  Russia will hack the election in favor of Trump (although there's not a shred of evidence to support this, it's still being floated by left wing media.  Putin actually would most likely prefer HRC as the US leader given their already established cozy relationship); Soros will manipulate the voting results in favor of Hillary because he in fact controls the company that provides many of the voting machines.  Other conspiracy theories include a major attack on the US will result in election suspension; or civil unrest or a financial crisis will render a similar result, or the Kenyan will simply pull a coupe d'etat. These last few may be possible, but unlikely.

Not one to engage in tinfoil hat conspiracy theories, I must say the following one is so Machiavellian and sinister that I tend to give it some credibility.

Let's stipulate on the outset that HRC is seriously, seriously ill. There's ample evidence of this.  But exactly how ill is she?  There's a compelling 10 minute video by a medical professor showing some of HRC's leaked medical records from 2015 which indicate that she has a condition called Subcortical Vascular Dementia.   This condition is progressive - meaning it gets worse and worse over time - and usually results in patients living just 3 to 5 years after diagnosis. If this is her diagnosis, she's got maybe 18 months to live.  Or given the rate of decline in her health over just the past few weeks, maybe much, much less.

In It Together

So why would she run for president?  And why would her party support such a decisions?  These are key questions.

Two reasons come immediately to mind.  First, HRC's ambitions have always to be the first female president.  That's to be her legacy, even if it results in a death in office.  With literally her dying breath she wants that distinction.  And if elected, and if on the day of her inauguration she passes away or becomes certifiably incapacitated, there will be a constitutional crisis as to who will be president. And that decision - not withstanding any constitutional provisions to the contrary for such an occurrence - may very well and most probably fall to the Kenyan.  It's a mutually advantageous arrangement, then, isn't it?  A win-win.  A legacy for one, extended power for the other.  The ruling party continues on.  Can't do it, you say?

Well, that's the second reason.