The Third Way Con: It's A Trap
Remember the so called Third Way? It's actually a term that's been kicked around for more than a century, but in contemporary usage we can remember that both Tony Blair and Bill Clinton used the term. Supposedly it referred to a solution to seemingly irreconcilable ideologies from the left and the right; a third solution. In those days - the 1980s - there was an impasse in global power between the capitalistic west, primarily the United States, and the socialistic east, primarily the Soviet Union. Blair and Clinton, and even George H. W. Bush before them, proposed the Third Way as the obvious solution. But what the heck is the Third Way?
As we now realize, the Bush-Clinton-Blair cabal was simply espousing an ideology that was essentially a One World Order. Remember George H.W. Bush's reference to the New World Order? That was the implementation of the Third Way. But at the time, the Third Way was moving forward societal change on a global scale in an innocuous way. Behind the scenes. In the dark of night. Off the general public's radar.
Today, as we witness chaotic change in literally every level of societal endeavor, we also begin to recognize that the Third Way is the application of Hegelian Dialectic. What the heck is that, you may well ask. Basically it is the system that is being used by the ruling class to manipulate the public into fulfilling its predetermined agenda. It should be noted that the Marxists, Communists and Socialists have adopted Hegel's Dialectic to further their global ambitions.
Let's define it, so we can understand it. Dialectics is a term used to describe a method of
philosophical argument that involves some sort of contradictory
process between opposing sides. Socrates' famous dialectics involved a person-to-person back-and-forth argument designed to support Socrates' philosophy. In Hegel’s (19th Century German
philosopher, G.W.F. Hegel) dialectics, the arugument relies on a
contradictory process between opposing sides, usually the state versus its citizens.
The Hegel dialectic recognizes an argument (thesis) in conflict with its polar opposite arugument (antithesis), which demands a solution that is neither (synthesis). Whew. Heady stuff. But it's not so confusing if we apply real world examples that are actually happening now. In the example above, the USA's dominance of world politics and economy (thesis) was opposed by the USSR's communism opposite (antithesis), which demanded a global authoritarianism instead of either (synthesis). That's how the globalist authoritarians have managed to carve out a political foothold in every nation, in every society.
The modern elite has taken this a step further by predetermining a
synthesis, their specific agenda, and then developing events that arrive at
that synthesis through artificial means. If the global elite has a result they would like to have, whether it be
increased authoritarian rule or a war that solidifies their power, all
they have to do is devise an anti-thesis that will lead to the outcome
they want. This is commonly done through false flag attacks, where the
government of a nation attacks itself so that it can respond in the way
that it had wanted to all along. It’s recognized that only through that attack
would citizens agree to the planned, redetermined synthesis. False flag attacks are not an uncommon way for governments to fulfill their goals.
Think now about the immigration debate. Apply the Hegelian Dialectic to that chaos. Polarized ideas at odds with each other. Pro-immigration versus America firsters. No middle ground. Or the gun control issue. Gun grabbers versus pro-rights advocates. No middle ground. People tire of the conflict, and take the only solution offered. Enter the Third Way: no borders, nullify the Second Amendment. See how this con is being run? This is how, over the last fifty years, Americans have - little by little - literally voted away their rights.
The next time you're in a political discussion, keep in mind that the argument you're making may very well not be the real issue. Consider what may be the ultimate goal of the elites, whether they be the deep state, the progressive agenda, or fake news purveyors. Think it through: who benefits from which outcome?
The next time you're in a political discussion, keep in mind that the argument you're making may very well not be the real issue. Consider what may be the ultimate goal of the elites, whether they be the deep state, the progressive agenda, or fake news purveyors. Think it through: who benefits from which outcome?
From Families Belong Together Protest, Wash. DC |
The image at right perfectly describes the conflict. Paid protesters fan the flames, heighten the chaos, until the real Americans are exhausted with the fight. This is the Hegelian Dialectic in actual practice. We always knew what the global elites were doing, but the Hegelian Dialectic shows us how how they are doing it. By exposing the game, we can now learn how to win it. And that's pretty much what's been happening over the last eighteen months.
Against all odds, Donald J. Trump won the election by promising to win the battle against the entrenched political globalists elites, and give the country back to we the people.
And he's doing that by not invoking the Third Way.
No comments:
Post a Comment